{"id":1121318,"date":"2024-01-23T17:44:26","date_gmt":"2024-01-23T22:44:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/by-protecting-election-workers-democrats-mean-protecting-control-over-election-administration-the-federalist\/"},"modified":"2024-01-23T17:44:26","modified_gmt":"2024-01-23T22:44:26","slug":"by-protecting-election-workers-democrats-mean-protecting-control-over-election-administration-the-federalist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/federalist\/by-protecting-election-workers-democrats-mean-protecting-control-over-election-administration-the-federalist\/","title":{"rendered":"By &#8216;Protecting Election Workers,&#8217; Democrats Mean Protecting Control Over Election Administration &#8211; The Federalist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    When regime-approved journalists arent pretending election illegalities dont    exist, theyre fomenting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories    about Republican voters.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the months leading up to and    following the 2022 midterms, legacy media have run story after    story decrying    the avalanche of alleged threats levied against election    workers by GOP voters, whom they cast as extremists seeking to    disrupt democracy. Predictions of such widespread    interference in the 2022 contests have (unsurprisingly)    never    materialized and numbers from President Bidens own Justice    Department have undermined such a    narrative. But nevertheless, the scaremongering from the    Democracy Dies in Darkness crowd persists.  <\/p>\n<p>    This seemingly coordinated effort has prompted Democrats in    state legislatures throughout the country to base legislation    on such election falsehoods. In Virginia, for example, a    Democrat state senator filed a bill this month    that would classify    threatening an individual because of his roles as a current or    former election official as a hate crime. The bill could also    result in a net increase in periods of imprisonment for    Virginians charged with crimes related to threatening election    officials.  <\/p>\n<p>    Threatening election workers is already explicitly prohibited    under both Virginia and    federal law. SB    364 is currently awaiting action from the Senate Courts of    Justice Committee.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite Democrats insistence, evidence does not support the    notion that election workers everywhere are facing constant    threats from conservatives.  <\/p>\n<p>    During hisAugust 2022    testimonybefore the U.S. Senate, Kenneth A. Polite    Jr., the assistant attorney general for the criminal division    of the DOJ, claimed the agencys Election Threats Task Force     which waslaunchedin    July 2021 to address this alleged rise in threats against    election workers  had reviewed and assessed roughly 1,000    allegedly threatening and harassing communications directed    toward election officials. But two days before Polites    testimony, the DOJ issued apress    releasedisclosing that only about 11 percent of those    1,000 communications met the threshold for a federal criminal    investigation and that the remaining reported contacts did    not provide a predication for further investigation. According    to an agency press    release a year later, the Justice Departments Election    Threats Task Force had charged 14 cases involving threats    against the election community and secured nine convictions as    of Aug. 31, 2023.  <\/p>\n<p>    Got that? In a country with a population of more    than335 million people, only    about 100 individuals were investigated by the DOJ for    supposedly threatening election workers, and only 14 of them    were officially charged.  <\/p>\n<p>    Virginia isnt the only state where Democrats are pushing    legislation based upon the medias phony election workers are    under siege! narrative. Leftist legislators in Florida, Missouri, and    Washington    introduced bills in recent weeks    seeking to increase penalties for those convicted of    threatening election officials.  <\/p>\n<p>    Even worse, some elected Republicans have lent credence to this    baseless talking point by prioritizing Democrat proposals. GOP    legislators in New Jersey and Nebraska joined    their respective Democrat colleagues in cosponsoring    legislation cracking down on threats towards election workers    this year. In South Dakota, Secretary of State Monae Johnson, a    Republican, is spearheading a bill that would deem Any person    who, directly or indirectly, utters or addresses any threat or    intimidation to an election official or election worker with    the intent to improperly influence an election  guilty of a    Class 1 misdemeanor.  <\/p>\n<p>    The measure unanimously passed the Senate State Affairs    Committee (8-0) on Wednesday, even after Deputy Secretary of    State Tom Deadrick told senators    that South Dakota hasnt yet experienced threats against poll    workers.  <\/p>\n<p>    Meanwhile, GOP governors such as Joe Lombardo of    Nevada and Kevin Stitt of    Oklahoma signed respective bills last year into law that    similarly increased penalties for threatening election    officials. The Oklahoma bill was sponsored by three    Republicans.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other states that have passed laws inspired by Democrats    election lies include California,    Colorado, Maine, New Mexico,    Oregon, and    Vermont.  <\/p>\n<p>    Much like Democrats war against basic election security    measures like voter ID, their lying about widespread threats    against election officials is a strategy aimed at bringing less     not more  integrity to U.S. elections.  <\/p>\n<p>    Their strategy of using anecdotal incidents to cast a broader    narrative about Republicans isnt just crafted to scare away    independents and moderate voters from the GOP. Its also    designed to dissuade conservatives from partaking in legitimate    forms of election oversight, such as poll watching.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ahead of the 2022 midterms, for example, the Republican    National Committee recruitedmore than    70,000new poll watchers and workers ahead of Election    Day to help deliver the election transparency that voters    deserve. And of course, Democrats went berserk,parrotingthe same threat to    democracy talking point.  <\/p>\n<p>    Federal law already prohibits individuals from threatening and    harassing election workers. Performative proposals to enhance    state charges against such crimes are less about protecting    people and more about furthering Democrats unsubstantiated    talking points and scaring away conservatives engaged in the    elections process.  <\/p>\n<p>    Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a    graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He previously    served as a state content writer for Convention of States    Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets,    including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative    Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the rest here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/01\/22\/by-protecting-election-workers-democrats-mean-protecting-control-over-election-administration\/\" title=\"By 'Protecting Election Workers,' Democrats Mean Protecting Control Over Election Administration - The Federalist\">By 'Protecting Election Workers,' Democrats Mean Protecting Control Over Election Administration - The Federalist<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> When regime-approved journalists arent pretending election illegalities dont exist, theyre fomenting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about Republican voters.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/federalist\/by-protecting-election-workers-democrats-mean-protecting-control-over-election-administration-the-federalist\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487839],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1121318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-federalist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1121318"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1121318"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1121318\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1121318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1121318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1121318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}