{"id":146122,"date":"2015-09-07T07:49:26","date_gmt":"2015-09-07T11:49:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.designerchildren.com\/review-of-our-posthuman-future\/"},"modified":"2015-09-07T07:49:26","modified_gmt":"2015-09-07T11:49:26","slug":"review-of-our-posthuman-future","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/posthuman\/review-of-our-posthuman-future\/","title":{"rendered":"Review of Our Posthuman Future"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>          Francis Fukuyama, the well-known author of The          End of History and the Last Man, takes on a subject          far from his usual field of international political          economy: biotechnology. Yet, in his introduction, he          shows that there is indeed a link: his 1989 book met with          a great deal of criticism, and one argument he found          impossible to refute was that there could be no end of          history unless there was an end of science. This new          book takes that concept further, and considers the          impact of modern biology on the understanding of          politics.        <\/p>\n<p>          Being a child of the 1950s, Fukuyama cites two          books that were not only decisive in forming his          worldview, and that of others growing up in the same          period, but which act as templates for examining how our          world might evolve. George Orwells 1984, which          posits a world of centralized control, never came to be          as such, partly because the Internet which developed is          the opposite of the centralized system shown in this          dystopia. But Aldous Huxleys Brave New World          still gives us food for thought, as the biotechnology          revolution gets underway. In Huxleys world, drugs were          made to ensure that peoples every need and desire be          met, essentially abolishing human nature. Fukuyama argues          that, Huxley was right, that the most significant threat          posed by contemporary biotechnology is the possibility          that it will alter human nature and move us into a          posthuman stage of history.        <\/p>\n<p>          Fukuyama seems worried more by the possibility that          the biotech revolution will have political          consequences rather than any specific effect on          individuals. He sees the potential for class wars, as the          rich have access to drugs and techniques that make them,          and their children, smarter, stronger, and longer-living.          This is indeed a different issue than the more basic          moral questions than arise, and he is right to raise it.          For what would happen in a world, which is already          strongly polarized between haves and have-nots, when the          haves not only enjoy better goods, food and living          conditions, but also life, by purchasing extra          years of living, new organs when the old ones break down,          or by designing their children before their          births.        <\/p>\n<p>          As the floodgates of biotechnology open, there are          several areas of exploration that, unfortunately, get          conflated or confused. The main issues are not limited to          human cloning, which has gotten by far the greatest          amount of press. Other issues involve cognitive          neuroscience, and the possibility of controlling          behavior; neuropharmacology, and the creation of drugs          that enhance certain emotions and repress others; genetic          engineering, where new plants and animals can be          created, or where humans can be modified; and the          prolongation of life, either through the use of chemicals          or transplants, or other, as yet undiscovered techniques.                  <\/p>\n<p>          What Fukuyama succeeds in showing in this book is          the extent to which the biotechnology revolution can and          will affect us. Far beyond the simple debate over human          cloning and stem-cell research, which have led to          distinct camps digging into the trenches, defending          either scientific or religious beliefs, the myriad issues          involvedsome of which are already present, others which          may or may not exist, according to the success or failure          of scientistswill have a great effect on the future of          our civilization. But will the effect be greater than          other revolutions, such as the agricultural and          industrial revolutions? Fukuyama calls for common sense          and the regulation of experiments and applications, so          mistakes are not made through precipitation.        <\/p>\n<p>          In short, this is an essential book, for two          reasons. First, because its lucid, objective presentation          of the issues and their context allows the reader to          understand what is at stake without undue religious or          racist leanings which have often, over the years, been          lurking behind many of these questions. And second,          because, like it or not, these issues exist, and choices          will have to be made, and soon.        <\/p>\n<p>          Kirk McElhearn         <\/p>\n<p>          Kirk McElhearn (kirk@mcelhearn.com) is a          freelance writer and translator living in a village in          the French Alps. You can find out all about him at his          web site, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mcelhearn.com\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.mcelhearn.com<\/a>.        <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.techsoc.com\/posthuman.htm\" title=\"Review of Our Posthuman Future\">Review of Our Posthuman Future<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Francis Fukuyama, the well-known author of The End of History and the Last Man, takes on a subject far from his usual field of international political economy: biotechnology.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/posthuman\/review-of-our-posthuman-future\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187806],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posthuman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146122"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146122\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}