{"id":1120979,"date":"2024-01-12T14:09:18","date_gmt":"2024-01-12T19:09:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/fl-lawmakers-back-in-tallahassee-to-debate-limits-on-abortion-free-speech-public-news-service\/"},"modified":"2024-01-12T14:09:18","modified_gmt":"2024-01-12T19:09:18","slug":"fl-lawmakers-back-in-tallahassee-to-debate-limits-on-abortion-free-speech-public-news-service","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/fl-lawmakers-back-in-tallahassee-to-debate-limits-on-abortion-free-speech-public-news-service\/","title":{"rendered":"FL lawmakers back in Tallahassee to debate limits on abortion, free speech &#8211; Public News Service"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Within hours of the start of Florida's legislative session,      newly filed bills are set to test the limits on hot-button      topics such as abortion and free speech.    <\/p>\n<p>      Florida's new 15-week abortion ban has yet to be implemented      due to litigation, but state Rep. David Borrero,      R-Sweetwater, has filed H.B. 1519, which would prohibit any person or      entity from purposely performing or attempting to perform an      abortion.    <\/p>\n<p>      Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, took to social media to      express her outrage, calling the move \"cruel for the sake of      being cruel.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      \"It is a total abortion ban that eliminates what were already      narrow exceptions for rape or incest and also goes further      into criminalizing individuals or entities that provide      medication abortion by mail, \" she implored.    <\/p>\n<p>      The news comes as a state constitutional amendment that would      protect abortion access in Florida received enough signatures      of support to appear on ballots in the November election.      However, a challenge by the state's attorney general could      still block it, claiming the language is misleading.    <\/p>\n<p>      Another newly filed measure, S.B. 1780, by Sen. Jason Brodeur, R-Lake Mary,      would make it easier for an individual to sue another person      for defamation.    <\/p>\n<p>      Eskamani sees the measure as an attempt to create a penalty      for an opinion one doesn't like, which she believes is a      slippery slope that could lead to criminalization.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"As long as you're not directly threatening me, there really      is not a path forward that I can pursue,\" Eskamani explained,      \"and I'm OK with that because I should not be punishing      people for expressing a viewpoint I don't like. I don't have      to agree with it.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      For a successful defamation case, one has to prove \"actual      malice.\" A defendant found liable for defamation could be      fined at least $35,000. The bill also removes bedrock      journalistic privileges, particularly the right to keep      sources anonymous. Statements from anonymous sources would be      considered \"presumptively false,\" making journalists      reporting on discrimination vulnerable to lawsuits.    <\/p>\n<p>      Tuesday is the final day for lawmakers to file bills, and the      legislative session wraps up in early March.    <\/p>\n<p>      get more stories      like this via email    <\/p>\n<p>      January is Cervical Health Awareness Month and      health experts said they are concerned about the growing      number of cervical cancer diagnoses nationwide.    <\/p>\n<p>      Kentucky already has the highest rate of cervical cancer in      the U.S., with the state's Appalachian region having cases at      twice the national rate.    <\/p>\n<p>      Rebecca Gibron, CEO of Planned Parenthood in Kentucky, said      cervical cancer takes years to develop, and can be prevented      easily with regular screenings for early detection and with      the HPV vaccine. Middle-aged patients who missed early      detection are at highest risk.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"Older women are more vulnerable,\" Gibran explained. \"I think      the reason is this age group in particular may not have      received the recommended number of screening tests with      normal results before they stopped having Pap smears.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      Studies have shown women ages 40-44 who live in the south are      less likely to be vaccinated against HPV or screened for      cervical cancer, and also comprise the demographic who did      not have access to the vaccine during adolescence. The      American Cancer Society estimated in 2023, more than 4,000 women died from cervical      cancer nationwide.    <\/p>\n<p>      Infection with HPV is the single greatest risk factor for      cervical cancer. It is estimated more than 90% of cervical      cancer cases are caused by HPV each year. Gibron encouraged      Kentuckians to prioritize their reproductive health in the      new year. She added regional Planned Parenthood Health      Centers offer PAP exams and more.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"We often are the only provider of affordable reproductive      health care or the only provider that offers specialized      care,\" Gibron pointed out. \"We want folks to take control of      their health care and get their annual wellness visit, get      their HPV test, young people get your HPV vaccine.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends the      HPV vaccine for children ages 11 and 12, but adults up to age 45 can also receive their shot.      Condom use has been shown to help lower the chances of      spreading HPV.    <\/p>\n<p>      get more stories      like this via email    <\/p>\n<p>      As the United States Supreme Court decides whether the abortion pill is      safe, some legal scholars predict the decision may      backfire on anti-abortion advocates.    <\/p>\n<p>      The case paving the way for the nation's highest court to get      involved does not focus on abortion access, but rather the      U.S. Food and Drug Administration's process to approve drugs.    <\/p>\n<p>      The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled last      summer that mifepristone can stay on shelves where it is      legal. However, the appeals court decided FDA changes making      easier access to the drug failed to follow proper procedure.    <\/p>\n<p>      Indiana University Law Professor Jody Madeira isn't surprised      the high court picked up the case and predicts it might not      have the result anti-abortion proponents expect.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"And I do think that it might end up, in a surprising way,      protecting abortion rights,\" Madeira said. \"The Supreme Court      has been sort of on a trend where it's been narrowing agency      rights. But here, the right the FDA has is to judge whether      mifepristone is safe.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      Madeira posed this question: If courts start deciding drug      safety, then what becomes the incentive for pharmaceutical      companies to develop new drugs and treatments?    <\/p>\n<p>      A final decision on mifepristone use is expected by the end      of June.    <\/p>\n<p>      Another obstacle women and girls face is finding doctors      comfortable with the ambiguity of new laws restricting      abortion. In many cases, according to Madeira, patients      cannot find care because doctors don't want to risk losing      their medical license.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"State authorities will go to great lengths to persecute and      prosecute doctors who even speak to the media about      performing and abortion,\" Madeira stressed. \"Dr. Caitlin Bernard and our attorney general,      Todd Rokita, is the perfect example. Certainly, doctors      have a right to feel very wary and reluctant.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      Drug companies and the FDA say mifepristone is safe and has      lower risks than such common drugs as Tylenol and Viagra.    <\/p>\n<p>      get more stories      like this via email    <\/p>\n<p>      A federal judge has temporarily blocked an anti-abortion law      in Idaho restricting people's ability to travel to other      states for the procedure.    <\/p>\n<p>      During the 2023 legislative session, state lawmakers passed a      law restricting \"abortion trafficking,\" which it describes      as an adult bringing a child across state lines for an      abortion with the intent to conceal it from the child's      parents or guardians.    <\/p>\n<p>      Kelly O'Neill, staff attorney for the nonprofit Legal      Voice, said a U.S. district court judge agreed to their      preliminary injunction request, blocking      the law while the case is decided.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"The judge agreed that the law is unconstitutional and that      it violates First Amendment freedoms, the right to interstate      travel, and that it's unconstitutionally vague and that it's      confusing,\" O'Neill outlined. \"A person can't determine what      conduct is legal and what might land you in prison for a      minimum of two years.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      Idaho has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the      country, with the procedure banned in nearly every instance.      While abortions have decreased in the state, research shows      they've increased in neighboring states where it is protected      since Roe v. Wade was overturned, such as in Washington.    <\/p>\n<p>      O'Neill noted Idaho is not the only state where lawmakers are      attempting to restrict abortion.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"There's a huge wave of anti-abortion laws coming out of      Idaho in particular and every state in the nation,\" O'Neill      pointed out. \"People are working and doing their part to try      to push back against those and restore options of choices and      freedom, and this is certainly a way that we're helping to do      that.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      The suit challenging the Idaho law was filed in July. The      parties involved gave oral arguments in September.    <\/p>\n<p>      get more stories      like this via email    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continue reading here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.publicnewsservice.org\/2024-01-09\/reproductive-health\/fl-lawmakers-back-in-tallahassee-to-debate-limits-on-abortion-free-speech\/a88146-1\" title=\"FL lawmakers back in Tallahassee to debate limits on abortion, free speech - Public News Service\" rel=\"noopener\">FL lawmakers back in Tallahassee to debate limits on abortion, free speech - Public News Service<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Within hours of the start of Florida's legislative session, newly filed bills are set to test the limits on hot-button topics such as abortion and free speech. Florida's new 15-week abortion ban has yet to be implemented due to litigation, but state Rep. David Borrero, R-Sweetwater, has filed H.B <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/free-speech\/fl-lawmakers-back-in-tallahassee-to-debate-limits-on-abortion-free-speech-public-news-service\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[162384],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1120979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1120979"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1120979"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1120979\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1120979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1120979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1120979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}