Did you know that Cascade Bicycle Club not only hosts bike rides on streets but also advocates for investing in infrastructure to make streets safer for biking? What a scandal! <\/p>\n
Or at least the Editorial Board of the Seattle Times decided all of a sudden that this behavior is somehow scandalous. <\/p>\n
Whats not to like about a refreshing bike ride on a Sunday morning? <\/p>\n
Advertisement <\/p>\n
Turns out, its not so simple. <\/p>\n
Im picturing a colorful video of a happy family riding bikes that turns black-and-white while their eyes all start glowing red. What horrible truth have they uncovered? <\/p>\n
Well, Cascade is paying for event permits and police staffing and then charging people to participate. And maybe, if things go well, they will even raise some extra money on top. An event promoter hopes to make money by hosting an event. But thats not all. They are even going to use any extra funds to support their stated mission: Improving bicycling. <\/p>\n
But the policy the Ed Board is suggesting here would be a major infringement on free speech. Why would a board that claims to believe in the First Amendment and the importance of free speech be arguing that the city should deny permits to an organization because that organization engages in public policy advocacy? I was genuinely shocked when I read this. <\/p>\n
Are they arguing that any organization that tries to influence the transportation levy should not be able to receive street use permits? Or just the organizations they disagree with? The Downtown Seattle Association will surely lobby the city about the transportation levy, so should they also stop receiving street use permits? Should unions be denied permits for marches and rallies? Should marathon organizers be banned from lobbying? Imagine a city official saying, You better shut up or you can kiss your permits goodbye. Now THAT would be a scandal. <\/p>\n
I think yall should probably go ahead and take this one back, cuz I suspect you havent fully thought through the implications of the policy youre suggesting here. Or if you still stand by it, boy, what a sad state our citys only remaining daily paper is in. <\/p>\n
WSDOT and SDOT used to fund these kinds of rides, making them free to everyone. Theres a whole section about it in my book. I would actually prefer the free public-hosted version. But imagine the Seattle Times editorial if SDOT did this exact same event using public funds: We shouldnt spend honest tax payer money on such frivolities! The city should leave these kinds of events to Cascade Bicycle Club! <\/p>\n
Cascade itself was even founded initially to organize a Bicycle Sunday-style event on Mercer Island more than 50 years ago, then it immediately shifted into an advocacy organization that raises money in part by holding paid events. This is how Cascade has always worked. Its how they market it. Theres nothing secret or hidden about it. Its weird that the Ed Board decided today that it is some kind of scandal. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Visit link: Did you know that Cascade Bicycle Club not only hosts bike rides on streets but also advocates for investing in infrastructure to make streets safer for biking? What a scandal! Or at least the Editorial Board of the Seattle Times decided all of a sudden that this behavior is somehow scandalous. Continue reading
\nThe Times Ed Board picks a confusing fight against the Emerald City Ride, free speech - Seattle Bike Blog<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"