{"id":1117806,"date":"2023-09-17T11:45:16","date_gmt":"2023-09-17T15:45:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/the-brave-new-world-of-synthetic-humans-gne-taylor-iai\/"},"modified":"2023-09-17T11:45:16","modified_gmt":"2023-09-17T15:45:16","slug":"the-brave-new-world-of-synthetic-humans-gne-taylor-iai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-engineering\/the-brave-new-world-of-synthetic-humans-gne-taylor-iai\/","title":{"rendered":"The Brave New World of synthetic humans | Gne Taylor &#8211; IAI"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Last week, Israeli scientists announced that they had    created a model human embryo without using sperm or eggs; are    we heading for a future where procreation is an entirely    technological, not biological, phenomenon? Genetics and    reproduction specialist Dr Gne Taylor explains what this    means for the future of human reproduction.  <\/p>\n<p>    Brave New World-like dystopia, transhumanist pipedream,    or feminist paradise? Dr Gne Taylor will    be hosting a panel with Anders Sandberg, Mary    Harrington and Kristen Godhsee to debate the future of the    artificial womb at HowTheLightGetsIn Festival in London,    23rd and 24th September. Check out the    festival programme and incredible line-up of speakers        here.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    It was recently reported that researchers have created    models of human embryos out of stem cells in a lab environment,    without the use of sperm or eggs, grown outside the womb. Can    you explain what exactly this means? Is this a biological    entity that could grow further, and go on to be become a    human?  <\/p>\n<p>    A few years ago, scientists found to their surprise that, when    under the right conditions, mouse stem cells within the lab can    self-organise into structures akin to those seen during early    mouse development. This caused much excitement as people    wondered whether it would be possible to do the same with human    stem cells. This very recent news reported that when scientists    mixed four different types of human stem cells together, they    organise themselves into these structures that look    recognisably like human embryos at an early stage of    development  complete with cells that would form a placenta    etc.  <\/p>\n<p>    At present, these human stem cell-based embryo models develop    at rates slightly different to human embryos and are    inefficient to generate in the lab, indicating that more work    is required to perfect their growing conditions. Even further    work will be required to see if these models do accurately    replicate early human development  it is still very early    days. Ultimately, until they are tested by growing further it    is not possible to say definitively if they could become a    human.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    It sounds like an amazing achievement, but whats the    point in growing artificial embryos from stem cells? What are    the possible benefits?  <\/p>\n<p>    Human embryos spend a critical period of their early    development hidden away inside the lining of the mothers womb,    which makes it hard to study them. Many important biological    events occur within the embryo during this time and there is    also a high incidence of embryo loss. Therefore, understanding    what is happening within human embryos during this period of    early embryonic development will help us better understand    early pregnancy loss and how birth defects occur.  <\/p>\n<p>    Currently, scientists rely upon non-human animal models such as    mice to try and understand these early stages of development.    The hope for this new field of generating embryo models from    stem cells is to allow scientists to grow structures that    resemble human embryos outside of the human body, therefore    allowing them to be studied. As these models use human cells,    it is becoming possible for the first time to start really    understanding what goes on during this black box of our    development.  <\/p>\n<p>         SUGGESTED VIEWING The Contraception Delusion    With Gne    Taylor  <\/p>\n<p>    What are the implications of this development for the    internationally recognized ethical limit (the 14-day rule)    for growing embryos outside of the womb? Do you expect the    ethical guidelines on this to change given this recent    development?  <\/p>\n<p>    The 14-day rule was developed in the 1970s in response to    public concerns regarding in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Through    innovative and extensive public dialogue and consultation, the    Warnock Committee established that human embryos should not be    cultured in a lab beyond 14 days of development. This new and    growing field of stem cell-based embryo models did not exist    when the 14 day rule was established. Therefore, whether or    not the 14-day rule applies to these new models comes down to    your definition of an embryo. An international group of    scientists working within the field have proposed a series of    tipping points for when these human embryo models could    eventually be afforded similar legal and ethical protection as    that of human embryos. Consequently, I do expect that ethical    guidelines on this will change, as will the definition of what    an embryo is.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Fertility technology and genetic engineering technology    such as CRISPR raise numerous ethical questions. Are there new    ethical questions that are raised because of this new    achievement?  <\/p>\n<p>    Of course. New innovations always raise new perspectives and    questions, and I am certain there will be many. For me    personally, one of the most interesting ethical questions that    has immediately sprung to mind is: is it more ethical to use    animal models or generate enough human embryo models to do    meaningful experiments directly in the human context? Of    course, adult disease experiments will still need animal    models, but these stem cell-based embryo models do present a    tantalising opportunity to reduce the number of animals used in    research.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    ___  <\/p>\n<p>    Our clear sense of what it means to be human is being    challenged by these kinds of experiments  just as IVF once    challenged what it means to have a baby.  <\/p>\n<p>    ___  <\/p>\n<p>    How might lab grown embryos redefine what it means to    be human?  <\/p>\n<p>    This is at the heart of the matter. Our clear sense of what it    means to be human is being challenged by these kinds of    experiments  just as IVF once challenged what it means to have    a baby. Only time will tell which facets are the most important    to different cultures and how the diversity of human    perspectives and values will be translated into legal and    ethical frameworks to regulate these embryo models.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    What will the future of human development look like if    reproduction no longer requires a sperm, egg or womb? Are we    heading for utopia, where our current reproductive problems are    all solved, or a dystopia where genetic engineering creates a    new underclass?  <\/p>\n<p>    These new embryo models replicate the very earliest stages of    pregnancy  not the whole 9 months! So while this is a    great opportunity for us to reflect on how we think the tools    we have at our disposal should be used to improve lives in the    future, it remains to be seen if it is even possible to grow a    baby without a womb. Its much too early to be celebrating the    advent of a reproductive utopia, sadly!  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    ___  <\/p>\n<p>    Having knowledge does not mean it must be utilised nor    guarantees it will be used.  <\/p>\n<p>    ___  <\/p>\n<p>    With new technology, like AI and CRISPR, arises the    question of whether scientists should be doing something just    because they can, because they are capable of pushing new    boundaries. Whats your view on this? Should there be no-go    areas or moratoriums when it comes to new technology that can    alter the future in ways we cant predict?  <\/p>\n<p>    Personally, I dont see that not knowing something is    protection from it. I believe that pushing the boundaries of    knowledge and what is possible is the function of science.    Also, that knowledge permits us to assess our options, and the    courses of action we have available in any given moment, to    make the changes we wish to make. However, we all know    intuitively that there is a difference between having knowledge    and using knowledge Having knowledge does not mean it must be    utilised nor guarantees it will be used.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    The recent paper: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-023-06604-5\" rel=\"nofollow\">https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-023-06604-5<\/a>  <\/p>\n<p>    Key review of the policy and governance of embryo    models:     <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0959437X23000837\" rel=\"nofollow\">https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0959437X23000837<\/a>  <\/p>\n<p>    Key statement on the ethical framework of    embryos: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cell.com\/cell\/fulltext\/S0092-8674(23)00807-3\" rel=\"nofollow\">https:\/\/www.cell.com\/cell\/fulltext\/S0092-8674(23)00807-3<\/a>  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/iai.tv\/articles\/the-brave-new-world-of-synthetic-humans-gunes-taylor-auid-2601\" title=\"The Brave New World of synthetic humans | Gne Taylor - IAI\" rel=\"noopener\">The Brave New World of synthetic humans | Gne Taylor - IAI<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Last week, Israeli scientists announced that they had created a model human embryo without using sperm or eggs; are we heading for a future where procreation is an entirely technological, not biological, phenomenon?  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-engineering\/the-brave-new-world-of-synthetic-humans-gne-taylor-iai\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1117806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genetic-engineering"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117806"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1117806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117806\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1117806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1117806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1117806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}