This article is about a critique of humanism. For the futurist ideology and movement, see transhumanism. <\/p>\n
Posthumanism or post-humanism (meaning \"after humanism\" or \"beyond humanism\") is a term with five definitions:[1] <\/p>\n
Schatzki [2001][7] suggests there are two varieties of posthumanism of the philosophical kind: <\/p>\n
One, which he calls 'objectivism', tries to counter the overemphasis of the subjective or intersubjective that pervades humanism, and emphasises the role of the nonhuman agents, whether they be animals and plants, or computers or other things. <\/p>\n
A second prioritizes practices, especially social practices, over individuals (or individual subjects) which, they say, constitute the individual. <\/p>\n
There may be a third kind of posthumanism, propounded by the philosopher Herman Dooyeweerd. Though he did not label it as 'posthumanism', he made an extensive and penetrating immanent critique of Humanism, and then constructed a philosophy that presupposed neither Humanist, nor Scholastic, nor Greek thought but started with a different ground motive [1]. Dooyeweerd prioritized law and meaningfulness as that which enables humanity and all else to exist, behave, live, occur, etc. \"Meaning is the being of all that has been created,\" Dooyeweerd wrote [1955, I, 4],[8] \"and the nature even of our selfhood.\" Both human and nonhuman alike function subject to a common 'law-side', which is diverse, composed of a number of distinct law-spheres or aspects. The temporal being of both human and non-human is multi-aspectual; for example, both plants and humans are bodies, functioning in the biotic aspect, and both computers and humans function in the formative and lingual aspect, but humans function in the aesthetic, juridical, ethical and faith aspects too. The Dooyeweerdian version is able to incorporate and integrate both the objectivist version and the practices version, because it allows nonhuman agents their own subject-functioning in various aspects and places emphasis on aspectual functioning (see his radical notion of subject-object relations. <\/p>\n
Ihab Hassan, theorist in the academic study of literature, once stated: <\/p>\n
Humanism may be coming to an end as humanism transforms itself into something one must helplessly call posthumanism.[9] <\/p>\n
This view predates the currents of posthumanism which have developed over the late 20th century in somewhat diverse, but complementary, domains of thought and practice. For example, Hassan is a known scholar whose theoretical writings expressly address postmodernity in society.[citation needed] Theorists who both complement and contrast Hassan include Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, Bruno Latour, N. Katherine Hayles, Peter Sloterdijk, Stefan Lorenz Sorgner, Evan Thompson, Francisco Varela and Douglas Kellner. Among the theorists are philosophers, such as Robert Pepperell, who have written about a \"posthuman condition\", which is often substituted for the term \"posthumanism\".[3][5] <\/p>\n
Posthumanism mainly differentiates from classical humanism in that it restores the stature that had been made of humanity to one of many natural species. According to this claim, humans have no inherent rights to destroy nature or set themselves above it in ethical considerations a priori. Human knowledge is also reduced to a less controlling position, previously seen as the defining aspect of the world. The limitations and fallibility of human intelligence are confessed, even though it does not imply abandoning the rational tradition of humanism.[citation needed] <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read the rest here: <\/p>\n
Posthumanism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This article is about a critique of humanism. For the futurist ideology and movement, see transhumanism. Posthumanism or post-humanism (meaning \"after humanism\" or \"beyond humanism\") is a term with five definitions:[1] Schatzki [2001][7] suggests there are two varieties of posthumanism of the philosophical kind: One, which he calls 'objectivism', tries to counter the overemphasis of the subjective or intersubjective that pervades humanism, and emphasises the role of the nonhuman agents, whether they be animals and plants, or computers or other things Continue reading