{"id":1117886,"date":"2023-09-19T00:25:53","date_gmt":"2023-09-19T04:25:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/downclimbing-the-hidden-evolutionary-force-behind-human-scitechdaily\/"},"modified":"2023-09-19T00:25:53","modified_gmt":"2023-09-19T04:25:53","slug":"downclimbing-the-hidden-evolutionary-force-behind-human-scitechdaily","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/downclimbing-the-hidden-evolutionary-force-behind-human-scitechdaily\/","title":{"rendered":"Downclimbing  The Hidden Evolutionary Force Behind Human &#8230; &#8211; SciTechDaily"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Dartmouth researchers propose that the ability of humans to      freely move their shoulders and elbows, aiding in activities      like reaching or throwing, originated as a natural braking      system for primate ancestors descending from trees. Through      an analysis of climbing techniques and limb structures in      chimps and mangabeys, they found that the unique limb      flexibility in apes and early humans allowed them to descend      safely, a trait that eventually facilitated evolutionary      advancements in tool use and hunting techniques.    <\/p>\n<p>    The mobility in human shoulders and the flexibility of our    elbows, which enable actions like reaching high shelves or    throwing a ball, may have originally developed as a safety    mechanism for our primate ancestors descending from trees.  <\/p>\n<p>    A study by Dartmouth    researchers, published in the journal Royal Society Open    Science, suggests that apes and early humans likely    developed these mobile joints to regulate their speed when    descending from trees due to the pull of gravity on their    weightier frames. As early humans transitioned from forests to    savannas, these adaptable limbs proved crucial for tasks such    as food collection and the use of tools for hunting and    protection.  <\/p>\n<p>    The researchers used sports-analysis and statistical software    to compare videos and still-frames they took of chimpanzees and    small monkeys called mangabeys climbing in the wild. They found    that chimps and mangabeys scaled trees similarly, with    shoulders and elbows mostly bent close to the body. When    climbing down, however, chimpanzees extended their arms above    their heads to hold onto branches like a person going down a    ladder as their greater weight pulled them downward rump-first.  <\/p>\n<p>    Luke Fannin, first author of the    study and a graduate student in Dartmouths Ecology, Evolution,    Environment, and Society program, said the findings are among    the first to identify the significance of downclimbing in the    evolution of apes and early humans, which are more genetically    related to each other than to monkeys. Existing research has    observed chimps ascending and navigating treesusually in    experimental setupsbut the researchers extensive video from    the wild allowed them to examine how the animals bodies    adapted to climbing down, Fannin said.  <\/p>\n<p>      Dartmouth researchers report that apes and early humans      evolved more flexible shoulders and elbows than monkeys      (above) to safely get out of trees. For early humans, these      versatile appendages would have been essential for gathering      food and deploying tools for hunting and defense. Credit:      Luke Fannin, Dartmouth    <\/p>\n<p>    Our study broaches the idea of downclimbing as an undervalued,    yet incredibly important factor in the diverging anatomical    differences between monkeys and apes that would eventually    manifest in humans, Fannin said. Downclimbing represented    such a significant physical challenge given the size of apes    and early humans that their morphology would have responded    through natural selection because of the risk of falls.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our field has thought about apes climbing up trees for a long    timewhat was essentially absent from the literature was any    focus on them getting out of a tree. Weve been ignoring the    second half of this behavior, said study co-authorJeremy    DeSilva, professor and chair ofanthropologyat    Dartmouth.  <\/p>\n<p>    The first apes evolved 20 million years ago in the kind of    dispersed forests where they would go up a tree to get their    food, then come back down to move on to the next tree, DeSilva    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Getting out of a tree presents all kinds of new challenges.    Big apes cant afford to fall because it could kill or badly    injure them. Natural selection would have favored those    anatomies that allowed them to descend safely.  <\/p>\n<p>    Flexible shoulders and elbows passed on from ancestral apes    would have allowed early humans such    asAustralopithecusto climb trees at night    for safety and come down in the daylight unscathed, DeSilva    said. OnceHomo erectuscould use fire to    protect itself from nocturnal predators, the human form took on    broader shoulders capable of a 90-degree angle thatcombined    with free-moving shoulders and elbowsmade our ancestors    excellent shots with a spear (apes cannot throw accurately).  <\/p>\n<p>    Its that same early-ape anatomy with a couple of tweaks. Now    you have something that can throw a spear or rocks to protect    itself from being eaten or to kill things to eat for itself.    Thats what evolution doesits a great tinkerer, DeSilva    said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Climbing down out of a tree set the anatomical stage for    something that evolved millions of years later, he said. When    an NFL quarterback throws a football, that movement is all    thanks to our ape ancestors.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite chimps lack of grace, Fannin said, their arms have    adapted to ensure the animals reach the ground safelyand their    limbs are remarkably similar to those of modern humans.  <\/p>\n<p>    Its the template that we came fromgoing down was probably    far more of a challenge for our early ancestors, too, Fannin    said. Even once humans became upright, the ability to ascend,    then descend, a tree wouldve been incredibly useful for safety    and nourishment, which is the name of the game when it comes to    survival.Were modified, but the    hallmarks of our ape ancestry remain in our modern skeletons.  <\/p>\n<p>      The researchers used sports-analysis software to compare the      climbing movements of chimpanzees and mangabeys (pictured).      They found that chimps support their greater weight when      climbing down by fully extending their arms above their heads      thanks to shallow, rounded shoulder joints and shortened      elbow bones that are similar to those in humans. Mangabeys,      which are built more like cats or dogs, have less flexibility      and position their shoulders and elbows roughly the same when      climbing up or down. Credit: Luke Fannin, Dartmouth    <\/p>\n<p>    The researchers also studied the anatomical structure of chimp    and mangabey arms using skeletal collections at Harvard    University and The Ohio State University, respectively. Like    people, chimps have a shallow ball-and-socket shoulder    thatwhile more easily dislocatedallows for a greater range of    movement, Fannin said. And like humans, chimps can fully extend    their arms thanks to the reduced length of the bone just behind    the elbow known as the olecranon process.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mangabeys and other monkeys are built more like quadrupedal    animals such as cats and dogs, with deep pear-shaped shoulder    sockets and elbows with a protruding olecranon process that    makes the joint resemble the letter L. While these joints are    more stable, they have a much more limited flexibility and    range of movement.  <\/p>\n<p>    The researchers analysis showed that the angle of a chimps    shoulders was 14 degrees greater during descent than when    climbing up. And their arm extended outward at the elbow 34    degrees more when coming down from a tree than going up. The    angles at which mangabeys positioned their shoulders and elbows    were only marginally different4 degrees or lesswhen they were    ascending a tree versus downclimbing.  <\/p>\n<p>    If cats could talk, they wouldtell you that climbing    down is trickier than climbing up and many human rock climbers    wouldagree. But the question is why is it so hard, said    study co-authorNathaniel Dominy, the Charles Hansen    Professor of Anthropology and Fannins adviser.  <\/p>\n<p>    The reason is that youre not only resisting the pull of    gravity, but you also have to decelerate, Dominy said. Our    study is important for tackling a theoretical problem with    formal measurements of how wild primatesclimb up and    down. We found important differences between monkeys and    chimpanzees that may explain why the shoulders and elbows of    apes evolved greater flexibility.  <\/p>\n<p>    Co-author Mary Joy, who led the study with Fannin for her    undergraduate thesis and graduated from Dartmouth in 2021, was    reviewing videos of chimps that DeSilva had filmed when she    noticed the difference in how the animals descended trees than    how they went up them.  <\/p>\n<p>    It was very erratic, just crashing down, everythings flying.    Its very much a controlled fall, Joy said. In the end, we    concluded that the way chimps descend a tree is likely related    to weight. Greater momentum potentially expends less energy and    theyre much more likely to reach the ground safely than by    making small, restricted movements.  <\/p>\n<p>    But as a trail runner, Joy knew the pained feeling of inching    down an incline in short clips instead of just hurtling down    the path with the pull of gravity, her legs extended forward to    catch her at the end of each stride.  <\/p>\n<p>    When Im moving downhill, the slower Im    going and restricting my movement, the more Im fatiguing. It    catches up to me very quickly. No one would think the speed and    abandon with which chimps climb down from trees would be the    preferred method for a heavier primate, but my experience tells    me its more energy efficient, she said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Movement in humans is a masterpiece of evolutionary    compromises, Joy said. This increased range of motion that    began in apes ended up being pretty good for us. What would the    advantage of losing that be? If evolution selected for people    with less range of motion, what advantages would that confer? I    cant see any advantage to losing that.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reference: Downclimbing and the evolution of ape forelimb    morphologies by Luke D. Fannin, Mary S. Joy, Nathaniel J.    Dominy, W. Scott McGraw and Jeremy M. DeSilva, 6 September    2023, Royal Society Open Science.    DOI:    10.1098\/rsos.230145  <\/p>\n<p>    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, the    Clare Garber Goodman Fund and the James O. Freedman    Presidential Scholars Research Fund at Dartmouth, a Mamont    Scholars Grant from The Explorers Club, the Leakey Foundation,    and the Primate Society of Great Britain.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Original post:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/scitechdaily.com\/downclimbing-the-hidden-evolutionary-force-behind-human-anatomy\/\" title=\"Downclimbing  The Hidden Evolutionary Force Behind Human ... - SciTechDaily\">Downclimbing  The Hidden Evolutionary Force Behind Human ... - SciTechDaily<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Dartmouth researchers propose that the ability of humans to freely move their shoulders and elbows, aiding in activities like reaching or throwing, originated as a natural braking system for primate ancestors descending from trees. Through an analysis of climbing techniques and limb structures in chimps and mangabeys, they found that the unique limb flexibility in apes and early humans allowed them to descend safely, a trait that eventually facilitated evolutionary advancements in tool use and hunting techniques. The mobility in human shoulders and the flexibility of our elbows, which enable actions like reaching high shelves or throwing a ball, may have originally developed as a safety mechanism for our primate ancestors descending from trees <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/evolution\/downclimbing-the-hidden-evolutionary-force-behind-human-scitechdaily\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[187748],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1117886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117886"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1117886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117886\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1117886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1117886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1117886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}