{"id":1119575,"date":"2023-11-28T12:39:41","date_gmt":"2023-11-28T17:39:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/sam-altmans-second-coming-sparks-new-fears-of-the-ai-apocalypse-wired\/"},"modified":"2023-11-28T12:39:41","modified_gmt":"2023-11-28T17:39:41","slug":"sam-altmans-second-coming-sparks-new-fears-of-the-ai-apocalypse-wired","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/transhuman\/sam-altmans-second-coming-sparks-new-fears-of-the-ai-apocalypse-wired\/","title":{"rendered":"Sam Altman&#8217;s Second Coming Sparks New Fears of the AI Apocalypse &#8211; WIRED"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Open AIs new boss is the same as the old boss. But the    companyand the artificial intelligence industrymay have been    profoundly changed by the past five days of high-stakes soap    opera. Sam Altman, OpenAIs CEO, cofounder, and figurehead, was    removed by the board of directors on Friday. By Tuesday night,    after     a mass protest by     the majority of the startups staff, Altman was on his    way back, and most of the existing board was gone. But        that board, mostly independent of OpenAIs operations,    bound to a for the good of humanity mission statement, was    critical to the companys uniqueness.  <\/p>\n<p>    As Altman toured    the world in 2023, warning the media and governments about    the existential dangers of the technology that he himself was    building, he portrayed OpenAIs     unusual for-profit-within-a-nonprofit structure as a    firebreak against the irresponsible development of powerful AI.    Whatever Altman did with Microsofts billions, the board could    keep him and other company leaders in check. If he started    acting dangerously or against the interests of humanity, in the    boards view, the group could eject him. The board can fire    me, I think thats important, Altman told Bloomberg in June.  <\/p>\n<p>    It turns out that they couldnt fire him, and that was bad,    says Toby Ord, senior research fellow in philosophy at Oxford    University, and a prominent voice among people who warn AI    could pose an existential risk to humanity.  <\/p>\n<p>    The chaotic leadership reset at OpenAI ended    with the board being reshuffled to consist of establishment    figures in tech and former US secretary of the treasury Larry    Summers. Two directors associated with the effective altruism    movement, the only women, were removed from the board. It has    crystallized existing divides over how the future of AI should    be governed. The outcome is seen very differently by doomers    who worry that AI is going to destroy humanity; transhumanists    who think the tech will hasten a utopian future; those who    believe in freewheeling market capitalism; and advocates of    tight regulation to contain tech giants that cannot be trusted    to balance the potential harms of powerfully disruptive    technology with a desire to make money.  <\/p>\n<p>    To some extent, this was a collision course that had been set    for a long time, says Ord, who is also credited with    cofounding the effective altruism movement, parts of which have    become obsessed with the doomier end of the AI risk spectrum.    If its the case that the nonprofit governance board of OpenAI    was fundamentally powerless to actually affect its behavior,    then I think that exposing that it was powerless was probably a    good thing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Governance Gap  <\/p>\n<p>    The reason that OpenAIs board decided to move against Altman        remains a mystery. Its announcement that Altman was out of    the CEO seat said he was not consistently candid in his    communications with the board, hindering its ability to    exercise its responsibilities. An internal OpenAI memo later    clarified that Altmans ejection was not made in response to    malfeasance. Emmett    Shear, the     second of two interim CEOs to run the company between    Friday night and Wednesday morning, wrote after accepting the    role that hed asked why Altman was removed. The board did not    remove Sam over any specific disagreement on safety, he wrote.    Their reasoning was completely different from that. He    pledged to launch an investigation into the reasons for    Altmans dismissal.  <\/p>\n<p>    The vacuum has left space for rumors, including that Altman was    devoting too much time to side projects or was too deferential    to Microsoft. It has also nurtured conspiracy theories, like    the idea that OpenAI had created artificial    general intelligence (AGI), and the board had flipped the    kill switch on the advice of chief scientist, cofounder, and    board member Ilya Sutskever.  <\/p>\n<p>    What I know with certainty is we don't have AGI, says David    Shrier, professor of practice, AI, and innovation, at Imperial    College Business School in London. I know with certainty there    was a colossal failure of governance.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Follow this link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/sam-altman-second-coming-sparks-new-fears-ai-apocalypse\/\" title=\"Sam Altman's Second Coming Sparks New Fears of the AI Apocalypse - WIRED\" rel=\"noopener\">Sam Altman's Second Coming Sparks New Fears of the AI Apocalypse - WIRED<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Open AIs new boss is the same as the old boss. But the companyand the artificial intelligence industrymay have been profoundly changed by the past five days of high-stakes soap opera. Sam Altman, OpenAIs CEO, cofounder, and figurehead, was removed by the board of directors on Friday <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/transhuman\/sam-altmans-second-coming-sparks-new-fears-of-the-ai-apocalypse-wired\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1119575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-transhuman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119575"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1119575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1119575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1119575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1119575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}