{"id":1120110,"date":"2023-12-19T01:34:26","date_gmt":"2023-12-19T06:34:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/experts-who-discredited-biden-laptop-call-to-extend-warrantless-spying-the-federalist\/"},"modified":"2023-12-19T01:34:26","modified_gmt":"2023-12-19T06:34:26","slug":"experts-who-discredited-biden-laptop-call-to-extend-warrantless-spying-the-federalist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/federalist\/experts-who-discredited-biden-laptop-call-to-extend-warrantless-spying-the-federalist\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Experts&#8217; Who Discredited Biden Laptop Call To Extend Warrantless Spying &#8211; The Federalist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The same intelligence experts who penned the infamous Hunter    Biden laptopletter in October    2020 are now calling on lawmakers to reauthorize the    warrantless surveillance state through the National Defense    Authorization Act (NDAA).  <\/p>\n<p>    On Monday, 46 former national security officials signed a    letter urging Capitol Hill to rubber stamp the reauthorization    of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act    (FISA). The same law was abused by deep-state FBI agents to    surveil members of Trumps campaign. The more than three dozen    former national security officials who signed the letter    invoked the fentanyl crisis and overseas turmoil to make their    case for unconstitutional surveillance.  <\/p>\n<p>    As you well know, our nation is under significant threat today    with wars in Europe and the Middle East, a potential conflict    with China in the Indo-Pacific, and the deadly flow of fentanyl    across our southern border, they wrote. In these    circumstances, we cannot hamstring the U.S. Intelligence    Community either by failing to renew Section 702 of the Foreign    Intelligence Surveillance Act or by limiting it in ways that    would make it difficult for the government to protect    Americans.  <\/p>\n<p>    Four of the letters signatories also signed the letter in the    fall of 2020 that sought to discredit Hunter Bidens laptop as    an instrument of Russian interference. Former Director of    National Intelligence James Clapper, former Deputy Director for    the National Security Agency (NSA) Richard Ledgett, former    Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Acting Director Michael    Morell, and former CIA Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash each put    their names on both the humiliating 2020 laptop letter and    Mondays call to reauthorize baseless surveillance.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are preparing to reauthorize Section    702 of FISA, which expires on Dec. 31, without significant    reform through the NDAA, an annual defense bill. Section 702    ostensibly allows    federal intelligence officials to monitor non-U.S. persons,    located abroad, who are expected to possess, receive, or    communicate foreign intelligence information. FISA has been        abused,    however, to conduct domestic surveillance of the regimes    political opponents.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now the same former federal intelligence officials who propped    up President Joe Biden in 2020 by peddling a Russian conspiracy    theory have demanded that Congress keep the levers of their    insurance    policy for 2024 intact.  <\/p>\n<p>    Theres no substitute for it, they wrote Monday.  <\/p>\n<p>    In an interview with New York Magazine, Clapper defended signing    the discredited Biden laptop letter last fall. The letters    allegations of Russian interference were quickly debunked with    rare on-the-record statements from the FBI, the    Department of Justice, theDepartment of    National Intelligence, and theState Department,    all before Election Day.  <\/p>\n<p>    Clapper was not pleased to be asked about the letter two years    after its release, the magazine reported.  <\/p>\n<p>    What are you trying to get me to say, that I screwed up and I    shouldnt have signed the letter? Im not going to say that,    Clapper told the paper. As far as I was concerned, we were    waving the yellow flag. At the time, it was fishy to me. It had    the characteristics of a Russian disinformation campaign.  <\/p>\n<p>    Morell, the former acting CIA director who signed both    letters, was a campaign surrogate for President Biden in the    2020 election and admitted he drafted and circulated the    letter to give Joe Biden a talking point to use during a 2020    presidential debate against then-President Donald Trump.  <\/p>\n<p>    [READ: CIA Solicited    Signatures For Hunter Biden Laptop Letter, Congressional    Testimony Shows]  <\/p>\n<p>    On Monday last week, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan sent a    letter to former    CIA Director William Burns demanding to know who, if any, of    the 51 former intelligence officials who signed the Biden    laptop letter were paid by the agency.  <\/p>\n<p>    We understand that former intelligence officials often return    to the intelligence community under private contract for their    previous agencies, Jordan wrote. It is vital to the    Committees oversight to understand whether any of the    signatories of the public statement were actively employed by    CIA as contractors or consultants at the time they signed the    public statement.  <\/p>\n<p>    Last week, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, blasted the congressional    effort to pass a proposed FISA reform measure as a thinly    veiled way of saying FISA 702 is just fine as it is.'  <\/p>\n<p>    The FBI has used Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence    Surveillance Act to conduct warrantless backdoor searches of    the private electronic communications of American citizens,    Lee wrote in a Blaze    op-ed on Monday. It has done so, moreover, not just    sporadically and by accident but quite deliberately and on    hundreds of thousands of occasions.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Brennan Center for Justice agrees, calling the    proposed measure by House Republicans the biggest expansion in    government surveillance since the Patriot Act. The liberal    think tank faults provisions that would expand corporate    compliance with government surveillance programs without    adequate safeguards to prevent abuse.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite its name, the FISA Reform and Reauthorization Act is    not a reform bill. It is an anti-reform bill in disguise,    reads a Brennan Center policy paper. Not only does it fail to    rein in warrantless surveillance of Americans of Section 702;    it would actually expand surveillance in    critical respects, effectively rewarding the FBI for years of    misconduct and thus encouraging even more flagrant abuse in the    future.  <\/p>\n<p>    [READ: Think The FBI    Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? This Laundry List Of    Corruption Should Make You Think Again]  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Original post:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/12\/12\/intel-experts-who-falsely-discredited-hunter-biden-laptop-call-to-extend-warrantless-spying-on-americans\/\" title=\"'Experts' Who Discredited Biden Laptop Call To Extend Warrantless Spying - The Federalist\">'Experts' Who Discredited Biden Laptop Call To Extend Warrantless Spying - The Federalist<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The same intelligence experts who penned the infamous Hunter Biden laptopletter in October 2020 are now calling on lawmakers to reauthorize the warrantless surveillance state through the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). On Monday, 46 former national security officials signed a letter urging Capitol Hill to rubber stamp the reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/federalist\/experts-who-discredited-biden-laptop-call-to-extend-warrantless-spying-the-federalist\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487839],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1120110","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-federalist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1120110"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1120110"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1120110\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1120110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1120110"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1120110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}