Even the most open, democratic governments have sought laws and new forms of surveillance that many see as a new wave of censorship -- and that includes the United States. <\/p>\n
The U.S. government asked Google for data on its users more than 31,000 times in 2012 alone, for example. And the government rarely obtained a search warrant first, Google recently revealed; in nearly all cases, the company ended up turning over at least some data. <\/p>\n
Some argue that heightened surveillance, restrictions on Internet freedom and even censorship are necessary to protect intellectual property rights, prevent cyberespionage, fight child pornography, and protect national interests such as nuclear power plants from hackers. And here the U.S. is far from alone. <\/p>\n
\"A number of democratic states have considered or implemented various restrictions in response to the potential legal, economic, and security challenges raised by new media,\" notes the Freedom House report \"Freedom on the Net 2012.\" <\/p>\n
Anxiety over online theft and cyberattacks is not unwarranted. Virtually every major U.S. company and media outlet has been a victim. Google was attacked back in 2009. Facebook, Apple and Microsoft revealed this month that hackers had breeched their defenses. And The New York Times and Wall Street Journal have fought off Chinese hackers for months. Indeed, dozens of countries have their own online hacking groups -- so-called cyber or asymmetrical warfare divisions. <\/p>\n
- Freedom House report Freedom on the Net 2012 <\/p>\n
\"It's been going on in China since at least May 2002,\" said Alan Paller, founder of the SANS Institute, an information security and training firm. <\/p>\n
Consequently, lawmakers -- even President Obama in his State of the Union address -- have been motivated to take steps to stem the hacking tide. However, the road to better security could also stifle free speech. <\/p>\n
When the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) met in Dubai in December, some 89 member countries including Russia, China, Cuba and Iran, supported a treaty that would give individual governments more control over the Internet's infrastructure. <\/p>\n
Sensing a thinly veiled attempt to suppress dissent, 55 countries -- including Canada and the U.S. -- said no. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read this article: Even the most open, democratic governments have sought laws and new forms of surveillance that many see as a new wave of censorship -- and that includes the United States. Continue reading
\nBIG BROTHER? US Linked to Censorship, Surveillance on Internet<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"