OPINION: <\/p>\n
Americans need to be aware of the unbridled propensity of federal intelligence agencies to spy on all of us without search warrants as required by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. <\/p>\n
These agencies believe that the Fourth Amendment which protects the individual right to privacy regulates only law enforcement and does not apply to domestic spying. <\/p>\n
There is no basis in the constitutional text, history or judicial interpretations for such a limiting and toothless view of this constitutional guarantee. The courts have held that the Fourth Amendment restrains government all government. Last week, the CIA asked Congress to expand its current spying in the United States. <\/p>\n
Here is the backstory. <\/p>\n
When the CIA was created in 1947, members of Congress who feared the establishment here of the type of domestic surveillance apparatus that the Allies had just defeated in Germany insisted that the new CIA have no role in American law enforcement and no legal ability to spy win the U.S. The legislation creating the CIA contains those unambiguous limitations. <\/p>\n
Nevertheless, we know that CIA agents are present in all 50 of our state legislatures. They didnt arrive there until after Dec. 4, 1981. Thats the date that President Ronald Reagan signed Executive Order 12333, which purports to give the CIA authority to spy in the United States supposedly looking for narcotics from foreign countries but keeps from law enforcement whatever it finds. <\/p>\n
Stated differently, while Reagan purported to authorize the CIA to defy the limitations imposed upon it by the Constitution and by federal law, he insisted on a wall of separation between domestic spying and law enforcement. <\/p>\n
So, if the CIA using unconstitutional spying discovered that a janitor in the Russian Embassy in Washington was really a KGB colonel who abused his wife in their suburban Maryland home, under E.O. 12333, it could continue to spy upon him in defiance of the Fourth Amendment and the CIA charter, but it could not reveal to Maryland prosecutors who can use only evidence that was lawfully obtained any evidence of his domestic violence. <\/p>\n
All this changed 20 years later when President George W. Bush demolished Reagans wall between law enforcement and domestic spying and directed the CIA and other domestic spying agencies to share the fruits of their spying with the FBI. <\/p>\n
Thus, thanks to Reagan, Mr. Bush, and their successors looking the other way, CIA agents have been engaging in fishing expeditions on a grand scale in the U.S. for the past 20 years. Congress knows about this because all intelligence agencies are required by statute to report the extent of their spying secretly to the House and Senate intelligence committees. <\/p>\n
This, of course, does not absolve the CIA of its presidentially authorized computer hacking crimes; rather, it gives Congress a false sense of security that it has a handle on whats going on. <\/p>\n
Whats going on is not government lawyers appearing before judges asking for surveillance warrants based upon probable cause of crime, as the Constitution requires. Whats going on is CIA agents going to Big Tech and paying for access to communications used by ordinary Americans. Some Big Tech companies told the CIA to take a hike. Others took the CIAs cash and opened the spigots of their fiber-optic data to the voracious federal appetite. <\/p>\n
If government lawyers went to a judge and demonstrated probable cause of crime for example, that a janitor in the Russian Embassy was passing defense secrets to Moscow surely the judge would have signed a surveillance warrant. But to the government, following the Constitution is too limiting. <\/p>\n
Thus, by acquiring bulk data fiber-optic data on hundreds of millions of Americans acquired without search warrants the government avoids the time and trouble of demonstrating probable cause to a judge. But that time and trouble were intentionally baked into the Fourth Amendment so as to keep the government off our backs. <\/p>\n
Not to be outdone by its principal rival, the FBI soon began doing the same thing: gathering bulk data without search warrants. <\/p>\n
When Congress learned of this, it enacted legislation that banned the warrantless acquisition of bulk data. Apparently, Congress is naive enough to believe that the CIA, the FBI and the National Security Agency, their cousin with 60,000 domestic spies, will actually comply with federal law. <\/p>\n
Last week, that naivete was manifested front and center when the CIA sent a letter to both congressional intelligence committees addressing its spying on foreign persons and the Americans with whom they communicate, and asking to expand that reach in the U.S. <\/p>\n
The timing of the CIAs letter coincides with a decision Congress must make in the next 10 days whether to reenact Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, allow it to expire on April 19 or expand it as the CIA has requested. Section 702 permits warrantless spying on foreigners and the Americans whom intelligence agencies suspect communicate with them. Section 702 is an unconstitutional free pass for domestic spying. <\/p>\n
So, notwithstanding the persistent efforts of members of Congress from both parties to limit and in some cases to prohibit the warrantless acquisition of bulk data by the CIA from Americans, the practice continues, the CIA defends it and presidents look the other way. <\/p>\n
Congress created the CIA monster, which today is so big and so powerful and so indifferent to the Constitution and the federal laws its agents have sworn to uphold that it can boast about its lawlessness, have no fear of defying Congress and always escape the consequences of all this largely unscathed. Even President Harry Truman, who signed the 1947 legislation into law, later acknowledged as much and condemned what the CIA had become. <\/p>\n
I suspect the CIA and its cousins will get away with this because they spy on Congress and possess damning personal data on members who regularly vote to increase their secret budgets. <\/p>\n
When will we have a government whose officials are courageous enough to uphold the Constitution? <\/p>\n
To learn more about Judge Andrew Napolitano, visit https:\/\/JudgeNap.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n See the article here: OPINION: Americans need to be aware of the unbridled propensity of federal intelligence agencies to spy on all of us without search warrants as required by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. These agencies believe that the Fourth Amendment which protects the individual right to privacy regulates only law enforcement and does not apply to domestic spying. Continue reading
\nCIA wants more power to spy on Americans - Washington Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"