{"id":1123386,"date":"2024-03-24T16:43:55","date_gmt":"2024-03-24T20:43:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/x-men-the-animated-series-was-defined-by-its-censors-polygon\/"},"modified":"2024-03-24T16:43:55","modified_gmt":"2024-03-24T20:43:55","slug":"x-men-the-animated-series-was-defined-by-its-censors-polygon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/x-men-the-animated-series-was-defined-by-its-censors-polygon\/","title":{"rendered":"X-Men: The Animated Series was defined by its censors &#8211; Polygon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    After much anticipation,     X-Men 97, a direct continuation to     X-Men: The Animated Series from the 1990s, hits Disney    Plus this week. But its not the first time Marvel has dusted    off the old series and revived it for a nostalgic new    millennium.  <\/p>\n<p>    Marvel Comics itself took a swing with     X-Men 92, published in 2015 and technically a        Secret Wars tie-in (but dont worry about it). For    92, writers Chad Bowers and Chris Sims and artist    Scott Koblish had to figure out how to make a comic book story    that felt like a beloved cartoon show closely based on 90s    comics, without just replicating 90s comics themselves.    X-Men: The Animated Series definitely had its own vibe     but blocky animation doesnt translate to still images, and    once you put character designs ripped right out of the comics    back on the page, they just look like theyre from comics.    Rogue and Gambits outrageous    accents? From the comics. Storms operatic diction? The    comics.  <\/p>\n<p>    X-Men: The Animated Series was beloved because it was    a truly excellent introduction not just to the characters of    the X-Men, but their most compelling comic book storylines  or    at least as close as the folks behind the show could get given    television standards of the time. And so Bowers and Sims and    Koblish made an interesting choice: According to their    X-Men 92, the thing that makes a story feel like the    92 animated series is censorship.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the realm of cartoon adaptations of long-running comics    series, X-Men: The Animated Series has always set    itself apart by how closely it mimicked the comics it was based    on. You could almost call The Animated Series more of    a translation than an adaptation, with the way it directly    adapted even comics stories published during the shows run.  <\/p>\n<p>    Or at least, it adapted them as best as it could  given a very    different set of content standards.  <\/p>\n<p>    Shall we go down the list? No cussing, so everyone, even    Wolverine, uses incredible minced oaths.    Every bad guy must show signs of life after theyve been    knocked down. Minimize direct and implied references to    sex,    religion, drugs, torture, funerals, and also any word derived    from kill. And no blood! Sure, Wolverines got a healing    factor, but we cant show him getting bashed up too bad or    running around too naked (comics love this). Instead, lets    emphasize his enhanced senses. And make sure the Sentinels are    front and center; censors are totally fine with slicing and    dicing robots or electrocuting them with Storms lightning,    blasting holes through them with Cyclops force beams, bashing    them to bits with Rogues super strength, and exploding them    with Gambits playing cards.  <\/p>\n<p>    X-Men wasnt unusual for its era in the restrictions    placed on it. But those rules were one thing for shows where    Spider-Man or Batman punched bad guys until they hit the floor    and groaned. It was quite another for the X-Men, whose most    popular guy was a man made of knives who was constantly    receiving wounds. And it was even more fraught for a    close adaptation of X-Men stories, whose general    popularity is locked around soap operatic romantic and sexual    tension. Gambit and Rogue dont want to get engaged,    folks, they want to have piping-hot    impossible-because-of-her-mutation premarital sex.  <\/p>\n<p>    So when you set out to define what makes an X-Men: The    Animated Series-style story different from an X-Men    comics-style story, at some point youre just going to be    listing all the ways in which the comics stories had to change    for kids TV. As a comic series trying to replicate the    Animated Series tone, X-Men 92 simply leaned    into that, with a story about the X-Men fighting censorship    itself.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 92, the X-Men face a villain they never could have    fought in the animated series: Cassandra Nova, a character that    could not be more at odds with the 90s era of X-Men if she    tried. Cassandra was the first major villain of Grant Morrison    and Frank Quitelys New X-Men, a run still renowned    today for its radical redefinition of the X-Men. The first page    of their first X-Men comic is a splash image of Cyclops and    Wolverine casually dismembering a Sentinel, as Cyclops says,    pointedly, Wolverine, you can probably stop doing that now.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cassandra Nova was Morrison and Quitelys first attempt to fill    the antagonistic hole left by sweeping Sentinels off the table;    a moral inverse to Professor X, who wanted to destroy all that    he wanted to uphold. But for 92 Bowers and Sims and    Koblish gave Cassandra a new hook  this time, she doesnt want    to kill all mutants. She wants to bowdlerize all    mutants.  <\/p>\n<p>    She captures the X-Men and either brainwashes them into    compliance  Wolverine goes pacifist, Gambit puts a promise    ring on Rogue and they swear to keep it abstinent until    marriage  or traps them inside their own minds. In the end,    Wolverine regains his claws after re-realizing they can be used    to help people; Rogue and Gambit snap out of it when they    remember that theres more to being able to touch somebody than    sex and marriage. The X-Men win the day, gaining a victory over    simplistic reductions of morality.  <\/p>\n<p>    The team behind X-Men 97 certainly seemed to have    asked themselves some of the same questions as the team behind    X-Men 92: Is this kids show revival for kids, or the    grown adults who loved the first show? Do we preserve the    bowdlerized 90s tone? Will it even feel like the real X-Men    cartoon without it?  <\/p>\n<p>    Time has lent a measure of humor to the idea of a Wolverine who    cant cut anybody but robots and will only drink beer if    someone could reasonably mistake it for soda. Its quaint to    look back on a time when kids cartoons were so limited in what    they could portray, all because of a presumption of a    pearl-clutching public.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those presumptions have evolved  but its worth remembering    that they     havent gone away. There are new    frontiers in the slow battle of attrition between kids TV    showrunners and studio censors, and new creators pushing the    envelope. After all, youll find every episode of X-Men:    97 on Disney Plus, but     you wont find every episode of Bluey.  <\/p>\n<p>    Heres hoping that in another couple of decades, 2024s    broadcast standards seem as quaint as 1997s, bub.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.polygon.com\/24106782\/x-men-animated-series-97-92-censors-broadcast-standards-practices\" title=\"X-Men: The Animated Series was defined by its censors - Polygon\" rel=\"noopener\">X-Men: The Animated Series was defined by its censors - Polygon<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> After much anticipation, X-Men 97, a direct continuation to X-Men: The Animated Series from the 1990s, hits Disney Plus this week.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/x-men-the-animated-series-was-defined-by-its-censors-polygon\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1123386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1123386"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1123386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1123386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1123386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1123386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1123386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}