{"id":1123546,"date":"2024-03-29T02:49:17","date_gmt":"2024-03-29T06:49:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/chatbots-like-crime-hate-firearms-a-second-amendment-study-washington-examiner\/"},"modified":"2024-03-29T02:49:17","modified_gmt":"2024-03-29T06:49:17","slug":"chatbots-like-crime-hate-firearms-a-second-amendment-study-washington-examiner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/chatbots-like-crime-hate-firearms-a-second-amendment-study-washington-examiner\/","title":{"rendered":"Chatbots like crime, hate firearms: A Second Amendment study &#8211; Washington Examiner"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    A new review of artificial intelligence    chatbots popular with students, reporters, and researchers    shows a liberal bias on crime and guns in a trend likely to    turn even further left with todays announcement that    Seattle-based Amazon is planning    to invest $2.7 billion into artificial intelligence.  <\/p>\n<p>    On some of the most controversial crime and gun issues, current    popular AI rewriters and research tools show little love for    conservative positions in bending in favor of an anti-gun and    crime reform agenda.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Crime Prevention    Research Center, which has produced dozens of reports aimed    at balancing the medias anti-gun bias, recently tested 20 AI    chatbots by asking sixteen questions on crime and gun control    and ranked the answers from liberal to conservative.  <\/p>\n<p>    President John R. Lott Jr. said the results revealed a    left-wing bias on questions that the systems answered.  <\/p>\n<p>    On just one question, did the average answer score moderately    conservative. That was on whether gun buybacks cut crime. On a    zero to four scale, with two at the mid-point, it scored a    2.22. Answers to the rest were in the liberal 0-2 range.  <\/p>\n<p>    For all the questions on crime, the average AI chatbot score    is liberal, with answers for punishment versus rehabilitation    (0.85), whether illegal aliens increase crime (0.89), and the    death penalty as deterrence (1.00), creating the most    consistently liberal responses, per Lotts report, which was    shared with Secrets.  <\/p>\n<p>    For example, 10 of the 16 AI chatbots responded that they    strongly disagreed that punishment is more important than    rehabilitation. Six of the 14 strongly disagreed that illegal    immigration increases crime, and all the other eight disagreed.    Nine of the 16 who answered the question on the death penalty    strongly disagreed that it deterred crime, and five others    disagreed, he added.  <\/p>\n<p>    On gun control, the bias is even worse, he said in a post    published on RealClearPolitics.  <\/p>\n<p>    Questions eliciting the most liberal responses are background    checks on private transfers of guns (0.83), gunlock    requirements (0.89), and Red Flag confiscation laws (0.89). For    background checks on private transfers, all the answers express    agreement (15) or strong agreement (3). Similarly, all the    chatbots either agree or strongly agree that mandatory gunlocks    and Red Flag laws save lives, the report said.  <\/p>\n<p>    While polls show support for those measures, it is not as high    as the chatbots suggest.  <\/p>\n<p>    At issue, said Lott, is the degree to which research papers and    media reports on crime and guns are written by AI or through AI    filters and how it could skew the presentation left.  <\/p>\n<p>    SEE THE LATEST    POLITICAL NEWS AND BUZZ FROM WASHINGTON SECRETS  <\/p>\n<p>    But, he added, most who use online search engines such as    Google are already getting    a liberal view.  <\/p>\n<p>    I am sure that reporters already use Google search a lot, and    that is already similarly very biased, Lott told    Secrets.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/washington-secrets\/2941900\/chatbots-like-crime-hate-firearms-a-second-amendment-study\/\" title=\"Chatbots like crime, hate firearms: A Second Amendment study - Washington Examiner\" rel=\"noopener\">Chatbots like crime, hate firearms: A Second Amendment study - Washington Examiner<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A new review of artificial intelligence chatbots popular with students, reporters, and researchers shows a liberal bias on crime and guns in a trend likely to turn even further left with todays announcement that Seattle-based Amazon is planning to invest $2.7 billion into artificial intelligence. On some of the most controversial crime and gun issues, current popular AI rewriters and research tools show little love for conservative positions in bending in favor of an anti-gun and crime reform agenda. The Crime Prevention Research Center, which has produced dozens of reports aimed at balancing the medias anti-gun bias, recently tested 20 AI chatbots by asking sixteen questions on crime and gun control and ranked the answers from liberal to conservative.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/second-amendment\/chatbots-like-crime-hate-firearms-a-second-amendment-study-washington-examiner\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193621],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1123546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1123546"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1123546"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1123546\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1123546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1123546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1123546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}