{"id":1119179,"date":"2023-11-08T21:18:23","date_gmt":"2023-11-09T02:18:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/background-to-the-energy-act-2023-rema-revolution-not-evolution-watson-farley-williams\/"},"modified":"2023-11-08T21:18:23","modified_gmt":"2023-11-09T02:18:23","slug":"background-to-the-energy-act-2023-rema-revolution-not-evolution-watson-farley-williams","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/background-to-the-energy-act-2023-rema-revolution-not-evolution-watson-farley-williams\/","title":{"rendered":"Background to the Energy Act 2023: REMA  Revolution, not evolution &#8211; Watson Farley &amp; Williams"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Twelve area electricity boards were responsible for the    distribution and supply of electricity to consumers. At    privatisation, fourteen public electricity suppliers were    created to take on these roles. They were further spun out by    the Utilities Act 2000 into what we know as the todays    distribution network operators and electricity suppliers.  <\/p>\n<p>    In Scotland, two companies were responsible for generation,    transmission and distribution. These were the South of Scotland    Electricity Board, the pre-cursor to what is now Scottish    Power, and the North of Scotland Hydro-Electric Board, the    pre-cursor to what is now SSE.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Climate Change Act was enacted in 2008. At that time, the    UKs generation mix was dominated by large, centralised power    plants. According to a briefing by Carbon Brief, in    2008 just 56 power stations burning coal, gas, oil or    nuclear fuel account for the lions share of power    capacity, with approximately 80% of UK electricity coming    from fossil fuels and another 13% from nuclear.  <\/p>\n<p>    These large-scale generating stations were historically    situated further away from population centres, mainly    connecting to the high voltage transmission network. The number    of connection requests was much lower than it is today, and    investment in transmission and distribution networks was mainly    limited to operations and maintenance.  <\/p>\n<p>    The transmission connection process today still reflects these    arrangements, with connecting users expected to bear the whole    cost of their own connections and of any reinforcements    triggered on the wider network. Cancellation charges are    designed to compensate the transmission owners for sunk costs    if generation projects were cancelled, as it was expected that    any assets would be stranded.  <\/p>\n<p>    The picture today is vastly different. We currently have c.80    GW of generation connected to the transmission network, with a    queue of projects waiting for connection totalling between 230    GW and 340 GW, depending on which sources one relies on. If a    generation project is cancelled, there is a whole queue of    projects eagerly waiting to push ahead and use the vacated    capacity. While some design costs might be wasted, it is highly    improbable that assets would be stranded.  <\/p>\n<p>    These numbers do not include lower voltage distribution    connections. A Cornwall Insight report citing Embedded    Capacity Registers published by DNOs shows that we currently    have c.21 GW of renewable generation connected to the    distribution networks, and a further 70 GW waiting for    connection.  <\/p>\n<p>    Unfortunately, neither the transmission owners nor the DNOs    have ramped up resources to cope with this demand. While they    must bear some of the responsibility for that, it is fair to    also recognise the part played by an out-dated framework (both    in the legislation and the industry codes) that makes change    cumbersome and slow.  <\/p>\n<p>    The changes contemplated by REMA are welcome, though much    delayed. These delays make meeting our net zero goals by 2050    challenging, though we hope that the urgency of the required    changes will maintain momentum and help revolutionise our power    system to the benefit of all participants.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Energy Act 2023, granted royal assent on 26 October 2023,    creates the powers required to take forward some of these    changes, though the further design and deployment of these    powers will no doubt require further public consultation in due    course.  <\/p>\n<p>    Having set the scene, we (along with the rest of the    electricity industry) are eagerly awaiting further details    expected to be set out in consultations due later this year.  <\/p>\n<p>    If you would like to discuss any of the issues raised by    REMA, please get in touch with the author or your usual WFW    contact.  <\/p>\n<p>    [1] Electricity Networks    Commissioner  Companion Report Findings and    Recommendations, June 2023    [2] Letter of support to facilitate the processing of the TEC    Amnesty, Ofgem, 15 August 2023    [3] Waiting to connect: the problems    and solutions for network connection queues, Cornwall    Insight, 25 January 2023  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.wfw.com\/articles\/background-to-the-energy-act-2023-rema-revolution-not-evolution\/\" title=\"Background to the Energy Act 2023: REMA  Revolution, not evolution - Watson Farley &amp; Williams\">Background to the Energy Act 2023: REMA  Revolution, not evolution - Watson Farley &amp; Williams<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Twelve area electricity boards were responsible for the distribution and supply of electricity to consumers. At privatisation, fourteen public electricity suppliers were created to take on these roles. They were further spun out by the Utilities Act 2000 into what we know as the todays distribution network operators and electricity suppliers <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/background-to-the-energy-act-2023-rema-revolution-not-evolution-watson-farley-williams\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187748],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1119179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119179"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1119179"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119179\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1119179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1119179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1119179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}