{"id":1127064,"date":"2024-07-17T23:40:04","date_gmt":"2024-07-18T03:40:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/ray-kurzweil-still-lives-in-utopia-nautilus\/"},"modified":"2024-07-17T23:40:04","modified_gmt":"2024-07-18T03:40:04","slug":"ray-kurzweil-still-lives-in-utopia-nautilus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/singularity\/ray-kurzweil-still-lives-in-utopia-nautilus\/","title":{"rendered":"Ray Kurzweil Still Lives in Utopia &#8211; Nautilus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    One of the most epic claims Ray    Kurzweil makes in his new book, The Singularity Is    Nearer is that the first person who will live to 1,000 may    have already been born. Thats because, he writes, by 2030,    humans will attain longevity escape velocity, and science    will have figured out how to add more than a year to lifespan    for each year that passes thanks to AI-led medical and    pharmaceutical innovations.  <\/p>\n<p>    Of course, Kurzweil is no stranger to outrageous predictions    about the future and there are many more here, some of which,    were they to pass, would make the prospect of such incredible    longevity a little more palatable. By the late 2020s, he    writes, data-driven vertical farming will cause the cost of    food to plummet and 3-D printing will make housing shortages a    thing of the past. In the 2030s, he asserts, it will be    relatively inexpensive to live at a level that is considered    luxurious today.  <\/p>\n<p>    Kurzweil hasnt changed his tone or expectations much over the    past 20 years. In his 2005 book The Singularity Is    Near, he predicted that the    Singularitythe term applied to the theoretical threshold    when technology would outpace its human creators, resulting in    an unpredictable, possibly uncontrollable explosion of    superintelligent machineswould arrive by 2045. Now he writes    it will arrive some time in the 2040s.  <\/p>\n<p>      AI will change the way we approach a fundamental question:      Who am I?    <\/p>\n<p>    Early on in the new book, Kurzweil clarifies that his    definition for the Singularity differs somewhat from other    conceptions. While many futurists consider it the moment AI    becomes capable of self-guided replication and growth, Kurzweil    conceives of it as more of a fusion between tech and humanity,    a time when this technology will let us merge with the    superintelligence, allowing us to be freed from the enclosure    of our skulls by artificial augmentation to our biology,    ultimately expanding our intelligence millions-fold.  <\/p>\n<p>    Along the way, he claims, several key innovations will happen.    His new book essentially charts the path this snowballing    technological revolution will take, providing rough estimates    for when we may encounter certain landmark developments.  <\/p>\n<p>    On that note, he explores at length present concerns about the    future of work, claiming that, As AI unlocks unprecedented    material abundance across countless areas, the struggle for    physical survival will fade into history. Instead, our main    struggle will be for purpose and meaning, and by the 2030s,    we will be able to create meaningful expressions that we cannot    imagine or understand today.  <\/p>\n<p>    Around that same time, he writes that we will master the    concept of atom-by-atom placement which will let us    reorganize matter as we see fit, essentially allowing us to    print clothing, furniture, solar panels, hot meals, and even    human organs. Within a decade, this micro-manipulation will    extend to medical nanobots who will regulate and repair our    bodies from within, and by the 2040s and 2050s, we will    rebuild our bodies and brains to go vastly beyond what our    biological bodies are capable of.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is the singularity as Kurzweil imagines it, when the AIs    will become part of us, and thus it is we who will be doing    those things.  <\/p>\n<p>    At the heart of Kurzweils framework is the suggestion that    AIs progressive arrival will change the way we approach a    fundamental question: Who am I? This technology, he claims,    will, through both its material and conceptual impacts, alter    the way we think of ourselves.  <\/p>\n<p>    Consider our phones, which already augment the otherwise    limited capacity of our memories. You dont need to remember    driving directions, because theyre stored in the cloud.    Increasingly, writes Kurzweil, we will exist more and more in    or even as this cloud, especially when the biological    crutches afforded by AI become integrated into our bodies via    implants and nanobots. Who are you if your identity is    partially stored in the cloud, and if it can even be restored    into a newly fabricated body in the event of accidental death?  <\/p>\n<p>    If Kurzweil is even remotely right, then 10 years from now our    livesour very societywill be totally unrecognizable.  <\/p>\n<p>    One shortcoming of    Kurzweils vision, of course, is that he seems to believe that    technological progress proceeds in a straight line, when its    history is chock full of diversions and dead endsa criticism    levered at his earlier work.  <\/p>\n<p>    And then there is the question of his enthusiasm itself. In    Nearer, Kurzweil is unabashedly optimistic about the    potential benefits afforded by AI. While he does devote some 20    pages to its perilsnotably a misalignment of programming    values resulting in undesirable AI behavior, the misuse of    AI-powered biotech by terrorists to create novel viruses or    other large scale hazards, or nanobots loosed to violent ends    or perhaps even total, if accidental, planetary devastationhe    dismisses these as unlikely incidentals on the way to our grand    utopia.  <\/p>\n<p>    Wide-eyed optimism and inattention to the nonlinear path of    progress aside, its hard to escape the appeal of Kurzweils    vision. Nanorobots keeping us all healthy forever on our    techno-quest for meaning? Sounds exciting on paper! And who    doesnt want to believe in the powers of science to improve,    enhance, and extend our lives?  <\/p>\n<p>    But look back in time as far as you like, and you will see that    history is decidedly short on utopias.   <\/p>\n<p>    Lead image: DannyOliva \/ Shutterstock  <\/p>\n<p>          Posted on July          17, 2024        <\/p>\n<p>        Arts, science, and travel writer Nick Hilden contributes to        the likes of the Washington Post, Scientific American,        Esquire, Popular Science, National Geographic, and        more. You can follow him on Twitter at @nickhilden or        Instagram at @nick.hilden.      <\/p>\n<p>        Cutting-edge science, unraveled by the very brightest        living thinkers.      <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/nautil.us\/ray-kurzweil-still-lives-in-utopia-716444\/\" title=\"Ray Kurzweil Still Lives in Utopia - Nautilus\">Ray Kurzweil Still Lives in Utopia - Nautilus<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> One of the most epic claims Ray Kurzweil makes in his new book, The Singularity Is Nearer is that the first person who will live to 1,000 may have already been born. Thats because, he writes, by 2030, humans will attain longevity escape velocity, and science will have figured out how to add more than a year to lifespan for each year that passes thanks to AI-led medical and pharmaceutical innovations. Of course, Kurzweil is no stranger to outrageous predictions about the future and there are many more here, some of which, were they to pass, would make the prospect of such incredible longevity a little more palatable <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/singularity\/ray-kurzweil-still-lives-in-utopia-nautilus\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187807],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1127064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-singularity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1127064"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1127064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1127064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1127064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1127064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1127064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}