{"id":11781,"date":"2013-02-28T00:45:40","date_gmt":"2013-02-28T05:45:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/privacy-vs-censorship-google-spanish-government-face-off-in-european-courts\/"},"modified":"2013-02-28T00:45:40","modified_gmt":"2013-02-28T05:45:40","slug":"privacy-vs-censorship-google-spanish-government-face-off-in-european-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/privacy-vs-censorship-google-spanish-government-face-off-in-european-courts\/","title":{"rendered":"Privacy Vs Censorship: Google, Spanish Government Face Off In European Courts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    In a test case that could have    significant implications for Google throughout Europe the    company faced off against the Spanish data protection authority    in the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg.    One could frame the case as privacy vs. censorship.  <\/p>\n<p>    From the Spanish governments point of view its data protection    authority is simply vindicating the recently articulated right    (of individuals) to be forgotten  to have content or data    about them removed from the search index upon request. From        Googles perspective, if the court agrees with Spain, the    outcome would be tantamount to granting individuals the right    to censor Google.  <\/p>\n<p>    A concise     statement of the underlying facts of the case is provided    by Reporters without Borders:  <\/p>\n<p>      The AEPD rejected Costejas complaint against the      newspaper on the grounds that the publication of the      information was legal and was protected by the right to      information but, with extraordinary inconsistency, upheld      his complaint his complaint against Google, ordering the      search engine to eliminate about 100 links from all future      searches for Costejas name.    <\/p>\n<p>      Google refused to accept the ruling and filed an appeal .      . .    <\/p>\n<p>    As Google indicated in its blog post, there are roughly 200    cases like this pending in Spain featuring individuals seeking    to have content about them removed from search results.  <\/p>\n<p>    As the factual summary above indicates, Spanish authorities    decided that newspapers are protected from these individual    takedown requests by a right to information or expression    (free speech). However, Google is not being given the same    treatment. This is true despite the fact that in    earlierdecisions,    Google was labeled a publisher for purposes of libel laws.  <\/p>\n<p>    Google thus gets the liability treatment of a publisher    without the corresponding freedom of expression protections    accorded to newspapers.  <\/p>\n<p>    Speaking with someone with knowledge of the European Court    proceedings yesterday, I was told that the judges expressed    skepticism about at least some of Spains arguments in the    case. For example, Spain wants Google to remove the disputed    information not just from its Spanish index but from all Google    results globally.  <\/p>\n<p>    I was told that a ruling may not come down for several months.    And, like the US Supreme Court, the European judicial body    could narrowly rule on the particular facts or broadly    articulate principles around the right to be forgotten that    might apply across Europe.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/searchengineland.com\/privacy-vs-censorship-google-spanish-government-face-off-in-european-courts-149876\" title=\"Privacy Vs Censorship: Google, Spanish Government Face Off In European Courts\">Privacy Vs Censorship: Google, Spanish Government Face Off In European Courts<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> In a test case that could have significant implications for Google throughout Europe the company faced off against the Spanish data protection authority in the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg. One could frame the case as privacy vs <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/privacy-vs-censorship-google-spanish-government-face-off-in-european-courts\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11781"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11781"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11781\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}