{"id":148179,"date":"2016-06-17T05:01:15","date_gmt":"2016-06-17T09:01:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/utopia-book-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/"},"modified":"2016-06-17T05:01:15","modified_gmt":"2016-06-17T09:01:15","slug":"utopia-book-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/new-utopia\/utopia-book-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/","title":{"rendered":"Utopia (book) &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Utopia (Libellus vere aureus, nec minus    salutaris quam festivus, de optimo rei publicae statu deque    nova insula Utopia) is a work of fiction and political philosophy by Thomas More    (14781535) published in 1516 in Latin. The book is a frame narrative primarily depicting a    fictional island society and its religious, social and political    customs. Many aspects of More's description of Utopia are    reminiscent of life in monasteries.[1]  <\/p>\n<p>    The title De optimo rei publicae deque nova insula    Utopia literally translates, \"Of a republic's best state    and of the new island Utopia\". It is variously rendered On    the Best State of a Republic and on the New Island of    Utopia, Concerning the Highest State of the Republic and    the New Island Utopia, On the Best State of a    Commonwealth and on the New Island of Utopia, Concerning    the Best Condition of the Commonwealth and the New Island of    Utopia, On the Best Kind of a Republic and About the New    Island of Utopia, About the Best State of a Commonwealth    and the New Island of Utopia, etc. The original name was    even longer: Libellus vere aureus, nec minus salutaris quam    festivus, de optimo rei publicae statu deque nova insula    Utopia. This translates, \"A truly golden little book, no    less beneficial than entertaining, of a republic's best state    and of the new island Utopia\".  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Utopia\" is derived from the Greek prefix \"ou-\"(ou), meaning \"not\", and topos (), \"place\", with the suffix -i    (-) that is typical of toponyms; hence the name literally means    \"nowhere\", emphasizing its fictionality. In early modern English, Utopia    was spelled \"Utopie\", which is today rendered Utopy in    some editions.[2]  <\/p>\n<p>    A common misunderstanding has that \"Utopia\" is derived from    eu- (e), \"good\", and \"topos\",    such that it would literally translate as \"good place\".[3]  <\/p>\n<p>    In English, Utopia is pronounced exactly as    Eutopia (the latter word, in Greek  [Eutopi], meaning good place,    contains the prefix - [eu-],    \"good\", with which the  of    Utopia has come to be confused in the French and English    pronunciation).[4] This is something that More    himself addresses in an addendum to his book Wherfore not    Utopie, but rather rightely my name is Eutopie, a place of    felicitie.[5]  <\/p>\n<p>    One interpretation holds that this suggests that while Utopia    might be some sort of perfected society, it is ultimately    unreachable (see below).  <\/p>\n<p>    The work begins with written correspondence between Thomas More    and several people he had met on the continent: Peter Gilles,    town clerk of Antwerp, and Hieronymus van Busleyden,    counselor to Charles V. More chose    these letters, which are communications between actual people,    to further the plausibility of his fictional land. In the same    spirit, these letters also include a specimen of the Utopian alphabet and its poetry. The    letters also explain the lack of widespread travel to Utopia;    during the first mention of the land, someone had coughed    during announcement of the exact longitude and latitude. The    first book tells of the traveller Raphael Hythlodaeus, to whom    More is introduced in Antwerp, and it also explores the subject    of how best to counsel a prince, a popular topic at the time.  <\/p>\n<p>    The first discussions with Raphael allow him to discuss some of    the modern ills affecting Europe such as the tendency of kings    to start wars and the subsequent loss of money on fruitless    endeavours. He also criticises the use of execution to punish    theft, saying thieves might as well murder whom they rob, to    remove witnesses, if the punishment is going to be the same. He    lays most of the problems of theft on the practice of enclosurethe enclosing    of common landand the subsequent poverty and starvation of    people who are denied access to land because of sheep farming.  <\/p>\n<p>    More tries to convince Raphael that he could find a good job in    a royal court, advising monarchs, but Raphael says that his    views are too radical and wouldn't be listened to. Raphael sees    himself in the tradition of Plato: he knows that for good governance, kings    must act philosophically. However, he points out that:  <\/p>\n<p>    More seems to contemplate the duty of philosophers to work    around and in real situations and, for the sake of political    expediency, work within flawed systems to make them better,    rather than hoping to start again from first principles.  <\/p>\n<p>    Utopia is placed in the New World and More links Raphael's travels in    with Amerigo Vespucci's real life voyages of    discovery. He suggests that Raphael is one of the 24 men    Vespucci, in his Four    Voyages of 1507, says he left for six months at    Cabo Frio,    Brazil. Raphael then travels further and finds the island of    Utopia, where he spends five years observing the customs of the    natives.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to More, the island of Utopia is  <\/p>\n<p>    The island was originally a peninsula but a 15-mile wide    channel was dug by the community's founder King Utopos to    separate it from the mainland. The island contains 54 cities.    Each city is divided into four equal parts. The capital city,    Amaurot, is located directly in the middle of the crescent    island.  <\/p>\n<p>    Each city has 6000 households, consisting of between 10 and 16    adults. Thirty households are grouped together and elect a    Syphograntus (whom More says is now called a phylarchus). Every    ten Syphogranti have an elected Traniborus (more    recently called a protophylarchus) ruling over them. The    200 Syphogranti of a city elect a Prince in a secret ballot.    The Prince stays for life unless he is deposed or removed for    suspicion of tyranny.  <\/p>\n<p>    People are re-distributed around the households and towns to    keep numbers even. If the island suffers from overpopulation,    colonies are set up on the mainland. Alternatively, the natives    of the mainland are invited to be part of these Utopian    colonies, but if they dislike it and no longer wish to stay    they may return. In the case of underpopulation the colonists    are re-called.  <\/p>\n<p>    There is no private property on Utopia, with goods    being stored in warehouses and people requesting what they    need. There are also no locks on the doors of the houses, which    are rotated between the citizens every ten years. Agriculture    is the most important job on the island. Every person is taught    it and must live in the countryside, farming for two years at a    time, with women doing the same work as men. Parallel to this,    every citizen must learn at least one of the other essential    trades: weaving (mainly done by the women), carpentry, metalsmithing and masonry. There is deliberate simplicity    about these trades; for instance, all people wear the same    types of simple clothes and there are no dressmakers making    fine apparel. All able-bodied citizens must work; thus    unemployment is eradicated, and the length of the working day    can be minimised: the people only have to work six hours a day    (although many willingly work for longer). More does allow    scholars in his society to become the ruling officials or    priests, people picked during their primary education for their    ability to learn. All other citizens are however encouraged to    apply themselves to learning in their leisure time.  <\/p>\n<p>    Slavery is a    feature of Utopian life and it is reported that every household    has two slaves. The slaves are either from other countries or    are the Utopian criminals. These criminals are weighed down    with chains made out of    gold. The gold is part of the community wealth of the country,    and fettering criminals with it or using it for shameful things    like chamber    pots gives the citizens a healthy dislike of it. It also    makes it difficult to steal as it is in plain view. The wealth,    though, is of little importance and is only good for buying    commodities from foreign nations or bribing these nat<br \/>\nions to    fight each other. Slaves are periodically released for good    behaviour. Jewels are worn by children, who finally give them    up as they mature.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other significant innovations of Utopia include: a welfare state    with free hospitals, euthanasia permissible by the state, priests    being allowed to marry, divorce permitted, premarital    sex punished by a lifetime of enforced celibacy and    adultery being punished by enslavement. Meals are taken in    community dining halls and the job of feeding the    population is given to a different household in turn. Although    all are fed the same, Raphael explains that the old and the    administrators are given the best of the food. Travel on the    island is only permitted with an internal    passport and any people found without a passport are, on a    first occasion, returned in disgrace, but after a second    offence they are placed in slavery. In addition, there are no    lawyers and the law is made deliberately simple, as all should    understand it and not leave people in any doubt of what is    right and wrong.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are several religions on the island: moon-worshipers, sun-worshipers, planet-worshipers,    ancestor-worshipers and monotheists, but each    is tolerant of the others. Only atheists are despised (but allowed) in Utopia, as    they are seen as representing a danger to the state: since they    do not believe in any punishment or reward after this life,    they have no reason to share the communistic life of Utopia,    and will break the laws for their own gain. They are not    banished, but are encouraged to talk out their erroneous    beliefs with the priests until they are convinced of their    error. Raphael says that through his teachings Christianity was    beginning to take hold in Utopia. The toleration of all other    religious ideas is enshrined in a universal prayer all the    Utopians recite.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wives are subject to their husbands and husbands are subject to    their wives although women are restricted to conducting    household tasks for the most part. Only few widowed women    become priests. While all are trained in military arts, women    confess their sins to their husbands once a month. Gambling,    hunting, makeup and astrology are all discouraged in Utopia.    The role allocated to women in Utopia might, however, have been    seen as being more liberal from a contemporary point of view.  <\/p>\n<p>    Utopians do not like to engage in war. If they feel countries    friendly to them have been wronged, they will send military    aid. However they try to capture, rather than kill, enemies.    They are upset if they achieve victory through bloodshed. The    main purpose of war is to achieve that which, if they had    achieved already, they would not have gone to war over.  <\/p>\n<p>    Privacy is not regarded as freedom in Utopia; taverns,    ale-houses and places for private gatherings are non-existent    for the effect of keeping all men in full view, so that they    are obliged to behave well.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the most troublesome questions about Utopia is    Thomas More's reason for writing it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Most scholars see it as some kind of comment or criticism of    contemporary European society, for the evils of More's day are    laid out in Book I and in many ways apparently solved in Book    II.[7]    Indeed, Utopia has many of the characteristics of satire, and    there are many jokes and satirical asides such as how honest    people are in Europe, but these are usually contrasted with the    simple, uncomplicated society of the Utopians.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yet, the puzzle is that some of the practices and institutions    of the Utopians, such as the ease of divorce, euthanasia and both    married priests and female priests, seem to    be polar opposites of More's beliefs and the teachings of the    Catholic Church of which he was a devout    member. Another often cited apparent contradiction is that of    the religious toleration of Utopia contrasted with his    persecution of Protestants as Lord    Chancellor. Similarly, the criticism of lawyers comes from    a writer who, as Lord Chancellor, was arguably the most    influential lawyer in England. However, it can be answered that    as a pagan society Utopians had the best ethics that could be    reached through reason alone, or that More changed from his    early life to his later when he was Lord Chancellor.[7]  <\/p>\n<p>    One highly influential interpretation of Utopia is that of    intellectual historian Quentin    Skinner.[8] He has argued that More was taking    part in the Renaissance    humanist debate over true nobility, and that he was writing    to prove the perfect commonwealth could not occur with private    property. Crucially, his narrator Hythlodaeus embodies the    Platonic view that philosophers should not get involved in    politics and his character of More has the more pragmatic    Ciceronic view; thus the society Hythlodaeus proposes is the    ideal More would want, but without communism, which he saw no    possibility of occurring, it was wiser to take a more pragmatic    view. Utopia is thus More's ideal, but an unobtainable one,    explaining why there are inconsistencies between the ideas in    Utopia and More's practice in the real world.  <\/p>\n<p>    Quentin Skinner's interpretation of Utopia is consistent with    the speculation that Stephen Greenblatt made in The Swerve: How the    World Became Modern. There, Greenblatt argued that More    was under the Epicurean influence of Lucretius's On the    Nature of Things and the people that live in Utopia were an    example of how pleasure has dictated them as the guiding    principle of life.[9]    Although Greenblatt acknowledged that More's insistence on the    existence of an afterlife and punishment for people holding    contrary views were inconsistent with the essentially    materialist view of Epicureanism, Greenblatt contended that it    was the minimum conditions for what the pious More would have    considered as necessary to live a happy life.[9]  <\/p>\n<p>    Another complication comes from the Greek meaning of the names    of people and places in the work. Apart from Utopia, meaning    \"Noplace,\" several other lands are mentioned: Achora    meaning \"Nolandia\", Polyleritae meaning \"Muchnonsense\",    Macarenses meaning \"Happiland,\" and the river    Anydrus meaning \"Nowater\". Raphael's last name,    Hythlodaeus means \"dispenser of nonsense\" surely implying that    the whole of the Utopian text is 'nonsense'. Additionally the    Latin rendering of More's name, Morus, means \"fool\" in Greek.    It is unclear whether More is simply being ironic, an in-joke    for those who know Greek, seeing as the place he is talking    about does not actually exist or whether there is actually a    sense of distancing of Hythlodaeus' and the More's (\"Morus\")    views in the text from his own.  <\/p>\n<p>    The name Raphael, though, may have been chosen by More to    remind his readers of the archangel Raphael who is mentioned in the    Book of    Tobit (3:17; 5:4, 16; 6:11, 14, 16, 18; also in chs. 7, 8,    9, 11, 12). In that book the angel guides Tobias and later    cures his father of his blindness. While Hythlodaeus may    suggest his words are not to be trusted, Raphael meaning \"God    has healed\" suggests that Raphael may be opening the eyes of    the reader to what is true. The suggestion that More may have    agreed with the views of Raphael is given weight by the way he    dressed; with \"his cloak... hanging carelessly about him\"; a    style which Roger Ascham reports that More himself was    wont to adopt. Furthermore, more recent criticism has    questioned the reliability of both Gile's annotations and the    character of \"More\" in the text itself. Claims that the book    only subverts Utopia and Hythlodaeus are possibly    oversimplistic.  <\/p>\n<p>    Utopia was begun while More was an envoy in Flanders in May 1515.    More started by writing the introduction and the description of    the society which would become the second half of the work and    on his return to England he wrote the \"d<br \/>\nialogue of counsel\",    completing the work in 1516. In the same year, it was printed    in Leuven under    Erasmus's editorship and after revisions by More it was printed    in Basel in November    1518. It was not until 1551, sixteen years after More's    execution, that it was first published in England as an English    translation by Ralph Robinson. Gilbert    Burnet's translation of 1684 is probably the most commonly    cited version.  <\/p>\n<p>    The work seems to have been popular, if misunderstood: the    introduction of More's Epigrams of 1518    mentions a man who did not regard More as a good writer.  <\/p>\n<p>    The word Utopia    overtook More's short work and has been used ever since to    describe this kind of imaginary society with many unusual ideas    being contemplated. Although he may not have founded the genre    of Utopian and dystopian    fiction, More certainly popularised it and some of the    early works which owe something to Utopia include    The City of the Sun by Tommaso    Campanella,     Description of the Republic of Christianopolis by    Johannes Valentinus Andreae,    New    Atlantis by Francis Bacon and Candide by Voltaire.  <\/p>\n<p>    The politics of Utopia have been seen as influential to    the ideas of Anabaptism and communism.[citation    needed] While utopian    socialism was used to describe the first concepts of    socialism, later Marxist theorists tended to see the ideas    as too simplistic and not grounded on realistic principles. The    religious message in the work and its uncertain, possibly    satiric, tone has also alienated some theorists from the work.  <\/p>\n<p>    An applied example of More's utopia can be seen in Vasco de    Quiroga's implemented society in Michoacn,    Mexico, which was    directly taken and adapted from More's work.  <\/p>\n<p>    The opening scene in the movie A Man for all Seasons set in an    eatery, before Thomas More appears, Utopia comes up in the    conversation. England's priests and their alleged immorality    (Somebody says every 2nd person born is fathered by a priest)    is compared to the priests of Utopia.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Utopia_(book)\" title=\"Utopia (book) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\">Utopia (book) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Utopia (Libellus vere aureus, nec minus salutaris quam festivus, de optimo rei publicae statu deque nova insula Utopia) is a work of fiction and political philosophy by Thomas More (14781535) published in 1516 in Latin. The book is a frame narrative primarily depicting a fictional island society and its religious, social and political customs. Many aspects of More's description of Utopia are reminiscent of life in monasteries.[1] The title De optimo rei publicae deque nova insula Utopia literally translates, \"Of a republic's best state and of the new island Utopia\".  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/new-utopia\/utopia-book-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187819],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-148179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-new-utopia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148179"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148179"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148179\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}