{"id":15065,"date":"2013-06-11T15:48:40","date_gmt":"2013-06-11T19:48:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/baidu-censorship-lawsuit-gets-new-life-in-us\/"},"modified":"2013-06-11T15:48:40","modified_gmt":"2013-06-11T19:48:40","slug":"baidu-censorship-lawsuit-gets-new-life-in-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/baidu-censorship-lawsuit-gets-new-life-in-us\/","title":{"rendered":"Baidu censorship lawsuit gets new life in US"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    A US judge has given a lawsuit by pro-democracy activists    against Baidu and the People's Republic of China new life, even    after the country invoked its authority as a sovereign nation    to block the censorship case.  <\/p>\n<p>    US District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan said the activists    were entitled to serve their lawsuit on Baidu's lawyer in New    York, without infringing China's sovereign protections.  <\/p>\n<p>    Saying the issue had never been analyzed in detail, Furman on    Friday night rejected Baidu's contention that allowing service    would turn the part of the Hague Convention that China invoked    into a \"dead letter\" by letting a court circumvent it.  <\/p>\n<p>    The convention is a multilateral treaty that makes it easier to    serve court papers internationally.  <\/p>\n<p>    In their May 2011 lawsuit, eight New York writers and video    producers had accused Baidu and China of conspiring to suppress    their political speech from Baidu's search engine, the    country's most widely used.  <\/p>\n<p>    The plaintiffs said the content could be found via search    engines such as Google, Yahoo and Microsoft's Bing, and    Google's YouTube. They sought millions of dollars in damages    for alleged violations of their First Amendment rights and    human rights law.  <\/p>\n<p>    Furman had dismissed the lawsuit on March 25 but put the    dismissal on hold to let the plaintiffs propose another means    to serve Baidu.  <\/p>\n<p>    In giving the plaintiffs another chance to pursue their case,    Furman said the Hague Convention was designed to ensure    \"sufficient\" notice to recipients abroad of court documents.  <\/p>\n<p>    Allowing service in the United States \"in a manner that does    not call upon China to effect service (in that country) does    not override its invocation of its own sovereignty and    security; to the contrary, it honors that invocation,\" the    judge wrote.  <\/p>\n<p>    Carey Ramos, a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan    representing Baidu, declined to comment.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stuff.co.nz\/technology\/digital-living\/8781725\/Baidu-censorship-lawsuit-gets-new-life-in-US\" title=\"Baidu censorship lawsuit gets new life in US\">Baidu censorship lawsuit gets new life in US<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A US judge has given a lawsuit by pro-democracy activists against Baidu and the People's Republic of China new life, even after the country invoked its authority as a sovereign nation to block the censorship case.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/baidu-censorship-lawsuit-gets-new-life-in-us\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15065","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15065"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15065"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15065\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}