In a Maryland case that's garnered the attention of the other 49 states, the federal Department of Justice and the national science community, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday over whether to restrict police in collecting DNA to solve crimes. <\/p>\n
The justices will rule on a police practice common in Maryland: taking genetic information from individuals arrested but not convicted to link them to unsolved crimes. In the past, the court has acknowledged the power of DNA but has not allowed it to run afoul of fundamental American rights such as the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches. <\/p>\n
At the center of the case is a Salisbury man, Alonzo Jay King. Police took his DNA when he was arrested in 2009 on assault charges and linked him to the 2003 rape of a Wicomico County woman at gunpoint. King appealed his rape conviction, challenging the key DNA evidence. <\/p>\n
The Baltimore-based Office of the Public Defender, which represents King, contends that taking DNA from a person before he or she is convicted of a crime tramples on the constitutional promise to be protected from warrantless searches. Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler argues that, once arrested for a crime, an individual is not entitled to the same expectation of privacy. <\/p>\n
\"There is a great deal at stake,\" Gansler said in an interview. \"The use of DNA has really become commonplace in criminal investigations since the O.J. Simpson case. <\/p>\n
\"Not being able to use DNA would be a significant blow to law enforcement efforts,\" he said. \"When you're using DNA evidence, you know exactly who committed a crime and who didn't.\" <\/p>\n
Colin Starger, a University of Baltimore assistant professor of law, said a defendant, such as King, who has been found guilty of a violent crime doesn't necessarily draw much sympathy. <\/p>\n
\"It's not about him; it's about much broader concerns,\" he said. <\/p>\n
Starger said allowing police to collect DNA samples in the name of solving crimes opens up the potential for the government's systematic invasion of privacy and the risk of exacerbating inherent racial and socioeconomic inequities in American criminal justice. <\/p>\n
African-Americans made up 60 percent of the individuals for whom DNA was stored in Maryland's arrestee database in 2011, but blacks accounted for 30 percent of the population. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
More here: In a Maryland case that's garnered the attention of the other 49 states, the federal Department of Justice and the national science community, the U.S. Continue reading
\nU.S. Supreme Court to hear arguments over Maryland DNA case<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"