{"id":1118414,"date":"2023-10-09T00:26:21","date_gmt":"2023-10-09T04:26:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/oregon-libraries-celebrate-banned-books-week-street-roots-news\/"},"modified":"2023-10-09T00:26:21","modified_gmt":"2023-10-09T04:26:21","slug":"oregon-libraries-celebrate-banned-books-week-street-roots-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/oregon-libraries-celebrate-banned-books-week-street-roots-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Oregon libraries celebrate Banned Books Week &#8211; Street Roots News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Libraries across Multnomah County celebrate Banned Books Week    by prominently displaying banned or challenged books Oct. 1-7.  <\/p>\n<p>    Multnomah County libraries Banned Books Week    celebrations have added significance this year. With book bans    and challenges rising throughout the United States and Oregon,    challenges or requests for reconsideration keep the Oregon    Library Association, or OLA, Intellectual Freedom Committee    busy addressing censorship issues.  <\/p>\n<p>    Librarians throughout Multnomah County and the state look    forward to raising awareness about intellectual freedom in the    wake of schools and librarians facing threats and harassment    regarding books with LGBTQIA+ content.  <\/p>\n<p>    Displays include books like Gender Queer: A Memoir by    Maia Kobabe, the most challenged book in America from 2022,    according to the American Library Association. Many educators    consider this young adult graphic novel, which deals with    gender identity, to be appropriate for high school    students.  <\/p>\n<p>    The State Library of Oregon reports book challenges are    at a historic high, with many attempts focused on multiple    titles at once. Of 46 challenges, 82% were at public libraries    and 18% at school libraries. Patrons, parents or groups, some    explicitly political or religious, file the challenges. These    challenges range from requesting librarians move a book to a    separate library shelf to asking librarians to remove materials    altogether.  <\/p>\n<p>    The First Amendment allows individuals to gather, speak,    publish, read and view what they wish with few restrictions.    The legal bar for restricting speech is extremely high, so    banning books in public libraries is on shaky ground when it    comes to the First Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Regardless of dubious legality, groups and individuals    are ramping up efforts to ban books, particularly those written    by marginalized people, Shawn Cunningham, Multnomah County    Library spokesperson, said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Across the country, so-called parent advocacy groups put    pressure on school districts to ban books addressing race,    sexuality and gender identity. Leading groups include Citizens    Defending Freedom, Parents Rights in Education and Moms for    Liberty, which are typically funded by special interest groups    and promote a far-right or religious agenda. Often, the groups    have few local ties, if any, but work to create a superficial    fervor for banning books in a given area.  <\/p>\n<p>    Multnomah County Library stands against censorship,    Cunningham said. Public libraries are vital civic spaces,    places for differing ideas and points of view. Promoting civil    discourse about difficult subjects and upholding the principles    of intellectual freedom are core library values.  <\/p>\n<p>    In light of organized efforts to suppress marginalized    voices and perspectives, those values are more important than    ever.  <\/p>\n<p>    Emily ONeal, OLA Intellectual Freedom Committee chair,    leads OLAs efforts around intellectual freedom.  <\/p>\n<p>    ONeal said the committee has been busier than usual in    recent years. Four years ago, the committee tracked one    challenged book at a time. Now, the committee typically tracks    three or four book challenges at a time.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bans, challenges, censorship; a lot of folks use the    term banning universally, but it is the least likely of    scenarios, ONeal, also a public librarian in Bend, said. A    ban is the result of a process when a book has been removed. It    does not happen very often and is not a concern nationwide. We    more often see a challenge process, the act of asking for    removal.  <\/p>\n<p>    Request for Reconsideration is a formal process to    challenge a book. Questions on the form from the OLA include    whether someone read the entire book, what concerns they have    and suggestions for how they want the library to provide more    information and other viewpoints. The complainant completes the    form and talks to the librarian, teacher or principal about    their concerns.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to Miranda Doyle, a school library media    specialist who serves on the OLA Intellectual Freedom    Committee, the process can continue from there. If unresolved,    the school district can form a committee that meets once or    several times; they vote on their recommendation. Most often,    there are teachers, parents, students and librarians on the    committee. These meetings can be public or summarized for the    public afterward. Sometimes, the recommendation to retain,    remove or relocate books goes to the school board or    superintendent for approval or a different outcome.  <\/p>\n<p>    Multnomah County Library operates based on a set of    values and goals that reflect its mission of service to the    community, Cunningham said. Library patrons are welcome to    submit statements of concern about library materials; the    library evaluates each of those separately and with    care.  <\/p>\n<p>    Currently, 90 books, two films and one magazine are on    the State Library of Oregons list of challenged items. Almost    all have been retained or are under review. One, Crank by    Ellen Hopkins, has been restricted. Libraries are still    reviewing some items and have not removed any.  <\/p>\n<p>    Most challengers follow the process, but sometimes people    circumvent this by going straight to the library board, school    administration or local government, according to the state    library. A few resort to aggressive tactics, such as harassing    library staff and lobbing death threats, as was the case for    three Oregon public libraries challenged over LGBTQIA+ books    this year.  <\/p>\n<p>    The state library reports challengers accused the    libraries of promoting content, distributing pornography to    minors, and encouraging sexualization of young children. In    addition to death threats and general harassment, challengers    called library staff groomers and \"pedophiles,\" according to    the state librarys Oregon Intellectual Freedom Clearinghouse    2023 Report.  <\/p>\n<p>    These instances in Oregon reflect what is happening    around the country. OLAs Intellectual Freedom Committee    maintains a statement regarding its stance on the First    Amendment and book banning.  <\/p>\n<p>    We support the right of parents and guardians to guide    their childs reading and viewing choices, but that right does    not extend to removing choices for others, the statement    reads. The work of libraries and librarians is to serve    everyone in their community and provide resources that are    reflective of the world around us.  <\/p>\n<p>    All the books on the American Library Associations list    of the 13 most challenged books of 2022 face claims of sexually    explicit content or content pertaining to LGBTQIA+ communities.    A 2022 Gallup poll found 7.1% of the U.S. population identifies    as LGBTQIA+, double the number in 2012. These books reflect a    growing demand, and the pushback reflects an intensifying    reaction from people and groups with anti-LGBTQIA+    views.  <\/p>\n<p>    The American Library Association Office of Intellectual    Freedom documented challenges to 3,923 book titles nationwide    between Jan. 1 and Aug. 31. Challenges are up from last year    and the highest number of challenges in the last 20 years. Most    of these books were written by or about people of color or    members of LGBTQIA+ communities. Some depict violence or    abuse.  <\/p>\n<p>    While libraries removing books altogether is rare, its    not unheard of in Oregon.  <\/p>\n<p>    In April 2022, North Medford High School removed the    graphic novel version of Margaret Atwoods book, The    Handmaids Tale, from shelves. A parent complained about    images of nudity, sexual assault and suicide in the dystopian    science fiction novel, and the school has not returned the    title, according to ONeal.  <\/p>\n<p>    In March 2023, KGW News reported the Canby School    District removed 36 titles outside of the review process. Two    community members wanted to remove the books because they    allegedly depict violence, sexual content, profanity and drug    addiction.  <\/p>\n<p>    KGWs published list of challenged titles included mostly    books by and about people of color, LGBTQIA+ people and books    with alleged sexual content.  <\/p>\n<p>    The district planned to review the books over the summer,    according to ONeal. Hundreds of parents and students wanted    the books returned to the shelves. They attended board    meetings, protested and the students set up an Instagram    account.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ultimately, a school board-established committee decided    to keep all books except one, Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov.    ONeal said the school board did not involve the OLA in the    process.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other school districts in Oregon have faced similar    requests from parents, but chose to keep the books available    until the matter was resolved. Some, like West Linn-Wilsonville    School District, chose to restrict certain books to high school    libraries.  <\/p>\n<p>    PEN America, a writing advocacy group, reports most book    bans this school year are in Texas, Florida, Missouri, Utah and    South Carolina.  <\/p>\n<p>    At least seven states passed or are considering obscenity    laws penalizing librarians for providing LGBTQIA+ content or    what the state considers sexually explicit content, according    to The Washington Post.  <\/p>\n<p>    One thing that is important to this current situation is    the folks that are pushing for materials to be removed are    organized and pushing at a higher level, ONeal said. They    are political and organized, with extreme views, not what    communities want. I dont want a protected worldview, and Im    baffled as to who these people are because it is an organized    extreme effort.  <\/p>\n<p>    In December 2022, The Bulletin reported some parents    asked a director of library services in Crook County to remove    childrens books with LGBTQIA+ content to a different part of    the library. Moving and labeling the books would be a violation    of the First Amendment and could put funding for the library in    jeopardy, according to an attorney hired by Crook    County.  <\/p>\n<p>    In turn, the Crook County Library Board of Trustees voted    not to move or label the books reflecting the LGBTQIA+    community. Following this, students were not given access to    school library materials.  <\/p>\n<p>    Social media posts targeted the director with    misinformation, and patrons subjected library staff to    harassment and name-calling. The director eventually resigned,    partly due to the overwhelming pressure, The Bulletin    reported.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Oregon Library Association helps libraries through    challenges across the state as a resource with policies and    information. It may issue public statements against the    challenges.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are things a library can and should do, ONeal    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    She recommends well-trained library staff work with    library boards and their community to make sure they understand    what to do about book challenges. They can be sure to follow    the process and not sidestep policies. Community members can    speak up at board meetings in support of libraries and First    Amendment rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    In states with less official resistance to book banning,    libraries fight back against First Amendment violations with    lawsuits.  <\/p>\n<p>    This year, libraries in Arkansas, Texas, Florida,    Missouri and Wisconsin filed lawsuits because of First    Amendment violations, with the help of the Freedom to Read    Foundation, the First Amendment legal defense branch of the    American Library Association.  <\/p>\n<p>    In June, the Freedom to Read Foundation, along with    authors, librarians, readers, publishers and booksellers, filed    suit for Arkansas to remove Act 372, which restricts reading    materials in libraries and bookstores.  <\/p>\n<p>    In Texas, citizens filed a suit against the Llano County    government for removing materials from the county library that    some library users complained about.  <\/p>\n<p>    PEN America and Penguin Random House sued the Florida    Department of Education on May 16 over unconstitutional book    bans targeting books about LGBTQIA+ identities along with race    and racism. The ACLU has been involved in other lawsuits,    fighting against censorship and upholding the    Constitution.  <\/p>\n<p>    Banned Books Week is a time to call out the need to fight    against censorship and to celebrate the freedom to read. This    year, the ALAs theme for Banned Books Week is Let Freedom    Read!.  <\/p>\n<p>    Young people in Multnomah County weighed in on the topic    of banning or challenging books. The library published some of    their comments.  <\/p>\n<p>    Ive read many banned books, a youth from Gresham said.    For example, Stamped by Jason Reynolds & Ibram X. Kendi. I    believe people challenged it because of its content on racism.    And the history they wrote about it. I found it very    interesting and a very important novel. We learn about history    so we make sure it doesnt happen again.  <\/p>\n<p>    Multnomah County Library states on its website that    everyone should have the opportunity to see themselves    represented on the shelves.  <\/p>\n<p>    I think books are being banned\/challenged because people    are afraid of what they dont understand, so they try to get    rid of it altogether, a young reader from Woodstock Library    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Street Roots is an award-winningweekly investigative    publication covering economic, environmental and social    inequity. The newspaperis sold in Portland, Oregon, by    people experiencing homelessness and\/or extreme poverty as    means of earning an income with dignity.Street Roots    newspaper operates independently of Street Roots advocacy    andis a part of the Street Roots    organization.Learn more about Street    Roots.Support your community    newspaperbymaking a one-time or recurring    gift today.  <\/p>\n<p>     2023Street Roots. All rights reserved.    |To request permission to reuse content,    <a href=\"mailto:emaileditor@streetroots.orgor\">emaileditor@streetroots.orgor<\/a>    call503-228-5657, ext. 404  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.streetroots.org\/news\/2023\/10\/04\/banned-books-week-oregon-libraries\" title=\"Oregon libraries celebrate Banned Books Week - Street Roots News\" rel=\"noopener\">Oregon libraries celebrate Banned Books Week - Street Roots News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Libraries across Multnomah County celebrate Banned Books Week by prominently displaying banned or challenged books Oct. 1-7 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/oregon-libraries-celebrate-banned-books-week-street-roots-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94877],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1118414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1118414"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1118414"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1118414\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1118414"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1118414"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1118414"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}