{"id":12006,"date":"2013-03-07T15:59:35","date_gmt":"2013-03-07T20:59:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/censorship-alert-academic-study-shows-sina-weibos-human-censors-are-pretty-darn-fast\/"},"modified":"2013-03-07T15:59:35","modified_gmt":"2013-03-07T20:59:35","slug":"censorship-alert-academic-study-shows-sina-weibos-human-censors-are-pretty-darn-fast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/censorship-alert-academic-study-shows-sina-weibos-human-censors-are-pretty-darn-fast\/","title":{"rendered":"Censorship Alert! Academic Study Shows Sina Weibo&#8217;s Human Censors Are Pretty Darn Fast"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    If you wanted to learn more about Sina Weibo's censorship    patterns, today is your lucky day. A group of computer    scientists from Bowdoin College, Rice College, and the    University of New Mexico have, along with an independent    researcher, released the results of an academic study of Sina    Weibo's censorship practices.     The study, which we came across via     MIT Technology Review, used \"architecture [that could]    detect post deletions within one minute of the deletion event,\"    giving the researchers perhaps the most precise look yet into    how quickly Sina's content team takes down sensitive Weibo    posts. The results? Sina is pretty darn fast:  <\/p>\n<p>    So Sina's censors are pretty fast. But what, exactly, are they    deleting? Researchers used a variety of analytical tools to    look at what content was most quickly deleted, and found that:  <\/p>\n<p>    Researchers also found that, unsurprisingly, users with more    total deleted posts tended to get their posts deleted more    quickly than other users, suggesting that Sina's content team    was watching their accounts more carefully. The following chart    from the study shows the downward trend in post lifetime as a    user's number of total deleted posts increases:  <\/p>\n<p>    Of course, it's not all humans doing the deleting. In fact, by    the study's estimations, for an all-human team to censor Weibo,    4,200 team members would be required, assuming each team member    could read at the blazing rate of 50 posts per minute. The    study points out that as a result of that, weibo's censorship    system has become an incredibly complex system, employing both    human and software censors, employing multiple blocked keyword    lists that trigger different censorship responses, search    filtration systems, and more. (Of course, none of that should    come as much of a surprise to longtime weibo users, who have    likely experienced many of the different types of censorship on    Sina Weibo firsthand).  <\/p>\n<p>    If you're really interested in Weibo censorship,     the full paper is worth a read, and although it's a bit dry    and quite technical in places, the good news is that it's only    ten pages long.  <\/p>\n<p>    (via     MIT Technology Review)  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/ph.news.yahoo.com\/censorship-alert-academic-study-shows-001047761.html\" title=\"Censorship Alert! Academic Study Shows Sina Weibo's Human Censors Are Pretty Darn Fast\">Censorship Alert! Academic Study Shows Sina Weibo's Human Censors Are Pretty Darn Fast<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> If you wanted to learn more about Sina Weibo's censorship patterns, today is your lucky day. A group of computer scientists from Bowdoin College, Rice College, and the University of New Mexico have, along with an independent researcher, released the results of an academic study of Sina Weibo's censorship practices. The study, which we came across via MIT Technology Review, used \"architecture [that could] detect post deletions within one minute of the deletion event,\" giving the researchers perhaps the most precise look yet into how quickly Sina's content team takes down sensitive Weibo posts.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/censorship-alert-academic-study-shows-sina-weibos-human-censors-are-pretty-darn-fast\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12006"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12006"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12006\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}