Whether it's an assault or a relatively minor offense such as destroying a library book, Coloradans convicted of a misdemeanor would have to open wide and say \"aaagh,\" should lawmakers pass a requirement that the state collect from them an oral DNA sample. <\/p>\n
In what's billed as an ambitious effort to solve cold cases, exonerate those wrongfully convicted and quell future crimes, a Democratic state lawmaker wants to require that individuals convicted of Class 1, Class 2 or Class 3 misdemeanors must submit a DNA sample to be stored in a statewide database system. <\/p>\n
But this effort to expand DNA collection to misdemeanor convictions has raised concerns about privacy issues and the rationale behind such a requirement. <\/p>\n
\"DNA is the 21st century fingerprint,\" said Rep. Dan Pabon, a Denver Democrat, who is the sponsor of the legislation that's set to be heard before a House committee Thursday. \" We have become so sophisticated in our technology and science, we can without a shadow of a doubt link someone physically to a crime.\" <\/p>\n
Already in Colorado, individuals arrested on a felony charge and some misdemeanors involving unlawful sexual conduct are required to provide the state with a DNA sample. And those convicted of a misdemeanor under the proposed legislation would have to pay a $128 fee to cover the costs of the sample. <\/p>\n
Late Wednesday afternoon, after The Denver Post reported about Pabon's bill online, the sponsor said he would offer an amendment to the measure that would only require Class 1 misdemeanors be swabbed. <\/p>\n
However, though Pabon is targeting most misdemeanor offenses, his legislation does not require those convicted of misdemeanor traffic offenses such as DUIs to submit oral samples. <\/p>\n
\"We don't have the statistics that demonstrate just because you're drinking and driving that you have a propensity to commit more serious crimes,\" Pabon said. \"With respect to theft crimes, assault crimes, those involving the objectification of a person ... those types of crimes indicate that you're going to commit more serious crimes.\" <\/p>\n
Denise Maes, public policy director at the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, said it's a false assumption to conclude that any person who commits a low-level misdemeanor will commit more serious crimes in the future. <\/p>\n
\"This encroaches on an individual's privacy,\" said Maes, who will offer testimony on Thursday in opposition to the bill. \"Further, listen carefully to the rationale supporting this bill: 'Collecting DNA helps solve crime.' There is no end to this mission. One may facetiously say 'just chip us at birth,' but in reality this is precisely where the rationale of the proponents naturally leads us to.\" <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read the original post: Whether it's an assault or a relatively minor offense such as destroying a library book, Coloradans convicted of a misdemeanor would have to open wide and say \"aaagh,\" should lawmakers pass a requirement that the state collect from them an oral DNA sample. In what's billed as an ambitious effort to solve cold cases, exonerate those wrongfully convicted and quell future crimes, a Democratic state lawmaker wants to require that individuals convicted of Class 1, Class 2 or Class 3 misdemeanors must submit a DNA sample to be stored in a statewide database system. Continue reading
\nMisdemeanor convictions in Colorado could call for DNA swab<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"