{"id":147059,"date":"2016-02-07T01:45:03","date_gmt":"2016-02-07T06:45:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/atheism-simple-english-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia\/"},"modified":"2016-02-07T01:45:03","modified_gmt":"2016-02-07T06:45:03","slug":"atheism-simple-english-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/atheism\/atheism-simple-english-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Atheism &#8211; Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Atheism is rejecting belief that there is a god.[1][2] It is the opposite of theism, which is the belief    that at least one god exists. A person who rejects belief in gods is called an    atheist.  <\/p>\n<p>    Atheism is not the same as agnosticism. Agnostics say that there is no    way to know whether gods exist or not.[3] Being an agnostic    does not have to mean a person rejects or believes in god. Some    agnostics are theists, believing in god. The theologian Kierkegaard is an example. Other agnostics    are atheists.  <\/p>\n<p>    Atheists often give reasons why they do not believe in a god or    gods. Three of the reasons that they often give are the    problem    of evil, the argument from    inconsistent revelations, and the argument from nonbelief. Not all    atheists think these reasons provide complete proof that gods    cannot exist, but they are reasons given to support rejecting    belief that gods exist. Some atheists think there is no    evidence for any god or gods and goddesses so believing any type of    theism means    believing unproved assumptions. These atheists think a    simpler explanation for everything is methodological naturalism which    means that only natural things exist. Occam's razor    shows simple explanations without many unproved guesses are    more likely to be true.[4]  <\/p>\n<p>    The word atheism comes from the Greek    language. It can be divided into a- (), a Greek    prefix meaning    \"without\", and theos (), meaning \"god\", and    recombined to form \"without gods\"[6] or    \"godless\". In Ancient Greece it also meant \"impious\".  <\/p>\n<p>    Starting in about the 5th century BC, the word came to describe    people who were \"severing relations with the gods\" or \"denying    the gods\". Before then, the meaning had been closer to    \"impious\". There is also the abstract noun,     (atheots), \"atheism\".  <\/p>\n<p>    Cicero transliterated    the Greek word into the Latin atheos. This word was often used in    the debate between early Christians and Hellenists.    Each side used it to label the other, in a bad way.[7]  <\/p>\n<p>    Karen Armstrong writes that \"During the sixteenth and    seventeenth centuries, the word 'atheist' was still reserved    exclusively for polemic ... The term    'atheist' was an insult. Nobody would have dreamed of calling    himself an atheist.\"[8]Atheism    was first used to describe an openly positive belief in late    18th-century Europe, meaning disbelief in the monotheistic Abrahamic    god.[9] The    20th century saw the term expand to refer to disbelief in all    deities. However, it is still common in Western society to    describe atheism as simply \"disbelief in God\".[10]  <\/p>\n<p>    In many places, it is (or was) a crime to be make public the idea of atheism.    Examples would be to claim the Bible or Qur'an could not be    true, or to speak or write that there is no god.[11]  <\/p>\n<p>    Muslim apostasy, that is becoming an    atheist or believing in a god other than Allah, may be a dangerous act in places with    many conservative Muslim people. Many religious courts have    punished and some still punish this act with the death penalty.    Many countries still have laws against atheism.[12][13][14]  <\/p>\n<p>    Atheism is becoming more common,[15] mainly in    South America, North America, Oceania and Europe (by percentage    of people that had a religion before and started to be    atheist).  <\/p>\n<p>    In many countries, mainly in the Western world, there are laws that protect atheists' right    to express their atheistic belief (freedom of    speech). This means that atheists have the same rights    under the law as everyone else. Freedom    of religion in international law and treaties includes    the freedom to not have a religion.  <\/p>\n<p>    Today, about 2.3% of the world's population describes itself as    atheist. About 11.9% is described as nontheist.[16] Between    64% and 65% of Japanese describe themselves as atheists,    agnostics, or non-believers,[17][18] and up to 48% in    Russia.[17]    The percentage of such people in European Union member states    ranges between 6% (Italy) and 85% (Sweden).[17]  <\/p>\n<p>    People disagree about what atheism means. They disagree on when    to call certain people atheists or not.  <\/p>\n<p>    Atheism has sometimes been described as someone not believing in God.    This is very general. It includes people who have never heard    about God, but would believe in God if they did learn about    God.  <\/p>\n<p>    George H. Smith created the expressions \"implicit atheism\" and    \"explicit atheism\" to describe the difference between different    types of Atheism. Implicit Atheism is when you do not    believe in God because you do not know about God. Explicit    Atheism is when you do not believe in God after learning    about God.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 1772, Baron d'Holbach said    that \"All children are born Atheists; they have no idea of    God\".[19]  <\/p>\n<p>    In 1979 George H. Smith said that: \"The man who is unacquainted    with theism is an atheist because he does not believe in a god.    This category would also include the child [who is able to]    grasp the issues involved, but who is still unaware of those    issues. The fact that this child does not believe in god    qualifies him as an atheist\".[20]  <\/p>\n<p>    These two quotes describe Implicit Atheism.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ernest    Nagel disagrees with Smith's definition of atheism as an    \"absence of theism\", saying only explicit atheism is true    atheism.[21] This means that Nagel believes    that to be an Atheist, a person needs to know about God and    then reject the idea of God.  <\/p>\n<p>    Philosophers like Antony Flew,[22] Michael    Martin,[10] and    William L. Rowe[23] have looked at    strong (sometimes called positive) atheism against weak    (sometimes called negative) atheism. According to this idea,    anyone who does not believe in a god or gods is either a weak    or a strong atheist.[24]  <\/p>\n<p>    Strong Atheism is the certain belief that no god exists. An    older way of saying Strong Atheism is to say \"Positive Atheism\"    Weak atheism is all other forms of not believing in a god or    gods. An older way of saying Weak Atheism is to say \"Negative    Atheism\" These terms have been used more    in philosophical writing[22] and in Catholic beliefs.[25] since at    least 1813.[26][27] Under this    definition of atheism, most Agnostics are Weak Atheists.  <\/p>\n<p>    Michael Martin says that agnosticism includes weak    atheism.[10] Some    agnostics, including Anthony Kenny, disagree. They think being    an agnostic is different from being an atheist. They think    atheism is no different from believing in a god, because both    require belief. This overlooks the reality that agnostics also    have their own belief or \"claim to knowledge\" [28]  <\/p>\n<p>    Agnostics say that it cannot be known if a god or gods exist.    In their view, strong atheism requires a leap of faith.    The mathematician W. K. Clifford wrote an essay called The    Ethics of Belief.[29] In this    essay, Clifford shows some examples how people can believe in    things which go against what they see or feel. One of these    examples is a story of a ship captain who transports    immigrants. The immigrants have to pay to be able to go on the    ship. The ship is old and needs to be fixed badly. The captain    thought about fixing the ship, but then decided not to. The    captain told himself that the ship has safely made many trips    and survived many storms before. The captain thought the ship    would be okay without being fixed, so he had no need to be    scared. Unfortunately the ship sinks, and all die. The    shipowner is greedy and    takes the money the insurance pays for the ship. According to    Clifford, the captain did something that is wrong. When he made    himself believe there were no problems with the ship, he did    this because he is greedy. Even if the ship had made its trip    safely, the captain would have done something that is wrong.    According to Clifford, it is always wrong to believe something    without enough re<br \/>\nasons.[3]  <\/p>\n<p>    Atheists usually respond by saying that there is no difference    between an idea about religion with no proof, and an idea about    other things[30] The lack of proof that god does    not exist does not mean that there is no god, but it also does    not mean that there is a god.[31] Scottish    philosopher J. J. C. Smart says that \"sometimes a person who is    really an atheist may describe herself, even passionately, as    an agnostic because of unreasonable generalised philosophical skepticism which    would preclude us from saying that we know anything whatever,    except perhaps the truths of mathematics and formal    logic.\"[32] So,    some popular atheist authors such as Richard    Dawkins like to show the difference between theist,    agnostic and atheist positions by the probability assigned to the statement    \"God exists\".[33]  <\/p>\n<p>    In everyday life, many people define natural phenomena without    the need of a god or gods. They do not deny the existence of    one or more gods, they simply say that this existence is not    necessary. Gods do not provide a purpose to life, nor influence    it, according to this view.[34] Many scientists practice    what they call methodological naturalism. They    silently adopt philosophical naturalism and use the scientific    method. Their belief in a god does not affect their    results.[35]  <\/p>\n<p>    Practical atheism can take different forms:  <\/p>\n<p>    Theoretic atheism tries to find arguments against the existence    of god, and to disprove the arguments of Theism, such as the    argument from design or Pascal's    Wager. These theoretical reasons have many forms, most of    them are ontological or epistemological. Some rely on psychology or    sociology.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to Immanuel Kant, there can be no proof of a    supreme being that is made using reason. In his work, \"Critique of pure reason\", he    tries to show that all attempts of either proving the existence    of God, or disproving it, end in a logical contradictions. Kant    says that it is impossible to know whether there are any higher    beings. This makes him an agnostic.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ludwig    Feuerbach published The Essence of Christianity in    1841.[37] In his work he postulates the    following:  <\/p>\n<p>    The following phrases sum up Feuerbach's writing:  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/simple.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Atheism\" title=\"Atheism - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\">Atheism - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Atheism is rejecting belief that there is a god.[1][2] It is the opposite of theism, which is the belief that at least one god exists. A person who rejects belief in gods is called an atheist.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/atheism\/atheism-simple-english-wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia-2\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162381],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-147059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atheism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147059"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=147059"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/147059\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=147059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=147059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=147059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}