{"id":13552,"date":"2013-05-12T07:47:11","date_gmt":"2013-05-12T11:47:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/censorship-feeds-criticism-of-chinese-poisoning-case\/"},"modified":"2013-05-12T07:47:11","modified_gmt":"2013-05-12T11:47:11","slug":"censorship-feeds-criticism-of-chinese-poisoning-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/censorship-feeds-criticism-of-chinese-poisoning-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Censorship Feeds Criticism of Chinese Poisoning Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    (Corrects description of Sun Weis grandfather in third    paragraph.)  <\/p>\n<p>    Why did Chinas leading social-media platform recently ban    users from performing searches for a woman poisoned in 1995?    Attempts to answer that question -- and to censor the answers    -- have sparked some of the most politically potent online    commentary on Chinese leadership, privilege and corruption in    recent memory.  <\/p>\n<p>    The details of the almost two-decade-old case are sordid and    murky. In 1995, Zhu Ling was a promising undergraduate at    Beijings elite Tsinghua    University when she came down with a mysterious illness    that was thought to be poisoning via thallium, a toxic element    once used as rat poison.    This finding soon    led to a suspect: Sun Wei, a roommate of Zhus who happened    to be one of the few undergraduates at Tsinghua to have access    to thallium in a laboratory.  <\/p>\n<p>    Most important for the politically minded Chinese netizen, Sun    Wei was the granddaughter of a high-ranking official who was    thought to be close to then-President Jiang Zemin. In 1997, Sun was detained by police for    questioning for eight hours but not arrested. Soon after, the    case was closed, and Sun reportedly fled to the U.S., where    its rumored shes married with kids (enterprising    microbloggers have tried to keep tabs).  <\/p>\n<p>    Meanwhile, Zhu, permanently disabled, lives with two elderly    parents ill-suited to care for someone that Hong    Kongs South China Morning Post described    as a 200-pound, paralyzed, diabetic, almost-blind woman    with the mental capacity of a six-year-old.  <\/p>\n<p>    Over the last month, the tale has re-emerged as a populist    cause celebre. The trigger was the early April fatal    poisoning of a student at Shanghais Fudan University by    another    student, which evoked memories of the    1995 incident. Over the course of April, Zhus name became    an increasingly popular topic of conversation and a proxy for    anger at official privilege. Few offenses inspire Chinese    online ire like the use of privilege -- especially by children of    those in power -- to avoid the consequences of criminal    behavior.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its not clear that anyone intervened in Zhus case, but that    hardly matters in a China accustomed to rumor. Zhus angry and    media-savvy supporters -- long-stymied in their efforts to have    the investigation reopened -- quickly rallied online support.  <\/p>\n<p>    On April 29, Zhang Jie, lawyer to Zhu and her family, posted    this tweet to    Sina Weibo (it has subsequently been deleted):  <\/p>\n<p>    In traditional Chinese culture we not only say the same rules    apply to everyone even if he is a prince, but we also say    senior officials have the privilege of avoiding criminal    penalties. This kind of contradiction appears in the Zhu Ling    case. We want to capture the murderer and convict her (or him)    of the crime, but the key fact of this case is that when oral    testimony is needed, senior officials have the privilege to    avoid it; after the prince breaks the law, the fact is there    isnt enough evidence to prove that he violated the law. These    unspoken rules for protecting officials have existed in China    for thousands of years, and we are challenging them.  <\/p>\n<p>    That challenge was soon met by Sina Weibos censors, who --    over the past 10 days -- became progressively more aggressive    in managing, and censoring, the conversation about Zhu Ling.    Its impossible to know for certain whether this was proactive    censorship that anticipated government orders or whether it was    implemented at the explicit direction of the authorities. But    from the standpoint of Sina Weibos users, the government    appeared to be involved.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Follow this link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2013-05-06\/censorship-feeds-criticism-of-chinese-poisoning-case.html\" title=\"Censorship Feeds Criticism of Chinese Poisoning Case\">Censorship Feeds Criticism of Chinese Poisoning Case<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> (Corrects description of Sun Weis grandfather in third paragraph.) Why did Chinas leading social-media platform recently ban users from performing searches for a woman poisoned in 1995? Attempts to answer that question -- and to censor the answers -- have sparked some of the most politically potent online commentary on Chinese leadership, privilege and corruption in recent memory <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/censorship-feeds-criticism-of-chinese-poisoning-case\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13552"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13552"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13552\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}