Washington The US Supreme Court grappled on Monday with the thorny issue of how far the First Amendment stretches to protect offensive and frightening speech when the speaker claims his statements are meant in jest and delivered in the form of rap lyrics. <\/p>\n
The case is potentially important because it could test the outer boundaries of First Amendment protection of threatening communications that put others in fear for their safety. <\/p>\n
It is also important because it arises in the context of comments posted on Facebook. It provides the justices with their first opportunity to examine free speech issues that are increasingly arising in the fast-paced world of social media, where careless or malicious comments can achieve vast circulation in an instant. <\/p>\n
The issue arises in the case of Pennsylvania man Anthony Elonis, who was convicted of writing a series of threatening posts on his Facebook page. The posts included menacing comments directed at his estranged wife and at an FBI agent who came to his home to investigate the Facebook posts. <\/p>\n
Mr. Elonis maintains that his posts were protected speech because, as rap lyrics, they were artistic expression. He also argues that he never intended that his comments would be taken as an actual threat that would put others in fear for their lives. <\/p>\n
The Facebook site included repeated notices that the content was strictly for entertainment and that the posts were not meant to pose a threat to anyone, Washington appellate lawyer John Elwood told the justices. <\/p>\n
But some members of the court seemed skeptical. <\/p>\n
This sounds like a road map for threatening a spouse and getting away with it, Justice Samuel Alito said. <\/p>\n
The question in the case is when menacing comments cross the line separating free speech that is protected under the First Amendment from true threats that can be prosecuted as a crime. <\/p>\n
Although the First Amendment protects a wide swath of speech, Americans are not free to say anything they like. For example, it is illegal to falsely yell Fire! in a crowded theater. It is illegal to make false, malicious statements about someone with the intent to harm their reputation. And Congress passed a law making it illegal to deliver true threats that place someone in fear. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See more here: Washington The US Supreme Court grappled on Monday with the thorny issue of how far the First Amendment stretches to protect offensive and frightening speech when the speaker claims his statements are meant in jest and delivered in the form of rap lyrics. The case is potentially important because it could test the outer boundaries of First Amendment protection of threatening communications that put others in fear for their safety. It is also important because it arises in the context of comments posted on Facebook. Continue reading
\nAre Facebook rants threats or free speech? Supreme Court takes up case. (+video)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"