{"id":1125375,"date":"2024-05-27T13:49:35","date_gmt":"2024-05-27T17:49:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/50-years-ago-ussr-kills-its-moon-rocket-russianspaceweb-com\/"},"modified":"2024-05-27T13:49:35","modified_gmt":"2024-05-27T17:49:35","slug":"50-years-ago-ussr-kills-its-moon-rocket-russianspaceweb-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/space-exploration\/50-years-ago-ussr-kills-its-moon-rocket-russianspaceweb-com\/","title":{"rendered":"50 years ago: USSR kills its Moon rocket &#8211; RussianSpaceWeb.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>          50 years ago: USSR kills its          Moon rocket        <\/p>\n<p>          On May 21, 1974, the Soviet government issued a historic          decree ousting the leader the nation's piloted space          program and essentially discontinuing its secret effort          to put a cosmonaut on the Moon. In the re-shuffle,          Valentin Glushko, a long-time rival of Sergei Korolev,          the de facto founder of the Soviet space program,          replaced Vasily Mishin, who had led the N1\/L3 lunar          expeditionary project from the time of Korolev's death in          early 1966.        <\/p>\n<p>          Previous chapter: Plans          for the 5th launch of the N1 rocket (INSIDER CONTENT)        <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          The EU-16 experimental unit representing the third stage          of the N1 rocket (Block V) after ground tests.        <\/p>\n<p>          Mostly unbeknownst to engineers and mid-level managers          working on Vehicle No.          8L for the fifth test launch of the N1 rocket, the          political climate around the project had worsened          drastically by 1974. By that time, the United States had          long ended the Apollo program, discontinued the          production of the Saturn rocket family and fully embarked          on the development of a reusable space transportation          system, promising to revolutionize every aspect of space          exploration.        <\/p>\n<p>          In early May 1974, the Secretary of the Central Committee          for the defense industry Dmitry Ustinov gathered top          industry officials for a critical meeting on the fate of          the N1 rocket. Among those present were the Head of the          Academy of Sciences Mstislav Keldysh, the Chairman of the          Military Industrial Commission Leonid Smirnov, and his          deputy Boris Komissarov, Sergei Afanasiev, Minister of          MOM, which supervised the rocket industry, his deputy          Georgy Tyulin, and the Director of the TsNIIMash research          institute Yuri Mozhorin. The Minister of Aviation          Industry Dementiev was also there, because he supervised          the OKB-276 design bureau which worked on engines for the          N1 rocket, the most problematic element of the entire          Soviet lunar program. Neither Vasily Mishin, Chief Designer at          TsKBEM, nor Nikolai Kuznetsov, who led OKB-276, were          invited. (685)        <\/p>\n<p>          Well before that faithful gathering, the industry          leadership and the political brass in the Kremlin were          convinced that OKB-276 would not be able to improve the          reliability of the engines to the point where the 30          units installed on the first stage of the rocket would          operate flawlessly on multiple flights. (36) (The subsequent flight          history of the the US Antares          rocket, which adopted leftover engines from the N1          rocket, did show that it would take far fewer than 30          units to have a catastrophic explosion in flight.)        <\/p>\n<p>          Therefore, it is not surprising that, according to          Mozhorin, all those present supported discontinuing the          N1\/L3 project, including Afanasiev and Dementiev, despite          major involvement of \"their\" industrial conglomerates          into the ongoing          lunar effort.        <\/p>\n<p>          Keldysh admitted the absence of science projects          justifying the N1, while also claiming that, for          scientists, the Moon was no longer a priority which would          require the construction of a lunar base. At the same time, the          proposed exploration of Mars          would have to be preceded by the development of a          reusable space transportation system and by the          construction of a large Earth-orbiting station, Keldysh          apparently argued, clearly echoing the latest US space          strategy.        <\/p>\n<p>          Mozhorin reportedly tried to argue for proceeding with          the launch of Vehicle No. 8L, citing the availability of          new engines, which greatly increased chances of success,          though he obviously could not guarantee a successful          flight.        <\/p>\n<p>          In any case, the final verdict from Ustinov was          predetermined  to curtail the N1 project. Due to the          huge implications of such a decision for the rocket          industry and beyond, the move would require a joint          decree from the Soviet of Ministers and Central Committee          of the Communist Party.        <\/p>\n<p>          The death of the N1 also sealed the fate of Vasily          Mishin, who was the strongest proponent of the Soviet          lunar program. As the Chief Designer at TsKBEM, Mishin          bore personal responsibility for the N1 rocket since he          was the successor to the late Sergei Korolev, who stood at its roots          in the early 1960s. Essentially, Mishin would have to          take the blame for the aborted multi-year effort, given          the fact that his relations with Ustinov and with some of          his own associates had already been strained due to          policy disagreements, in particular, after the 1969 decision to pursue a          space station          project at TsKBEM. To replace him, Ustinov picked          Valentin Glushko, an old rival of Korolev and a fierce          critic of the N1 rocket. Glushko would obviously have a          strong motivation in steering the firm during its painful          U-turn after the cancellation of the N1, while commanding          a level of respect within the whole industry during what          surely expected to be a difficult transition.        <\/p>\n<p>          At the time, Glushko led the OKB-456 propulsion center,          but as one of the pioneers of Soviet rocketry himself, he          had well known ambitions and the necessary experience to          run the Soviet space program.        <\/p>\n<p>          News about the impending shakeup at TsKBEM first reached          Mishin's deputy Boris Chertok.          Around May 15, Chertok got a call from Nikolai Pilyugin,          his main supplier of flight control avionics, who gave          him the scoop about the imminent replacement of Mishin          with Glushko. The next day, at lunch, Chertok could only          confirm that Mishin was out of office for some business          at the ministry, but still in some disbelief, he called          Pilyugin back. This time, Pilyugin broke him the news          that the N1 rocket was on the chopping block and that          Glushko was fully ready (and eager) to implement the          decision, aomething he had already confided to Pilyugin.          He advised Chertok to urgently get in touch with Glushko,          who, according to Pilyugin, was expecting his call.        <\/p>\n<p>          With some reluctance, Chertok dialed Glushko on a          classified line and immediately got an invitation for a          talk at Glushko's office at OKB-456 propulsion bureau in          Khimki.        <\/p>\n<p>          In a 20-minute conversation, Glushko tried to assure          Chertok that it was not his initiative to get into          Korolev's chair and that he was just following the          Politburo's orders. At the same time, Glushko confirmed          to Chertok the intention to kill the N1 and \"quickly\"          develop a new family of launch vehicles, capable of          supporting a permanent base on the Moon with regularly          exchanged scientific crews. To Chertok's argument that          TsKBEM already had a strategy for building a base using          multiple N1 launches within four or five years, Glushko          replied that it would not be possible to build anything          with \"rotten\" engines.        <\/p>\n<p>          During the May 16 meeting, Glushko told Chertok that the          official decision on the management reshuffle at TsKBEM          could be issued as soon as the next day, but it would not          appear until May 21, 1974. According to the decree,          Glushko took the newly created position of Director          General, instead of Designer General previously occupied          by Mishin. TsKBEM itself was merged with OKB-456 and it          was reorganized into the Energia Scientific and          Production Association, or NPO Energia.        <\/p>\n<p>          The day after the official decree, Glushko summoned          former Mishin's deputies to the old Korolev's office and          outlined his own vision for space exploration which had          no use for the N1 rocket. All prospective payloads of the          N1 rocket, such as lunar exploration vehicles, modules of          the giant MKBS space station, Mars          sample return probes and heavy space observatories          would have to be re-tailored for new rockets at the cost          of at least eight more years and untold millions of          rubles.        <\/p>\n<p>          For a few weeks, Chertok and other veterans of the N1          project held some faint hope that the ministry or the          Kremlin would overrule Glushko, but to no avail.        <\/p>\n<p>          On June 24, 1974, Glushko summoned Boris Dorofeev, the          Chief Engineer for the N1 rocket, and offered him to          write a directive for the company about the cancellation          of the project. When Dorofeev refused, Glushko wrote the          document and signed it himself. Such a momentous decision          for the entire industry was made without a traditional          Chief Designer Council meeting or even an informal          gathering of the technical leadership in the bureau. The          Military Industry Commission, VPK, which would normally          be involved in decisions of this scale, was also          essentially bypassed. Obviously, Glushko and Ustinov had          little interest in hearing the reaction to this clearly          unpopular move. Still, in the relatively benign political          atmosphere of the 1970s by the standards of the Soviet          regime, the move triggered a shockwave of complaints from          multiple contractors to their ministries and to the          government and even caused some spontaneous protests.        <\/p>\n<p>          The local Communist Party committee of the 6th Test Directorate in          Tyuratam, which was responsible for flight testing          the N1 rocket, held an night-long emergency session which          produced a rare protest letter from the officers to the          Presidium of the 25th Party Congress. Clearly, this          unsanctioned move could potentially end with          insubordination charges against the officers, but in this          case, they got away with a lecture about the new          directions of the Soviet space program.        <\/p>\n<p>          It is also known that Andronik Iosifyan, the head of a          major contractor involved in the N1 project, sent a          personal protest letter to the Central Committee.          Fortunately, his acquaintance at the high echelons of          party bureaucracy called Iosifyan on a classified line          and asked to come and pick up his letter in order to          avoid some real consequences. (685)        <\/p>\n<p>          In the meantime, Glushko appeared to set about not just          canceling N1 but also erasing any memory of its          existence. He reportedly ordered the complete disposal of          the surviving N1 hardware and associated documentation          with no effort to preserve any artifact for posterity,          though, given the gargantuan size of the vehicle, it          would probably require a considerable expense.        <\/p>\n<p>          In 1976, the fully assembled N1 rockets No. 4L and 8L,          along with the 1M1 full-scale prototype, as well as the          components for as many as seven rockets, had been all          dismantled. Some pieces of the rockets were recycled into          strange gazebos, storage sheds and playgrounds spread          across Tyuratam.        <\/p>\n<p>          Glushko also displayed an equal animosity toward Mishin.          On Aug. 19, 1974, just four days after the former head of          TsKBEM made his last trip to Podlipki, where he had          worked since the bureau's foundation in 1946, to          finalize his transfer to a new job at Moscow Aviation          Institute, MAI, starting in September, he got a call from          a colleague, who said that he was instructed not to let          Mishin on campus without an explicit permission from          Glushko. (774)        <\/p>\n<p>          Epilogue to the N1        <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          Although proponents of the N1 project believed that they          were closer than ever to resolving engine problems on the          N1 and that the work was progressing well toward the          fifth test flight          (INSIDER CONTENT) of          the rocket, the Soviet leadership had already decided to          move on and to essentially mirror the development of the          reusable Shuttle orbiter that had been initiated in the          United States and was increasingly perceived by Moscow as          a military threat.        <\/p>\n<p>          After spending an estimated four billion rubles and a          decade-worth of efforts by the industry, the N1-L3          project was abandoned without fulfilling its objectives.        <\/p>\n<p>          Ironically, the newly imposed strategy of duplicating the          Space Shuttle would also bury Glushko's own ambitions in          space exploration. His grand vision that he had spent          almost a lifetime formulating was quickly re-directed          from permanent lunar settlements to a misguided and          ultimately wasteful response to the US in the form of the          Energia-Buran program...        <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          Next chapter: Energia-Buran          program        <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continue reading here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.russianspaceweb.com\/l3-cancellation.html\" title=\"50 years ago: USSR kills its Moon rocket - RussianSpaceWeb.com\">50 years ago: USSR kills its Moon rocket - RussianSpaceWeb.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> 50 years ago: USSR kills its Moon rocket On May 21, 1974, the Soviet government issued a historic decree ousting the leader the nation's piloted space program and essentially discontinuing its secret effort to put a cosmonaut on the Moon. In the re-shuffle, Valentin Glushko, a long-time rival of Sergei Korolev, the de facto founder of the Soviet space program, replaced Vasily Mishin, who had led the N1\/L3 lunar expeditionary project from the time of Korolev's death in early 1966. Previous chapter: Plans for the 5th launch of the N1 rocket (INSIDER CONTENT) The EU-16 experimental unit representing the third stage of the N1 rocket (Block V) after ground tests <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/space-exploration\/50-years-ago-ussr-kills-its-moon-rocket-russianspaceweb-com\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187764],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1125375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-space-exploration"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1125375"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1125375"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1125375\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1125375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1125375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1125375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}