{"id":1123908,"date":"2024-04-12T05:52:50","date_gmt":"2024-04-12T09:52:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/google-wallet-on-wear-os-isnt-as-convenient-as-it-could-be-android-police\/"},"modified":"2024-04-12T05:52:50","modified_gmt":"2024-04-12T09:52:50","slug":"google-wallet-on-wear-os-isnt-as-convenient-as-it-could-be-android-police","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/google\/google-wallet-on-wear-os-isnt-as-convenient-as-it-could-be-android-police\/","title":{"rendered":"Google Wallet on Wear OS isn&#8217;t as convenient as it could be &#8211; Android Police"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Summary                    <\/p>\n<p>    Of all the tech-enabled conveniences we've come to take for    granted, tap-to-pay in wearables is, for my money, one of the    most satisfyingly futuristic  the very idea of using your    wristwatch to pay for something flatly didn't exist until    relatively recently. Even now, nearly a decade into living with    watches that are also wallets, I still get a little techy    satisfaction any time I pay for something using my Pixel    Watch. But as much as I appreciate the ability to use my    wrist    computer to pay for coffee, I think the Google Wallet    experience on Wear OS could be significantly improved with what    seems to me like a simple UX tweak.  <\/p>\n<p>    As it stands today,     buying something with Google Wallet on Wear OS requires you    to open the Google Wallet app before tapping your watch to a    contactless payment terminal. Different watches work    differently, but in the case of the Pixel Watch 2 I'm typically    wearing, you can most easily fire up Wallet by double-tapping    the watch's digital crown. Once it's open, tap-to-pay is ready.    All told, it's hardly an inconvenient system as is.  <\/p>\n<p>    But having to get the app open first introduces just a    little extra friction that makes the experience feel    less seamless than it could. On mobile, provided you have a    default card set in Wallet and aren't using the Pixel 7 Pro's    wonky face unlock feature, tapping your unlocked phone to a    payment terminal will initiate a payment with your default    method, whether or not you have the Wallet app open.    Essentially, I want to see that approach on Wear OS, too.  <\/p>\n<p>    That may sound risky, but hear me out. Just like on a phone,    using Google Wallet on Wear OS requires that your watch has a    screen lock set. Once you've unlocked your watch, it stays    unlocked until you take it off, at which time it immediately    locks again. Having to manually open Wallet before making a    payment does further mitigate some risks, like making a    tap-to-pay payment you didn't intend to or having your payment    information read without your permission by nearby bad actors.    But given NFC in smartwatches only has a range of a couple of    inches, I feel those threats are very remote.  <\/p>\n<p>    Personally, I'd be willing to chance it for the option to use    tap-to-pay any time my watch is unlocked. Physical credit cards    have no payment method-side authentication for contactless    payments at all, so compared to that, my watch locking when    it's off my wrist already feels plenty secure without the    additional step of opening Google Wallet first.  <\/p>\n<p>    In light of NFC's range limitations and Google Wallet's    inherent security  the digital cards on your watch have    numbers unique from your physical cards  I feel like the risk    in allowing easier contactless payments on Wear OS would be    pretty minimal. Still, I'd be perfectly happy to see what I'm    proposing here as an option while the status quo stays the    default. Heck, Google could even throw in a strongly worded    warning when you change the setting.  <\/p>\n<p>    As it stands, though, using Google Wallet on your watch takes    two hands, which runs counter to the purpose of a feature that    should be all about convenience. You can fish a phone out of    your pocket, unlock it, and tap it to a card reader all without    setting down your coffee (or your shopping bags, or your child,    et cetera)  but one-handed payments aren't possible on Wear    OS. It's a niche complaint, but I'd love to see it addressed,    even if recent changes abroad    make it seem like Google is increasingly prioritizing security    over flexibility when it comes to payments.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.androidpolice.com\/google-wallet-wear-os-easy\/\" title=\"Google Wallet on Wear OS isn't as convenient as it could be - Android Police\">Google Wallet on Wear OS isn't as convenient as it could be - Android Police<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Summary Of all the tech-enabled conveniences we've come to take for granted, tap-to-pay in wearables is, for my money, one of the most satisfyingly futuristic the very idea of using your wristwatch to pay for something flatly didn't exist until relatively recently. Even now, nearly a decade into living with watches that are also wallets, I still get a little techy satisfaction any time I pay for something using my Pixel Watch. But as much as I appreciate the ability to use my wrist computer to pay for coffee, I think the Google Wallet experience on Wear OS could be significantly improved with what seems to me like a simple UX tweak.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/google\/google-wallet-on-wear-os-isnt-as-convenient-as-it-could-be-android-police\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[345634],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1123908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-google"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1123908"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1123908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1123908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1123908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1123908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1123908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}