Paul Krugmans latest unhinged column in The New York Times wreaks of bad faith. <\/p>\n
On Tuesday, the papers economic columnist from the City University of New York Graduate Center wrote a nearly 900-word piece outlining a false binary when it comes to aid for Ukraine. Republicans who oppose another multi-billion-dollar aid package to the war-torn country, he wrote, just want Putin to win. <\/p>\n
They view the Putin regimes cruelty and repression as admirable features that America should emulate, Krugman told the subscribers of The New York Times. They support a wannabe dictator at home and are sympathetic to actual dictators abroad. <\/p>\n
Opponents of the generous aid packages might also be trying to avoid American involvement in another overseas war, but for Krugman, that would be giving his political rivals too much credit. <\/p>\n
Krugman penned the column after conservative Republicans successfully ripped out another round of funding for Ukraine in the latest budget showdown last week. The compromise bill to keep the government open for another 45 days passed both chambers Saturday with bipartisan support. Absent from the measure was another $6 billion for Ukraine demanded by both Democrats and Senate Republican leadership. Lawmakers have until Nov. 17 to come to another agreement before a government shutdown. <\/p>\n
Krugman criticized the conservative effort to eliminate more Ukraine aid, arguing the amount of tax dollars sent to Eastern Europe is a small budget item. <\/p>\n
Total federal outlays are currently running at more than $6 trillion a year, or more than $9 trillion every 18 months, so Ukraine aid accounts for less than 1 percent of federal spending (and less than 0.3 percent of G.D.P.), Krugman wrote, as if $6 trillion was nothing to sneeze at. With a national debt of more than $33 trillion and rising, it might be time to question whether spending $9 trillion every 18 months is really sustainable. Instead, his focus is on whether taxpayer spending is a good deal for Ukraine. <\/p>\n
The Biden administration committed more than $113 billion in aid to Ukraine last year, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. How much more money does Ukraine need? A blank check, apparently. <\/p>\n
[READ: While You Pinch Inflated Pennies, Congress Sent $900 Of Your Household Income To Ukraine] <\/p>\n
Pay no attention to all those complaints about how much were spending in Ukraine, Krugman wrote. They arent justified by the actual cost of aid, and the people claiming to be worried about the cost dont really care about the money. What they are, basically, is enemies of democracy, both abroad and at home. <\/p>\n
In other words, anything less than unchecked funding for the war effort, according to Krugmans view, is antithetical to democracy. But is Ukraine even a democracy? In March, Federalist Senior Editor David Harsanyi outlined how it isnt. <\/p>\n
Ukraine which, before the war, regularlyslotted insomewhere beneath Burma, Mexico, and Hungary on those silly democracy matrixes left-wingers used to love isnt any kind of liberal democracy, Harsanyi wrote. Today Ukraine stillshutterschurches andrestrictsthe free press. Maybe you believe those are justifiable actions during wartime, but under no definition are they liberal. Ukraine has never been a functioning democracy.' <\/p>\n
Supporters of unlimited funding, meanwhile, are touchy when it comes to substantive aid oversight. In December, then-Democrat House Armed Services Chair Adam Smith said claims over lack of oversight makes me a little crazy. <\/p>\n
Number one, the focus on that is part of Russian propaganda. All these stories about how the money isnt being spent wisely, Smith said at the Reagan National Defense Forum. Second, Ukraine is spending the money really well Thats why theyre winning. <\/p>\n
The fact that Ukraine hasnt lost the war, apparently, is all the evidence the Washington lawmaker needs. <\/p>\n
In August, Democrats went on to block an effort to implement greater oversight of Ukraine funding. A leaked memo from the Biden administration published this week by Politico raised more concerns about where the tax dollars indeed went. <\/p>\n
Biden administration officials are far more worried about corruption in Ukraine than they publicly admit, a confidential U.S. strategy document obtained by POLITICO suggests, the paper reported. The administration wants to press Ukraine to cut graft, not least because U.S. dollars are at stake. But being too loud about the issue could embolden opponents of U.S. aid to Ukraine, many of them Republican lawmakers who are trying to block such assistance. <\/p>\n
Put simply, dont talk about the transparency of taxpayer aid. Its bad politics. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
View original post here: <\/p>\n
Krugman Smears Anyone Opposed To Ukraine Aid As Pro-Putin - The Federalist<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Paul Krugmans latest unhinged column in The New York Times wreaks of bad faith. On Tuesday, the papers economic columnist from the City University of New York Graduate Center wrote a nearly 900-word piece outlining a false binary when it comes to aid for Ukraine Continue reading