{"id":1122649,"date":"2024-03-02T14:27:36","date_gmt":"2024-03-02T19:27:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/one-third-of-adults-say-the-first-amendment-goes-too-far-washington-times\/"},"modified":"2024-03-02T14:27:36","modified_gmt":"2024-03-02T19:27:36","slug":"one-third-of-adults-say-the-first-amendment-goes-too-far-washington-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/one-third-of-adults-say-the-first-amendment-goes-too-far-washington-times\/","title":{"rendered":"One-third of adults say the First Amendment &#8216;goes too far&#8217; &#8211; Washington Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Americans have a constitutional right to express themselves    freely, but a newpoll    finds that many want to limit that freedom to those who offend    them.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Foundation    for Individual Rights and Expression and Dartmouth    Colleges Polarization Research Lab reported Tuesday that 31%    of adults surveyed said the First Amendment goes too far in    the rights it guarantees.  <\/p>\n<p>    Nearly a third of Republicans and a third of Democrats said    they completely or mostly agreed with the statement.  <\/p>\n<p>    The survey also found that most respondents wanted to ban    public speeches and college professors from expressing the    ideas that most offend them.  <\/p>\n<p>    Responding to a list of controversial statements that the First    Amendment protects, 19% of respondents described All whites    are racist oppressors as the most offensive, making it the one    they most wished to censor.  <\/p>\n<p>    Several other expressions followed close behind this one on the    most offensive list: 18% named America got what it deserved    on 9\/11, 12% flagged January 6th was a peaceful protest and    11% chose Abortion should be completely illegal.  <\/p>\n<p>    Farther down the list, 4% picked From the river to the sea    Palestine will be free  a slogan in recent pro-Palestinian    protests against Israel that some Jewish groups have condemned    as antisemitic.  <\/p>\n<p>    The survey found that 52% of respondents said their community    should ban public speeches promoting the statement they deemed    most offensive. Another 69% said their local college should not    allow a professor who promoted the idea to teach classes.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those results were disappointing, but not exactly surprising,    said Sean Stevens, FIREs    chief research adviser. Here at FIRE,    weve long observed that many people who say theyre concerned    about free speech waver when it comes to beliefs they    personally find offensive. But the best way to protect your    speech in the future is to defend the right to controversial    and offensive speech today.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mr. Stevens said the Philadelphia advocacy group could not    explain what drove respondents to favor censoring offensive    views. He noted its the first time FIRE    and Dartmouth have administered the survey.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other key findings:  <\/p>\n<p>     Asked whether people are able to freely express their    views, 69% said free speech in America is heading in the wrong    direction, compared to 31% who believe it is on the right    track.  <\/p>\n<p>     Just 25% of adults described the right to free speech today    as either very or completely secure, compared to 29% who    said it is not at all secure.  <\/p>\n<p>     Nearly half of Democrats and 26% of Republicans described    free speech as heading in the right direction. More than a    third of Republicans said free speech is already secure,    compared to 17% of Democrats.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, respondents expressed greater hesitation about    suppressing written expression and livelihood.  <\/p>\n<p>    The survey found that 59% of respondents opposed removing    public library books containing the idea they found most    offensive. Another 72% said employers should not fire people    who express such beliefs from their jobs.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to researchers who conducted the survey, partisan    animosity toward free speech threatens the stability of the    U.S. political system.  <\/p>\n<p>    Polarization not only divides Americans on policy, but it    fractures our assessments of the stability of the bedrock    features of our democracy, said Sean Westwood, the director of    Dartmouths Polarization Research Lab.  <\/p>\n<p>    Dartmouths lab and FIRE    conducted the poll online Jan. 12-19, surveying 1,000 members    of a YouGov panel. The margin of error was plus or minus 3    percentage points.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2024\/feb\/28\/one-third-of-adults-say-first-amendment-goes-too-f\" title=\"One-third of adults say the First Amendment 'goes too far' - Washington Times\" rel=\"noopener\">One-third of adults say the First Amendment 'goes too far' - Washington Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Americans have a constitutional right to express themselves freely, but a newpoll finds that many want to limit that freedom to those who offend them. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and Dartmouth Colleges Polarization Research Lab reported Tuesday that 31% of adults surveyed said the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees. Nearly a third of Republicans and a third of Democrats said they completely or mostly agreed with the statement <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/one-third-of-adults-say-the-first-amendment-goes-too-far-washington-times\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94877],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1122649","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1122649"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1122649"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1122649\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1122649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1122649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1122649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}