{"id":12997,"date":"2013-04-25T04:43:39","date_gmt":"2013-04-25T08:43:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/dna-breakthrough-spelt-double-trouble-for-nobels\/"},"modified":"2013-04-25T04:43:39","modified_gmt":"2013-04-25T08:43:39","slug":"dna-breakthrough-spelt-double-trouble-for-nobels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/dna-breakthrough-spelt-double-trouble-for-nobels\/","title":{"rendered":"DNA breakthrough spelt double trouble for Nobels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The discovery of the DNA double helix 60 years ago proved to be    a headache for the Nobel organisation as the feat became    nominated for prizes in different categories at the same time,    Nature reported on Wednesday.  <\/p>\n<p>    Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins of Britain and James Watson    of the United States shared the Nobel Prize for Medicine in    1962, nine years after revealing that the code for life has a    spiral-staircase structure joined by chemical rungs.  <\/p>\n<p>    But two researchers who delved into the award process were    stunned to find that the trio were simultaneously nominated for    the Nobel Prize for Chemistry that same year.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The fact that the double helix was the subject of nominations    for both prizes must have presented a dilemma for the two    [award] committees,\" Alexander Gann and Jan Witkowski of Cold    Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York report in a letter to the    journal.  <\/p>\n<p>    The evidence comes from a letter that French geneticist Jacques    Monod wrote to the Nobel Committee for Chemistry, nominating    the trio for the chemistry award. Gann and Witkowski found the    letter in the archives of the Pasteur Institute in Paris.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the event, the 1962 chemistry Nobel went to Max Perutz and    John Kendrew for work on haemoglobin and myoglobin.  <\/p>\n<p>    The only person to have won the Nobel in different categories    of science is Marie Curie, who in 1903 shared the physics award    with her husband Pierre and Henri Becquerel, and in 1911 was    the sole winner of the chemistry prize.  <\/p>\n<p>    Separately, Gann and Witkowski say that Crick wrote a nine-page    letter to Monod on December 31 1961 to describe his joint quest    with Watson to identify DNA.  <\/p>\n<p>    In his letter, Crick \"acknowledges the importance\" of X-ray    imaging by Rosalind Franklin in determining \"certain features\"    of DNA's structure, the pair say.  <\/p>\n<p>    Franklin has become a cause celebre among some feminists, who    say Crick, Watson and Wilkins snubbed her and never    acknowledged her vital contribution.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/uk.news.yahoo.com\/dna-breakthrough-spelt-double-trouble-nobels-165122261.html\" title=\"DNA breakthrough spelt double trouble for Nobels\">DNA breakthrough spelt double trouble for Nobels<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The discovery of the DNA double helix 60 years ago proved to be a headache for the Nobel organisation as the feat became nominated for prizes in different categories at the same time, Nature reported on Wednesday. Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins of Britain and James Watson of the United States shared the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1962, nine years after revealing that the code for life has a spiral-staircase structure joined by chemical rungs <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/dna-breakthrough-spelt-double-trouble-for-nobels\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12997","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12997"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12997"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12997\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12997"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12997"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12997"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}