{"id":11855,"date":"2013-03-02T15:58:11","date_gmt":"2013-03-02T20:58:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/genome-to-go\/"},"modified":"2013-03-02T15:58:11","modified_gmt":"2013-03-02T20:58:11","slug":"genome-to-go","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/genome-to-go\/","title":{"rendered":"Genome to Go"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Photo: Ava Helen and Linus Pauling Papers\/ Oregon State    University Libraries Photo 51: This historic    X-ray diffraction image of DNA, taken in 1952 by Rosalind    Franklin and Raymond Gosling, was obtained by stretching a    fragile thread of crystalline DNA across a paper clip stuck in    a cork, passing an X-ray beam through it for 100 hours, and    capturing the results on photographic paper. Click on image    to enlarge.  <\/p>\n<p>    Next month marks the     60th anniversary of the discovery of the double helix structure    of DNA by James Watson and Francis Crick. To ordinary    folks, the image (known as Photo    51) that confirmed the Watson-Crick model doesnt look like    anything. But without this imageand without the brilliant work    of X-ray crystallographer     Rosalind Franklinthe Cambridge lads had a theory and a    model but no actual proof that DNA was indeed the molecule of    life. It took Franklins technical know-how and perseverance    for that secret to be revealed.  <\/p>\n<p>    Biology is now one of many sciences thats almost completely    dependent on technology: The technologies that allow us to view    human biology at the molecular level have driven the genomic    revolution. Automation, robotics, high-speed processors, and    sophisticated computer programs have taken what was once the    painstaking handwork of DNA identification, isolation,    preparation, and sequencing and turned them into digital    processes. The first sequencing    of the human genome took 13 years and US $3 billion. Now    machines the size of a multipurpose office printer will soon be    able to do the same for sums of about $1000, and all in a days    time.  <\/p>\n<p>    But what will this mean on a human level? Eliza Stricklands    article in this issue, The Gene Machine    and Me, is about her very personal experience with    Ion Torrents    semiconductor-based genome-sequencing machines. These    machines, which turn chemical signals into digital form, are    the latest demonstration of the powerful electronic    technologies driving all things genomic. In an echo of events    60 years ago, when several    labs [PDF] competed to discover the true nature of DNA,    several    companies are now racing to create genomic technology for    widespread use.  <\/p>\n<p>    Why is this significant? After all, for $100 you can already    send away a bit of spit to a direct-to-consumer DNA testing    company like 23andMe.    Their results will tell you if youre related to Genghis Khan,    carry disease traits you could pass on to your children, or    have an elevated risk of developing diabetes. These companies    use a technology that examines the million points on the genome    that vary among individuals.  <\/p>\n<p>    But being able to predict, prevent, or treat disease based on    the sequencing of your entire genomewhich is made up of 3    billion componentsis a far more complicated business. Its    also more rewarding. The collection and analysis of large sets    of individual genomes should eventually help researchers    establish the root causes of complex diseases and allow them to    create individualized treatment and even cures.  <\/p>\n<p>    Patient-driven, personalized, precision    medicine has significant hurdles to overcome, and not just    technical ones. One of the most important is how to sequence    millions, if not billions, of people to broaden our    understanding of which genes correspond to which disease    vulnerabilities, as well as other inherited characteristics.    And while were doing that, well need to develop more big-data    software programs to sift through all the information from    these genomesa single human genome alone is about 4 gigabytes.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other big challenges include training doctors to use genomic    information in their practices, getting pharmaceutical    companies to give up their blockbuster drug revenue model, and    goading insurance companies into abandoning their rigid    reliance on actuarial tables. And all this must happen as we    simultaneously take on the inevitable genetic discrimination    problems and myriad other ethical issues that will spring up.  <\/p>\n<p>    As the former editor of a biotechnology journal, I have seen    lots of breakthroughs, revolutions, and quantum leaps heralded    as being on the brink of transforming our lives forever. But    these transformations never occur overnight and take years,    often decades, to reveal themselves.  <\/p>\n<p>    Thats the case with human genomics and its impact on medicine.    Genetics has been poised to change medicine since Gregor Mendel    tended his peas. In 10 years or so, after weve all had our    genomes sequenced and are toting them around on our tricorders,    the benefits for medicine of genome sequencing and its    attendant technologies should become truly apparentas will all    the tics and bumps that make each of us uniquely human.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the article here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/spectrum.ieee.org\/biomedical\/devices\/genome-to-go\" title=\"Genome to Go\">Genome to Go<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Photo: Ava Helen and Linus Pauling Papers\/ Oregon State University Libraries Photo 51: This historic X-ray diffraction image of DNA, taken in 1952 by Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling, was obtained by stretching a fragile thread of crystalline DNA across a paper clip stuck in a cork, passing an X-ray beam through it for 100 hours, and capturing the results on photographic paper. Click on image to enlarge. Next month marks the 60th anniversary of the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA by James Watson and Francis Crick <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genome\/genome-to-go\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11855"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11855"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11855\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}