{"id":1115222,"date":"2023-06-02T20:18:35","date_gmt":"2023-06-03T00:18:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/physicists-make-matter-out-of-light-to-find-quantum-singularities-scientific-american\/"},"modified":"2023-06-02T20:18:35","modified_gmt":"2023-06-03T00:18:35","slug":"physicists-make-matter-out-of-light-to-find-quantum-singularities-scientific-american","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/quantum-physics\/physicists-make-matter-out-of-light-to-find-quantum-singularities-scientific-american\/","title":{"rendered":"Physicists Make Matter out of Light to Find Quantum Singularities &#8211; Scientific American"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Many seemingly mundane materials,    such as the stainless steel on refrigerators or the quartz in a    countertop, harbor fascinating physics inside them. These    materials are crystals, which in physics means they are made of    highly ordered repeating patterns of regularly spaced atoms    called atomic lattices. How electrons move through a lattice,    hopping from atom to atom, determines many of a solid's    properties, such as its color, transparency, and ability to    conduct heat and electricity. For example, metals are shiny    because they contain lots of free electrons that can absorb    light and then reemit most of it, making their surfaces gleam.  <\/p>\n<p>    In certain crystals the behavior of electrons can create        properties that are much more exotic. The way electrons    move inside graphenea crystal made of carbon atoms arranged in        a hexagonal latticeproduces an extreme version of a    quantum effect called tunneling, whereby particles can plow    through energy barriers that classical physics says should    block them. Graphene also exhibits a phenomenon called the    quantum Hall effect: the amount of electricity it conducts    increases in specific steps whose size depends on two    fundamental constants of the universe. These kinds of    properties make graphene intrinsically interesting as well as    potentially useful in applications ranging from better    electronics and energy storage to improved biomedical devices.  <\/p>\n<p>    I and other physicists would like to understand what's going on    inside graphene on an atomic level, but it's difficult to    observe action at this scale with current technology. Electrons    move too fast for us to capture the details we want to see.    We've found a clever way to get around this limitation,    however, by making matter out of light. In place of the atomic    lattice, we use light waves to create what we call     an optical lattice. Our optical lattice has the exact same    geometry as the atomic lattice. In a recent experiment, for    instance, my team and I made an optical version of graphene    with the same honeycomb lattice structure as the standard    carbon one. In our system, we make cold atoms hop around a    lattice of bright and dim light just as electrons hop around    the carbon atoms in graphene.  <\/p>\n<p>    With cold atoms in an optical lattice, we can magnify the    system and slow down the hopping process enough to actually see    the particles jumping around and make measurements of the    process. Our system is not a perfect emulation of graphene, but    for understanding the phenomena we're interested in, it's just    as good. We can even study lattice physics in ways that are    impossible in solid-state crystals. Our experiments revealed    special properties of our synthetic material that are directly    related to the bizarre physics manifesting in graphene.  <\/p>\n<p>    The crystal phenomena we investigate result from the way    quantum mechanics limits the motion of wavelike particles.    After all, although electrons in a crystal have mass, they are    both particles and waves (the same is true for our ultracold    atoms). In a solid crystal these limits restrict a single    electron on a single atom to only one value of energy for each    possible movement pattern (called a quantum state). All other    amounts of energy are forbidden. Different states have separate    and distinctdiscreteenergy values. But a chunk of solid    crystal the size of a grape typically contains more atoms    (around 1023) than there are grains of sand on    Earth. The interactions between these atoms and electrons cause    the allowed discrete energy values to spread out and smear into    allowed ranges of energy called bands. Visualizing a    material's energy band structure can immediately reveal    something about that material's properties.  <\/p>\n<p>    For instance, a plot of the band structure of silicon crystal,    a common material used to make rooftop solar cells, shows a    forbidden energy rangealso known as a band gapthat is 1.1    electron volts wide. If electrons can jump from states with    energies below this gap to states with energies above the gap,    they can flow through the crystal. Fortunately for humanity,    the band gap of this abundant material overlaps well with the    wavelengths present in sunlight. As silicon crystal absorbs    sunlight, electrons begin to flow through itallowing solar    panels to convert light into usable electricity.  <\/p>\n<p>    The band structure of certain crystals defines a class of    materials known as topological. In mathematics, topology    describes how shapes can be transformed without being    fundamentally altered. Transformation in this context means    to deform a shapeto bend or stretch itwithout creating or    destroying any kind of hole. Topology thus distinguishes    baseballs, sesame bagels and shirt buttons based purely on the    number of holes in each object.  <\/p>\n<p>    Topological materials have topological properties hidden in    their band structure that similarly allow some kind of    transformation while preserving something essential. These    topological properties can lead to measurable effects. For    instance, some topological materials allow electrons to flow    only around their edges and not through their interior. No    matter how you deform the material, the current will still flow    only along its surface.  <\/p>\n<p>    I have become particularly interested in certain kinds of    topological material: those that are two-dimensional. It may    sound odd that 2-D materials exist in our 3-D world. Even a    single sheet of standard printer paper, roughly 0.004 inch    thick, isn't truly 2-Dits thinnest dimension is still nearly    one million atoms thick. Now imagine shaving off most of those    atoms until only a single layer of them remains; this layer is    a 2-D material. In a 2-D crystal, the atoms and electrons are    confined to this plane because moving off it would mean exiting    the material entirely.  <\/p>\n<p>    Graphene is an example of a 2-D topological material. To me,    the most intriguing thing about graphene is that its band    structure contains special spots known as Dirac points. These    are positions where two energy bands take on the same value,    meaning that at these points electrons can easily jump from one    energy band to another. One way to understand Dirac points is    to study a plot of the energy of different bands versus an    electron's momentum a property associated with the particle's    kinetic energy. Such plots show how an electron's energy    changes with its movement, giving us a direct probe into the    physics we're interested in. In these plots, a Dirac point    looks like a place where two energy bands touch; at this point    they're equal, but away from this point the gap between the    bands grows linearly. Graphene's Dirac points and the    associated topology are connected to this material's ability to    display a form of the quantum Hall effect that's unique even    among 2-D materialsthe half-integer quantum Hall effectand    the special kind of tunneling possible within it.  <\/p>\n<p>    To understand what's happening to electrons at Dirac points, we    need to observe them up close. Our optical lattice experiments    are the perfect way to do this. They offer a highly    controllable replica of the material that we can uniquely    manipulate in a laboratory. As substitutes for the electrons,    we use ultracold rubidium atoms chilled to temperatures roughly    10 million times colder than outer space. And to simulate the    graphene lattice, we turn to light.  <\/p>\n<p>    Light is both a particle and a wave, which means light waves    can interfere with one another, either amplifying or canceling    other waves depending on how they are aligned. We use the    interference of laser light to make patterns of bright and dark    spots, which become the lattice. Just as electrons in real    graphene are attracted to certain positively charged areas of a    carbon hexagon, we can arrange our optical lattices so    ultracold atoms are attracted to or repelled from analogous    spots in them, depending on the wavelength of the laser light    that we use. Light with just the right energy (resonant light)    landing on an atom can change the state and energy of an    electron within it, imparting forces on the atom. We typically    use red-detuned optical lattices, which means the laser light    in the lattice has a wavelength that's longer than the    wavelength of the resonant light. The result is that the    rubidium atoms feel an attraction to the bright spots arranged    in a hexagonal pattern.  <\/p>\n<p>    We now have the basic ingredients for an artificial crystal.    Scientists first imagined these ultracold atoms in optical    lattices in the late 1990s and constructed them in the early    2000s. The spacing between the lattice points of these    artificial crystals is hundreds of nanometers rather than the    fractions of a nanometer that separate atoms in a solid    crystal. This larger distance means that artificial crystals    are effectively magnified versions of real ones, and the    hopping process of atoms within them is much slower, allowing    us to directly image the movements of the ultracold atoms. In    addition, we can manipulate these atoms in ways that aren't    possible with electrons.  <\/p>\n<p>    I was a postdoctoral researcher in the Ultracold Atomic Physics    group at the University of California, Berkeley, from 2019 to    2022. The lab there has two special tables (roughly one meter    wide by two and a half meters long by 0.3 meter high), each    weighing roughly one metric ton and floating on pneumatic legs    that dampen vibrations. Atop each table lie hundreds of optical    components: mirrors, lenses, light detectors, and more. One    table is responsible for producing laser light for trapping,    cooling and imaging rubidium atoms. The other table holds an    ultrahigh vacuum chamber made of steel with a vacuum pressure    less than that of low-Earth orbit, along with hundreds more    optical components.  <\/p>\n<p>    The vacuum chamber has multiple, sequential compartments with    different jobs. In the first compartment, we heat a five-gram    chunk of rubidium metal to more than 100 degrees Celsius, which    causes it to emit a vapor of rubidium atoms. The vapor gets    blasted into the next compartment like water spraying from a    hose. In the second compartment, we use magnetic fields and    laser light to slow the vapor down. The sluggish vapor then    flows into another compartment: a magneto-optical trap, where    it is captured by an arrangement of magnetic fields and laser    light. Infrared cameras monitor the trapped atoms, which appear    on our viewing screen as a bright glowing ball. At this point    the atoms are colder than liquid helium.  <\/p>\n<p>    We then move the cold cloud of rubidium atoms into the final    chamber, made entirely of quartz. There we shine both laser    light and microwaves on the cloud, which makes the warmest    atoms evaporate away. This step causes the rubidium to    transition from a normal gas to an exotic phase of matter    called a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC). In a BEC, quantum    mechanics allows atoms to delocalizeto spread out and overlap    with one another so that all the atoms in the condensate act in    unison. The temperature of the atoms in the BEC is less than    100 nanokelvins, one billion times colder than liquid nitrogen.  <\/p>\n<p>    At this point we shine three laser beams separated by 120    degrees into the quartz cell (their shape roughly forms the    letter Y). At the intersection of the three beams, the lasers    interfere with one another and produce a 2-D optical lattice    that looks like a honeycomb pattern of bright and dark spots.    We then move the optical lattice so it overlaps with the BEC.    The lattice has plenty of space for atoms to hop around, even    though it extends over a region only as wide as a human hair.    Finally, we collect and analyze pictures of the atoms after the    BEC has spent some time in the optical lattice. As complex as    it is, we go through this entire process once every 40 seconds    or so. Even after years of working on this experiment, when I    see it play out, I think to myself, Wow, this is incredible!  <\/p>\n<p>    Like real graphene, our artificial crystal has Dirac points in    its band structure. To understand why these points are    significant topologically, let's go back to our graph of energy    versus momentum, but this time let's view it from above so we    see momentum plotted in two directionsright and left, and up    and down. Imagine that the quantum state of the BEC in the    optical lattice is represented by an upward arrow at position    one (P1) and that a short, straight path separates P1 from a    Dirac point at position two (P2).  <\/p>\n<p>    To move our BEC on this graph toward the Dirac point, we need    to change its momentumin other words, we must actually move it    in physical space. To put the BEC at the Dirac point, we need    to give it the precise momentum values corresponding to that    point on the plot. It turns out that it's easier,    experimentally, to shift the optical latticeto change    its momentumand leave the BEC as is; this movement    gives us the same end result. From an atom's point of view, a    stationary BEC in a moving lattice is the same as a moving BEC    in a stationary lattice. So we adjust the position of the    lattice, effectively giving our BEC a new momentum and moving    it over on our plot.  <\/p>\n<p>    If we adjust the BEC's momentum so that the arrow representing    it moves slowly on a straight path from P1 toward P2 but just    misses P2 (meaning the BEC has slightly different momentum than    it needs to reach P2), nothing happensits quantum state is    unchanged. If we start over and move the arrow even more slowly    from P1 toward P2 on a path whose end is even closer tobut    still does not touchP2, the state again is unchanged.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now imagine that we move the arrow from P1 directly through    P2that is, we change the BEC's momentum so that it's exactly    equal to the value at the Dirac point: we will see the arrow    flip completely upside down. This change means the BEC's    quantum state has jumped from its ground state to its first    excited state.  <\/p>\n<p>    What if instead we move the arrow from P1 to P2, but when it    reaches P2, we force it to make a sharp left or right    turnmeaning that when the BEC reaches the Dirac point, we stop    giving it momentum in its initial direction and start giving it    momentum in a direction perpendicular to the first one? In this    case, something special happens. Instead of jumping to an    excited state as if it had passed straight through the Dirac    point and instead of going back down to the ground state as it    would if we had turned it fully around, the BEC ends up in a    superposition when it exits the Dirac point at a right angle.    This is a purely quantum phenomenon in which the BEC enters a    state that is both excited and not. To show the superposition,    our arrow in the plot rotates 90 degrees.  <\/p>\n<p>    Our experiment was the first to move a BEC through a Dirac    point and then turn it at different angles. These fascinating    outcomes show that these points, which had already seemed    special based on graphene's band structure, are truly    exceptional. And the fact that the outcome for the BEC depends    not just on whether it passes through a Dirac point but on the    direction of that movement shows that at the point itself, the    BEC's quantum state can't be defined. This shows that the Dirac    point is a singularitya place where physics is uncertain.  <\/p>\n<p>    We also measured another interesting pattern. If we moved the    BEC faster as it traveled near, but not through, the Dirac    point, the point would cause a rotation of the BEC's quantum    state that made the point seem larger. In other words, it    encompassed a broader range of possible momentum values than    just the one precise value at the point. The more slowly we    moved the BEC, the smaller the Dirac point seemed. This    behavior is uniquely quantum mechanical in nature. Quantum    physics is a trip!  <\/p>\n<p>    Although I just described our experiment in a few paragraphs,    it took six months of work to get results. We spent lots of    time developing new experimental capabilities that had never    been used before. We were often unsure whether our experiment    would work. We faced broken lasers, an accidental 10-degree-C    temperature spike in the lab that misaligned all the optical    components (there went three weeks), and disaster when the air    in our building caused the lab's temperature to fluctuate,    preventing us from creating a BEC. A great deal of persistent    effort carried us through and eventually led to our measuring a    phenomenon even more exciting than a Dirac point: another kind    of singularity.  <\/p>\n<p>    Before we embarked on our experiment, a related project with    artificial crystals in Germany showed what happens when a BEC    moves in a circular path around a Dirac point. This team    manipulated the BEC's momentum so that it took on values that    would plot a circle in the chart of left-momentum versus    up-down momentum. While going through these transformations,    the BEC never touched the Dirac point. Nevertheless, moving    around the point in this pattern caused the BEC to acquire    something called a geometric phasea term in the mathematical    description of its quantum phase that determines how it    evolves. Although there is no physical interpretation of a    geometric phase, it's a very unusual property that appears in    quantum mechanics. Not every quantum state has a geometric    phase, so the fact that the BEC had one here is special. What's    even more special is that the phase was exactly .  <\/p>\n<p>    My team decided to try a different technique to confirm the    German group's measurement. By measuring the rotation of the    BEC's quantum state as we turned it away from the Dirac point    at different angles, we reproduced the earlier findings. We    discovered that the BEC's quantum state wraps around the    Dirac point exactly once. Another way to say this is that as    you move a BEC through momentum space all the way around a    Dirac point, it goes from having all its particles in the    ground state to having all its particles in the first excited    state, and then they all return to the ground state. This    measurement agreed with the German study's results.  <\/p>\n<p>    This wrapping, independent of a particular path or the speed    the path is traveled, is a topological property associated with    a Dirac point and shows us directly that this point is a    singularity with a so-called topological winding number of 1.    In other words, the winding number tells us that after a BEC's    momentum makes a full circle, it comes back to the state it    started in. This winding number also reveals that every time it    goes around the Dirac point, its geometric phase increases by    .  <\/p>\n<p>    Furthermore, we discovered that our artificial crystal has    another kind of singularity called a quadratic band touching    point (QBTP). This is another point where two energy bands    touch, making it easy for electrons to jump from one to    another, but in this case it's a connection between the second    excited state and the third (rather than the ground state and    the first excited state as in a Dirac point). And whereas the    gap between energy bands near a Dirac point grows linearly, in    a QBTP it grows quadratically.  <\/p>\n<p>    In real graphene, the interactions between electrons make QBTPs    difficult to study. In our system, however, QBTPs became    accessible with just one weird trick.  <\/p>\n<p>    Well, it's not really so weird, nor is it technically a trick,    but we did figure out a specific technique to investigate a    QBTP. It turns out that if we give the BEC a kick and get it    moving before we load it into the optical lattice, we can    access a QBTP and study it with the same method we used to    investigate the Dirac point. Here, in the plot of momentum    space, we can imagine new points P3 and P4, where P3 is an    arbitrary starting point in the second excited band and a QBTP    lies at P4. Our measurements showed that if we move the BEC    from P3 directly through P4 and turn it at various angles, just    as we did with the Dirac point, the BEC's quantum state wraps    exactly twice around the QBTP. This result means the BEC's    quantum state picked up a geometric phase of exactly 2.    Correspondingly, instead of a topological winding number of 1,    like a Dirac point has, we found that a QBTP has a topological    winding number of 2, meaning that the state must rotate in    momentum space around the point exactly twice before it returns    to the quantum state it started in.  <\/p>\n<p>    This measurement was hard-won. We tried nearly daily for an    entire month before it eventually workedwe kept finding    fluctuations in our experiment whose sources were hard to    pinpoint. After much effort and clever thinking, we finally saw    the first measurement in which a BEC's quantum state exhibited    wrapping around a QBTP. At that moment I thought, Oh, my    goodness, I might actually land a job as a professor.    More seriously, I was excited that our measurement technique    showed itself to be uniquely suited to reveal this property of    a QBTP singularity.  <\/p>\n<p>    These singularities, with their strange geometric phases and    winding numbers, may sound esoteric. But they are directly    related to the tangible properties of the materials we studyin    this case the special abilities of graphene and its promising    future applications. All these changes that occur in the    material's quantum state when it moves through or around these    points manifest in cool and unusual phenomena in the real    world.  <\/p>\n<p>    Scientists have predicted, for instance, that QBTPs in solid    materials are associated with a type of exotic high-temperature    superconductivity, as well as anomalous properties that alter    the quantum Hall effect and even electric currents in materials    whose flow is typically protected, via topology, from    disruption. Before attempting to further investigate this    exciting physics, we want to learn more about how interactions    between atoms in our artificial crystal change what we observe    in our lab measurements.  <\/p>\n<p>    In real crystals, the electrons interact with one another, and    this interaction is usually quite important for the most    striking physical effects. Because our experiment was the first    of its kind, we took care to ensure that our atoms interacted    only minimally to keep things simple. An exciting question we    can now pose is: Could interactions cause a QBTP singularity to    break apart into multiple Dirac points? Theory suggests this    outcome may be possible. We look forward to cranking up the    interatomic interaction strength in the lab and seeing what    happens.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/physicists-make-matter-out-of-light-to-find-quantum-singularities\" title=\"Physicists Make Matter out of Light to Find Quantum Singularities - Scientific American\">Physicists Make Matter out of Light to Find Quantum Singularities - Scientific American<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Many seemingly mundane materials, such as the stainless steel on refrigerators or the quartz in a countertop, harbor fascinating physics inside them. These materials are crystals, which in physics means they are made of highly ordered repeating patterns of regularly spaced atoms called atomic lattices. How electrons move through a lattice, hopping from atom to atom, determines many of a solid's properties, such as its color, transparency, and ability to conduct heat and electricity.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/quantum-physics\/physicists-make-matter-out-of-light-to-find-quantum-singularities-scientific-american\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[257741],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1115222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-quantum-physics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1115222"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1115222"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1115222\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1115222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1115222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1115222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}