{"id":1118843,"date":"2023-10-25T16:25:19","date_gmt":"2023-10-25T20:25:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/north-macedonia-curbed-roma-citizens-freedom-of-movement-balkan-insight\/"},"modified":"2023-10-25T16:25:19","modified_gmt":"2023-10-25T20:25:19","slug":"north-macedonia-curbed-roma-citizens-freedom-of-movement-balkan-insight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/north-macedonia-curbed-roma-citizens-freedom-of-movement-balkan-insight\/","title":{"rendered":"North Macedonia Curbed Roma Citizens&#8217; Freedom of Movement &#8230; &#8211; Balkan Insight"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The European Court of Human Rights, ECHR found in a judgment    published on Tuesday that four citizens of North Macedonia of    Roma origin were discriminated against in 2014 when border    authorities prevented them from leaving their own country.  <\/p>\n<p>    The first incident had happened on November 29, 2014 at Skopje    airport when the first plaintiff, named as Ms. Memedova, was    prevented from departing to Germany, where she said she was    going to visit her son.  <\/p>\n<p>    The second plaintiff, named as Ms. Kurtishova, was prevented    from flying from the same airport on June 19 the same year. The    other three plaintiffs, a married couple named as Abazov and    Abazova and their driver, named as Memedovski, were rebuffed at    the Tabanovce border crossing with Serbia on March 4, 2014.  <\/p>\n<p>    The ECHR found that the first four plaintiffs had been    discriminated against and that their rights to freedom of    movement and freedom to choose ones own residence within a    states territory, as well as freedom to leave any country,    including ones own, had been violated.  <\/p>\n<p>    It also found that North Macedonia violated the European    Convention on Human Rights provision prohibiting    discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour,    language, religion, political or other opinion, national or    social origin, association with a national minority, property,    birth or other status.  <\/p>\n<p>    The court however found that the case brought by the fifth    plaintiff, the driver of the married couple, was inadmissible.  <\/p>\n<p>        The judgment, which was reached on October 3 has been    already appealed by the government of North Macedonia.  <\/p>\n<p>    Strasbourg ordered the country to pay for plaintiffs costs and    expenses plus compensation of 3,000 euros and 4,100 euros to    the first and second plaintiffs respectively, for suffering    non-pecuniary damage  such as distress and frustration,    stemming from the actions of the state authorities.  <\/p>\n<p>    An additional joint sum of 5,900 euros is to be paid to the    third and fourth applicants, the married couple.  <\/p>\n<p>    The easing of the visa regime for travelling into the Schengen    Zone for most of the Western Balkan countries in 2009 resulted    in a surge of asylum requests by people from the region to the    more developed European countries.  <\/p>\n<p>    Many people coming from impoverished regions in the Balkans    used the novelty to travel and ask for asylum in countries with    long asylum procedures like Germany, Belgium and Sweden. Even    if eventually turned down and ordered to return, during their    prolonged stay they would receive state benefits far surpassing    what they would earn or receive in welfare payments in their    home countries.  <\/p>\n<p>    The situation caused these countries to     increase the pressure on the Balkan states to do more to    prevent these people from reaching their borders, and also    to introduce or consider introducing protective mechanisms to    suspend visa-free travel.  <\/p>\n<p>    North Macedonia started boosted checks on departing passengers    at its borders in 2011 after a memo from the Interior Ministry    that ordered the strengthening of the controls during exit    from the territory of Republic of Macedonia of organised    groups, potential asylum seekers, citing article 15 of the    Border Control Law as a legal basis.  <\/p>\n<p>    But human rights groups and later the State Ombudsmans office,    as well as the Constitutional Court, determined that this    article contained no basis for border services to prevent their    own citizens from exiting the country, except if they were    found to be a threat to national security, public policies,    international relations or public health.  <\/p>\n<p>    In June 2014, the then Interior Ministry spokesperson, Marija    Jakovlevska, told BIRN that during 2012 and 2013, the border    authorities prevented the exit of 15,590 citizens.  <\/p>\n<p>    Subsequent unofficial data and research by human rights groups    in the country has suggested that the countrys impoverished    and marginalised Roma population was the most common target for    border turnbacks.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/balkaninsight.com\/2023\/10\/24\/north-macedonia-curbed-roma-citizens-freedom-of-movement-court\" title=\"North Macedonia Curbed Roma Citizens' Freedom of Movement ... - Balkan Insight\">North Macedonia Curbed Roma Citizens' Freedom of Movement ... - Balkan Insight<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The European Court of Human Rights, ECHR found in a judgment published on Tuesday that four citizens of North Macedonia of Roma origin were discriminated against in 2014 when border authorities prevented them from leaving their own country.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/freedom\/north-macedonia-curbed-roma-citizens-freedom-of-movement-balkan-insight\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187727],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1118843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1118843"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1118843"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1118843\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1118843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1118843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1118843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}