{"id":1117657,"date":"2023-09-07T15:55:21","date_gmt":"2023-09-07T19:55:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/the-new-nypd-settlement-on-protests-will-protect-the-first-amendment-new-york-daily-news\/"},"modified":"2023-09-07T15:55:21","modified_gmt":"2023-09-07T19:55:21","slug":"the-new-nypd-settlement-on-protests-will-protect-the-first-amendment-new-york-daily-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/the-new-nypd-settlement-on-protests-will-protect-the-first-amendment-new-york-daily-news\/","title":{"rendered":"The new NYPD settlement on protests will protect the First Amendment &#8211; New York Daily News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Yesterday, state Attorney General Tish    James, joined by the Legal Aid Society, New    York Civil Liberties Union and private plaintiffs     reached a settlement with the NYPD over its treatment of protected speech    protest activity as a result of its heavy-handed response to    the 2020 racial justice protests following the killing of    George Floyd.  <\/p>\n<p>    The new agreement sensibly sets    out a tiered framework for police response to so-called First    Amendment activity (FAA), including a minimal presence during    peaceful protests and the deployment of additional resources    and units like the troubled Strategic Response Group only if a    newly-appointed FAA executive signs off on it. Under it, the    level of response is intended to be directly proportional to    the level of supposed criminal activity happening around a    protest with the explicit goal of preventing the police from    chilling speech. Good going for James and the other plaintiffs    in safeguarding our speech rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    That the NYPDs protest-response tactics and accountability    practices needed a reevaluation is hardly arguable when just    weeks ago the departments actions     triggered $13 million in settlements to be paid by    taxpayers, but precious few real consequences for the officers    involved. Former Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell refused to    impose the Civilian Complaint Review Boards often mild    recommended discipline in more than half of cases where    officers were even identified, not to mention the dozens where    they werent.  <\/p>\n<p>    Still, a settlement is just words on paper without real    enforcement muscle behind it. The Nuez settlement, which has    for about eight years directed the city to improve dangerous    conditions and pervasive violence on Rikers Island, has clearly    failed to in and of itself compel the sorts of changes that are    necessary, even if it has allowed the continued failures to be    extensively documented by the federal monitor. Remedial orders    and other motions failed to meaningfully move the needle. The    settlement may finally lead to actual improvement if and when    Manhattan Federal Judge Laura Taylor Swain appoints a monitor,    who would have real teeth to implement reforms.  <\/p>\n<p>    The closer parallel of the Handschu settlement, reached more    than three decades ago to curb the NYPDs habit of aggressively    surveilling political movements and organizations that it    disapproved of, clearly did not stop the department from, for    example, unlawfully surveilling Muslim Americans in the    aftermath of 9\/11. These settlements then can best be    understood as tools facilitating the type of active    intervention that is often necessary, and not the intervention    itself.  <\/p>\n<p>    Fortunately, this settlement lays out a pretty robust and    multi-phase oversight system, including a committee formed by    the attorney generals office, the commissioner of the    Department of Investigation, corporation counsel, the forces    new protest chief and representatives from the plaintiffs, who    will examine the NYPDs compliance in phase two. The court will    retain jurisdiction for a year after this phase.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is the most important part of the settlement, and the key    to its success. The NYPD can and might well claim without    backing that a peaceful protest has criminality risk requiring    an elevated response, for example. Both the committee and the    courts must be willing to seek and mandate real consequences    for noncompliance, including aggressive disciplinary action.    Officers and department leaders should understand that    violating the Constitution is not something that will be    tolerated.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Follow this link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/2023\/09\/06\/the-new-nypd-settlement-on-protests-will-protect-the-first-amendment\/\" title=\"The new NYPD settlement on protests will protect the First Amendment - New York Daily News\" rel=\"noopener\">The new NYPD settlement on protests will protect the First Amendment - New York Daily News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Yesterday, state Attorney General Tish James, joined by the Legal Aid Society, New York Civil Liberties Union and private plaintiffs reached a settlement with the NYPD over its treatment of protected speech protest activity as a result of its heavy-handed response to the 2020 racial justice protests following the killing of George Floyd. The new agreement sensibly sets out a tiered framework for police response to so-called First Amendment activity (FAA), including a minimal presence during peaceful protests and the deployment of additional resources and units like the troubled Strategic Response Group only if a newly-appointed FAA executive signs off on it.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/first-amendment-2\/the-new-nypd-settlement-on-protests-will-protect-the-first-amendment-new-york-daily-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94877],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1117657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117657"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1117657"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1117657\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1117657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1117657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1117657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}