{"id":1127072,"date":"2024-07-17T23:41:55","date_gmt":"2024-07-18T03:41:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/offshore-wind-group-looks-to-challenge-chinas-dominance-of-sector-power-magazine\/"},"modified":"2024-07-17T23:41:55","modified_gmt":"2024-07-18T03:41:55","slug":"offshore-wind-group-looks-to-challenge-chinas-dominance-of-sector-power-magazine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/offshore-wind-group-looks-to-challenge-chinas-dominance-of-sector-power-magazine\/","title":{"rendered":"Offshore Wind Group Looks to Challenge Chinas Dominance of Sector &#8211; POWER magazine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Countries active in the offshore wind industry continue to    consider steps to counter Chinas dominance of the sector. The    latest to announce a move is South Korea, where officials    recently announced they may work with a global offshore wind    industry group in order to better compete with China.  <\/p>\n<p>    Officials have said joining the Global Offshore Wind Alliance    (GOWA), perhaps as soon as this year, would help South Korean    companies increase their presence in the offshore wind    equipment manufacturing market. Reports on July 7 said Koreas    Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy is scheduled to sign on    with the GOWA in the second half of 2024. The GOWA, founded by    Denmark, the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), and    the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), was formed in November    2022 during the COP27 conference in Egypt.  <\/p>\n<p>    GOWA has 20 member states, including the U.S., the European    Commission, and the UK. Among the groups missions is to    counter Chinas dominance in offshore wind through supporting    domestic equipment production and providing subsidies to local    companies.  <\/p>\n<p>    China continues to pace the worlds offshore wind power    industry, with installations of 18-MW turbines at two different    sites during June. One project is in northeast China, in    Liaoning Province, where testing began June 30 on turbines    installed there. The power from that site will be used to serve    Yingkou City. State-owned power generator Dongfang Electric    Corp. on June 5 announced it completed installation of similar    turbines at a coastal test base in Shantou, in Guangdong    Province.  <\/p>\n<p>    The 18-MW turbines are to date the worlds largest by power    rating to enter service. The turbines have a 260-meter, or    853-foot, rotor diameter, and a swept area of 53,000 square    meters, or 570,487 square feet. Officials said the turbines are    expected to generate 72 GWh of electricity annually.  <\/p>\n<p>    Envision Energy in June announced it had connected its    EN-256\/16.7 prototype to the power grid in Sheyang, China,    which was briefly the worlds largest to produce power. The    first EN-256\/16.7 unit rolled off the production line at the    Sheyang Zero Carbon Industrial Park in January of this year.  <\/p>\n<p>    China accounts for about half of the worlds installed offshore    wind power generation capacity, with the country ranking first    globally for at least the past four years. Chinese    manufacturers continue to design larger turbines, rapidly    increasing the technologys size after China Three Gorges Corp.    brought the first 16-MW offshore wind turbine online in July    2023.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mingyang, headquartered in Zhongshan, Guangdong, China, in    December of last year said it was designing a turbine that    could offer as much as 20 MW of power, with a rotor diameter of    as much as 958 feet, and a swept area equivalent to the size of    nine soccer fields. Luxcara, a German-based renewable energy    asset manager, recently announced it has signed a preferred    turbine supplier agreement with Mingyang for Waterkant, an    offshore wind farm sited in the North Sea. Reports said the    agreement is for 16 of Mingyangs turbines, each with up to    18.5 MW of generation capacity.  <\/p>\n<p>    Luxcara said it launched an international tender for    Waterkants equipment late last year. The company in its    selection announcement said it chose Mingyangs turbines after    an extensive due diligence exercise, covering the supply    chain, ESG [environmental, social, governance] compliance    aligned with the EU [European Union] taxonomy, and    cybersecurity supported by independent experts from renowned    international advisers.  <\/p>\n<p>    Germany also is a GOWA member, and German officials have said    they will look at the security and competition aspects of the    Waterkant project using Chinese-made turbines. A spokesperson    for Germanys economy ministry told Reuters, The federal    government will look at this decision very closely. On the one    hand, in relation to the question of critical infrastructure.    On the other hand, the level playing field must be maintained    in relation to competition.  <\/p>\n<p>    WindEurope, the European wind power industrys lobbying group,    also called for the deal to be scrutinized, saying in a    statement: Germany and the European Union must consider    whether they see wind energy as a strategic sector before it is    too late.  <\/p>\n<p>    A Korean government official said the decision to join GOWA    makes sense, because Korea has all the value chains for    offshore wind power plants. We are expected to benefit the most    from the U.S. and Europes moves to exclude Chinese products.  <\/p>\n<p>    Paul DeCotis, senior partner at consultancy West Monroe, told    POWER: Membership in GOWA will help member countries    accelerate interest in, and development of, offshore wind    resources. By facilitating information and knowledge transfer    and lessons learned among the member countries GOWA is    providing foundational support for joint ventures, agreements    to share and mitigate risks, and ensure responsible development    with sustainability and ecosystem stewardship in mind.  <\/p>\n<p>    DeCotis continued: Understanding supply chain constraints and    materials sourcing and having greater visibility into    geopolitical risks to meet offshore wind demands will expedite    development.  <\/p>\n<p>    Four Chinese companies, including Mingyang, are among the    worlds five largest original equipment manufacturers of    offshore wind equipment, according to the Global Wind Energy    Council (GWEC). The GWEC said recently that China increased its    global share of the new wind turbine market to 65% in 2023, up    from 53% in 2021. The group said that figure is probably closer    to 70% when equipment such as foundations and towers is    included.  <\/p>\n<p>    South Korea was asked to be an original member of GOWA, but    declined over concerns that some Korean companies would then be    excluded from the Chinese market. Officials, though, have said    they are reconsidering as more China-based companies are doing    business in South Korea. Vensys Energy AG, owned by    China-headquartered Goldwind, is set to supply all 64 turbines    for a 365-GW South Korean offshore wind farm currently under    construction. Heongtong Group, the largest power and fiber    optic cable manufacturer in China, has been chosen to provide    the submarine cables for the wind farm. South Korean officials    also have said concerns about an escalating trade war between    the U.S. and China support joining GOWA.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Korea Economic Daily reported that an industry    source in South Korea said, GOWA indicates the global wind    power market will be divided to reduce Chinese influence. The    governments decision to join the alliance signals Koreas    breakup with the Chinese market. Officials in Korea also think    it would attract more equipment manufacturers to that country,    noting that Danish wind turbine maker Vestas Wind Systems A\/S,    a private member of GOWA, relocated its Asia-Pacific    headquarters from Singapore to Korea in September of 2023.  <\/p>\n<p>    Choi Deok-hwan, head of international cooperation at the Korea    Wind Energy Industry Association, told the Korea Economic    Daily, Through GOWA, cooperation will be elevated to a    national level from a corporate level. Opportunities for large    deals will increase.  <\/p>\n<p>    Darrell Proctor is a senior associate    editor for POWER (@POWERmagazine).  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Excerpt from: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.powermag.com\/offshore-wind-group-looks-to-challenge-chinas-dominance-of-sector\" title=\"Offshore Wind Group Looks to Challenge Chinas Dominance of Sector - POWER magazine\">Offshore Wind Group Looks to Challenge Chinas Dominance of Sector - POWER magazine<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Countries active in the offshore wind industry continue to consider steps to counter Chinas dominance of the sector. The latest to announce a move is South Korea, where officials recently announced they may work with a global offshore wind industry group in order to better compete with China <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/offshore\/offshore-wind-group-looks-to-challenge-chinas-dominance-of-sector-power-magazine\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187814],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1127072","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-offshore"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1127072"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1127072"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1127072\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1127072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1127072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1127072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}