{"id":1126130,"date":"2024-06-18T05:56:24","date_gmt":"2024-06-18T09:56:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/eu-urged-not-to-discriminate-against-big-tech-through-new-cybersecurity-certification-scheme-tech-monitor\/"},"modified":"2024-06-18T05:56:24","modified_gmt":"2024-06-18T09:56:24","slug":"eu-urged-not-to-discriminate-against-big-tech-through-new-cybersecurity-certification-scheme-tech-monitor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/eu-urged-not-to-discriminate-against-big-tech-through-new-cybersecurity-certification-scheme-tech-monitor\/","title":{"rendered":"EU urged not to discriminate against Big Tech through new cybersecurity certification scheme &#8211; Tech Monitor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Almost 30 European industry groups warned that the     EU should not discriminate against major US tech companies    in the upcoming European Cybersecurity Certification Scheme on    Cloud Services (EUCS).  <\/p>\n<p>    The certification scheme is an initiative by the European Union    Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) which aims to improve the    cloud services market conditions within the EU market and to    help European companies and governments select a trusted    provider.  <\/p>\n<p>    The first draft of the scheme was published in 2020 and    included propositions to harmonise the security of cloud    services with EU regulations, international standards, industry    best practices, as well as with existing certification in EU    Member States, the document read. However, the first draft has    been modified more than once in the past four years, and the    latest version of the scheme is set to be discussed and    reconsidered this week by EU countries, the ENISA and the    European Commission.  <\/p>\n<p>    Prior to this meeting, 26 industry groups from around Europe    signed a letter on Monday emphasising the importance of having    access to a diverse range of resilient cloud technologies    tailored to their specific needs to thrive in an increasingly    competitive global market, Reuters reported. Signatories include    the European Payment Institutions Federation, the German    Bundesverband deutscher Banken and the Irish business lobby    group IBEC.  <\/p>\n<p>    The letter to EU countries and legislators says: We believe    that an inclusive and non-discriminatory EUCS that supports the    free movement of cloud services in Europe will help our members    prosper at home and abroad, contribute to Europes digital    ambitions, and strengthen its resilience and security. The    letter also added that the removal of both ownership controls    and Protection against Unlawful Access (PUA) \/ Immunity to    Non-EU Law (INL) requirements ensures that cloud security    improvements align with industry best practices and    non-discriminatory principles.  <\/p>\n<p>    This warning comes as one of the main amendments made to the    latest version  the most controversial one  is the removal of    the sovereignty requirements proposed in the initial draft.    Under the newest version of the scheme, US tech giants can    qualify for the highest assurance level without having to set    up a joint venture or cooperate with an EU-based company.  <\/p>\n<p>    Big tech companies such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon welcomed the scrapping of    sovereignty requirements, as it allows them to bid for major EU    cloud computing contracts.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, EU cloud vendors have expressed concerns about this    amendment to the scheme and said they favour stricter    requirements for non-EU tech companies to qualify for the    certification.  <\/p>\n<p>    In a joint letter to relevant authorities signed in April 2024,    companies including Airbus, Orange and Capgemini argued for the    latest version of the scheme  without the sovereignty clauses     to be rejected. Reuters reportedly viewed the    letter, which stated: Incorporating EU headquarters and    European control requirements in the main scheme is necessary    to reduce the risk of unlawful data access under foreign laws.    The letter also argued that removing sovereignty requirements    from the scheme would significantly undermine the viability of    sovereign cloud solutions in Europe, many of which are either    in development or already available on the market.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/techmonitor.ai\/technology\/cloud\/eu-urged-not-to-discriminate-against-big-tech-through-new-cybersecurity-certification-scheme\" title=\"EU urged not to discriminate against Big Tech through new cybersecurity certification scheme - Tech Monitor\">EU urged not to discriminate against Big Tech through new cybersecurity certification scheme - Tech Monitor<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Almost 30 European industry groups warned that the EU should not discriminate against major US tech companies in the upcoming European Cybersecurity Certification Scheme on Cloud Services (EUCS). The certification scheme is an initiative by the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) which aims to improve the cloud services market conditions within the EU market and to help European companies and governments select a trusted provider <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/eu-urged-not-to-discriminate-against-big-tech-through-new-cybersecurity-certification-scheme-tech-monitor\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1126130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1126130"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1126130"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1126130\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1126130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1126130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1126130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}