In politics, we often skip past the simple questions. This is why inquiries about the fundamentals can sometimes catch everyone short. <\/p>\n
Michael Lind, the independent-minded scholar, posed one such question last week about libertarianism that I hope will shake up the political world. Its important because many in the new generation of conservative politicians declare libertarianism as their core political philosophy. <\/p>\n
E.J. Dionne Jr. <\/p>\n
Writes about politics in a twice-a-week column and on the PostPartisan blog. <\/p>\n
Archive <\/p>\n
Its true that since nearly all Americans favor limits on government, most of us have found libertarians to be helpful allies at one point or another. Libertarians have the virtue, in principle at least, of a very clear creed: They believe in the smallest government possible, longing for what the late philosopher Robert Nozick, in his classic book Anarchy, State, and Utopia, called the night-watchman state. Anything government does beyond protecting people from violence or theft and enforcing contracts is seen as illegitimate. <\/p>\n
If you start there, taking a stand on the issues of the day is easy. All efforts to cut back on government functions public schools, Medicare, environmental regulation, food stamps should be supported. Anything that increases government activity (Obamacare, for example) should be opposed. <\/p>\n
In his bracing 1970s libertarian manifesto For a New Liberty, the economist Murray Rothbard promised a nation that would be characterized by individual liberty, a peaceful foreign policy, minimal government and a free-market economy. <\/p>\n
Rothbards book concludes with boldness: Liberty has never been fully tried in the modern world; libertarians now propose to fulfill the American dream and the world dream of liberty and prosperity for all mankind. <\/p>\n
This is where Linds question comes in. Note that Rothbard freely acknowledges that liberty has never been fully tried, at least by the libertarians exacting definition. In an essay in Salon, Lind asks: <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to see the original: In politics, we often skip past the simple questions. This is why inquiries about the fundamentals can sometimes catch everyone short. Michael Lind, the independent-minded scholar, posed one such question last week about libertarianism that I hope will shake up the political world Continue reading
\nLibertarianism\u2019s Achilles\u2019 heel<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"