Index on Censorship opposes recommendations for the statutory underpinning of press regulation <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Index urges that there is a serious, considered debate about Lord Justice Levesons recommendations. The free speech organisation opposes the statutory underpinning of press regulation proposed by Lord Justice Leveson. <\/p>\n
Kirsty Hughes, Chief Executive of Index on Censorship said: <\/p>\n
We consider that the statutory-voluntary approach to independent press regulation would undermine press freedom in the UK. However, we support the proposal for cheap, effective arbitration, which would help victims get swift redress to their complaints. <\/p>\n
Index welcomed the response of the Prime Minister to the Inquirys findings. In a statement to parliament, David Cameron said that he had serious concerns about passing legislation in relation to the press, which he rightly said would be an enormous step. <\/p>\n
Kirsty Hughes said: We share David Camerons concerns that statutory underpinning would undermine free speech, and could be the start of a slippery slope of government interference in the media. <\/p>\n
Indexs response to Lord Justice Levesons main recommendations are: <\/p>\n
Statutory underpinning of an independent regulatory body: Statutory underpinning of an independent and voluntary regulator is a contradiction in terms. Any law which sets out the criteria that the press must meet, by definition introduces some government or political control of the media. Politicians of all hues have an interest in getting the most positive media coverage they can. Keeping print media independent of government so journalists can report on political debate and decision-making, robustly and without fear, is fundamental. Even light statutory regulation could easily be revisited, toughened and potentially abused once the principle of no government control of the press is breached. <\/p>\n
Arbitration service: Index welcomes Lord Justice Levesons proposal for cheap, effective arbitration. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read the original here: Index on Censorship opposes recommendations for the statutory underpinning of press regulation Index urges that there is a serious, considered debate about Lord Justice Levesons recommendations. The free speech organisation opposes the statutory underpinning of press regulation proposed by Lord Justice Leveson. Kirsty Hughes, Chief Executive of Index on Censorship said: We consider that the statutory-voluntary approach to independent press regulation would undermine press freedom in the UK. Continue reading
\nIndex on Censorship \u2019s response to the Leveson report<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"