{"id":1118990,"date":"2023-10-29T07:48:15","date_gmt":"2023-10-29T11:48:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/talk-show-host-patricia-bryan-sues-police-and-government-loop-loop-news-cayman\/"},"modified":"2023-10-29T07:48:15","modified_gmt":"2023-10-29T11:48:15","slug":"talk-show-host-patricia-bryan-sues-police-and-government-loop-loop-news-cayman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/private-islands\/talk-show-host-patricia-bryan-sues-police-and-government-loop-loop-news-cayman\/","title":{"rendered":"Talk Show Host Patricia Bryan Sues Police and Government | Loop &#8230; &#8211; Loop News Cayman"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    According to a 134-page document filed in the    Summary Court on October 25, 2023, Patricia Bryan, host of the    new talk show \"Legal Talk With Patricia    Bryan,\"is suing Laveta Dunn, the Royal    Cayman Islands Police Service (RCIPS), the Cayman Islands    Government and a local recruitment company for damages. The    Plaint alleges \"discrimination\" against Miss Bryan as a    Caymanian and suggests that she suffered a loss of earnings. In    addition, the Plaint alleges that certain conduct caused her    \"anxiety, intimidation, emotional distress.\"      <\/p>\n<p>    The details of the allegation, according to    the Plaint, are that Miss Bryan \"was recruited on April 3,    2023, by CML Recruitment for a six (6)    months-temporary-to-potential-for-permanent) contact with the    Royal Cayman Islands Police Services Business Office to start    on April 5, 2023.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The Plaint added:  <\/p>\n<p>      That though Plaintiff was hired as a      Paralegal, Plaintiff acted more in the capacity of Legal      Adviser.    <\/p>\n<p>      That the Manager Defendant Dunn consulted with the      Plaintiff plus staff was directed to consult with the      Plaintiff on interpretation and application of relevant Acts      pursuant to services offered through the Department.    <\/p>\n<p>      That Plaintiff's duties included reviewing certain Acts      and recommending changes, interpreting and applying relevant      Acts to services offered, revising and updating application      forms for services, reviewing Police Clearances and Police      Records before releasing to the public, drafting      communication\/correspondence, reviewing and drafting      operating policies in conjunction with Defendant Dunn, and      other relevant duties as assigned.    <\/p>\n<p>    In carrying out Miss Bryan's duties, the    Plaint alleges that \"Defendant Lavetta Dunn, in her capacity as    Manager of the Royal Cayman Islands Police Services (RCIPS)    Business Office, created a toxic and oftentimes hostile work    environment, engaged in offensive and abusive behavior; often    failed to assert and conduct herself in a professional and    respectful manner; often displayed poor leadership, engaged in    periods of workplace bullying by way of and including speaking,    to Plaintiff with disdain, and in condescending, belittling    tones\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The Plaint also alleges that Defendant Dunn    subjected her \"to conversations of discrimination, malicious    gossip, slander, and defamation from inception of employment    and for most of duration of employment, of past management,    past and present staff both within and outside presence of    present staff.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    These conversations allegedly extended to    \"discrimination\" against Miss Bryan as a    Caymanian.  <\/p>\n<p>    Regarding this, the Plaint claims that    Defendant Dunn \"made statements such as \"Well Patricia you can    go tell your Caymanian people that we don't take cash in this    office.\" This was allegedly said to Miss Bryan where \"there    were at least seven (7) or eight (8) other Caymanians on staff    and who were present in the staff    meeting.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The Plaint added:  <\/p>\n<p>      The actions and conduct of Defendant Dunn      were acts of which she acted unconscionably and carelessly,      her acts caused anxiety, intimidation, emotional distress,      disruptive to progress of Plaintiff's ability to      professionally and to capably perform      duties.    <\/p>\n<p>      Due to this Plaintiff began to experience extreme      anxiety, began to dread or be apprehensive of interacting      with Defendant Dunn.    <\/p>\n<p>      That due to the conduct of the Defendant      Dunn Plaintiff consulted the advice of Senior Public Servants      and RCIPS Officials, then eventually mental health      services.    <\/p>\n<p>    Regarding the RCIPS as a body, the Plaint    alleges that the \"RCIPS failed to immediately provide a work    environment contrary to complaints from Plaintiff and failed to    have Defendant Dunn refrain from and cease workplace toxicity    including harassment, discrimination and bullying behavior\"    towards Miss Bryan.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Plaint alleged further \"That then-Chief    Officer\/Police Commissioner denied\" her \"a copy of the Report    from Cayman HR, a privately recruited Human Resources company    retained by RCIPS to investigate\" her    complaint.  <\/p>\n<p>    Regarding this, the Plaint said Miss Bryan's    request for a copy of the Report was rejected \"on the grounds    that the report was commissioned and paid for by the RCIPS, and    that the subject of complaint had to give permission to release    the report,\" even though Miss Bryan was the    complainant.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Plaint alleged    further:  <\/p>\n<p>      That then Chief Officer\/Commissioner of      Police in September during a meeting with himself and other      senior officials advised Plaintiff that had she not resigned,      she could be transferred to another      position.    <\/p>\n<p>      Thus, Plaintiff interpreted to mean rather than address      and deal with Defendant Dunn's conduct Plaintiff would      instead have to be uprooted from her position to start anew      elsewhere.    <\/p>\n<p>      This Plaintiff is aware has been done      before plus cause others to request transfers or      resign.    <\/p>\n<p>      Facts are that two other staff members were transferred      and resigned approximately the same time as Plaintiff.    <\/p>\n<p>    The Plaint continued: \"By way of these    actions, RCIPS failed to remedy the workplace bullying,    harassment and discrimination plus live up to its own policies    against workplace bullying, thereby allowing a continuous cycle    of toxic workplace environment.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Turning to the Government, the Plaint alleged    as follows:  <\/p>\n<p>      As an oversight did not provide direct      legislations either and through the Labour Act or the Civil      Service policies and procedures which address private      employees hired by Employment Recruiters for positions within      the Public Sector or Civil Service, and address employees      subject to workplace toxicity.    <\/p>\n<p>      That due to the lack of legislation caused      there to be no Act within the jurisdiction which addresses      employment issues which happens to an employee who is      considered a private employee hired to a Public\/Civil Service      position and that because of this unconventional style of      employment, the Public\/Civic Service will not address a      private employee, yet the present Labour Acts neither can      address matters which takes place on a Public Service      position, thereby leaving a gray area within the Cayman      Islands Labour and associating Acts. This lack of legislation      has left the Plaintiff in a state of limbo and dire      straits on who and how to address employment issues of a      private employee placed in a public employment and who      experienced workplace toxicity, bullying, harassment and      discrimination.    <\/p>\n<p>    The Plaint concluded:  <\/p>\n<p>      Due to the grounds set out above, in that      the Cayman Islands Government including the RCIPS, breached      contractual obligations and expectations by way of direct      association with recruitment companies, violates the Cayman      Islands Civil Service orders, and breaches the Cayman Islands      Constitutional Rights of the Plaintiff.    <\/p>\n<p>      Because of the acts or lack thereof and      failures of all Defendants, the Plaintiff submit all      Defendants effected a Breach of Contract, either directly or      indirectly by association and relationship of all Defendants,      and which caused the Plaintiff to be left with no other      recourse except to resign to preserve Plaintiff's emotional      and psychological state of mind, professional and personal      morale, and humility.    <\/p>\n<p>    Concerning the foregoing, the Plaint noted that Miss    Bryan is seeking $20,000 in damages.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to see the original: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/cayman.loopnews.com\/content\/talk-show-host-patricia-bryan-sues-police-and-government\" title=\"Talk Show Host Patricia Bryan Sues Police and Government | Loop ... - Loop News Cayman\">Talk Show Host Patricia Bryan Sues Police and Government | Loop ... - Loop News Cayman<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> According to a 134-page document filed in the Summary Court on October 25, 2023, Patricia Bryan, host of the new talk show \"Legal Talk With Patricia Bryan,\"is suing Laveta Dunn, the Royal Cayman Islands Police Service (RCIPS), the Cayman Islands Government and a local recruitment company for damages. The Plaint alleges \"discrimination\" against Miss Bryan as a Caymanian and suggests that she suffered a loss of earnings. In addition, the Plaint alleges that certain conduct caused her \"anxiety, intimidation, emotional distress.\" The details of the allegation, according to the Plaint, are that Miss Bryan \"was recruited on April 3, 2023, by CML Recruitment for a six (6) months-temporary-to-potential-for-permanent) contact with the Royal Cayman Islands Police Services Business Office to start on April 5, 2023.\" The Plaint added: That though Plaintiff was hired as a Paralegal, Plaintiff acted more in the capacity of Legal Adviser <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/private-islands\/talk-show-host-patricia-bryan-sues-police-and-government-loop-loop-news-cayman\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187811],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1118990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-private-islands"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1118990"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1118990"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1118990\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1118990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1118990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1118990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}