{"id":1114865,"date":"2023-05-24T17:59:22","date_gmt":"2023-05-24T21:59:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/uncategorized\/will-fees-alone-keep-the-bitcoin-network-secure-in-the-long-term-blockworks\/"},"modified":"2023-05-24T17:59:22","modified_gmt":"2023-05-24T21:59:22","slug":"will-fees-alone-keep-the-bitcoin-network-secure-in-the-long-term-blockworks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/bitcoin-2\/will-fees-alone-keep-the-bitcoin-network-secure-in-the-long-term-blockworks\/","title":{"rendered":"Will Fees Alone Keep the Bitcoin Network Secure in the Long Term? &#8211; Blockworks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The Bitcoin    network is secure. Like, really secure. For now, anyway.  <\/p>\n<p>    The amount of computing power crunching numbers to keep the    network operational makes it nearly impossible for any central    entity to overrun it.  <\/p>\n<p>    The most prominent of all decentralized networks achieves this    degree of security by rewarding competing miners all over the    world with bitcoin block rewards for guarding it from    attacks.  <\/p>\n<p>    This block subsidy diminishes through halvings that take    place every 210,000 blocks, or approximately four years.    Eventually, miners wont receive a subsidy at all, but will    instead rely strictly on transaction    fees for their revenues.  <\/p>\n<p>    But what if the fees     arent financially rewarding enough to attract miners? If    they decide its not worth securing the network, couldnt the    whole system fall apart?  <\/p>\n<p>    Founder of Lyn Alden Investment Strategy, Lyn Alden, and CIO of    Selini Capital, Jordi Alexander, spoke to Blockworks about the    conundrum on the Empire podcast.  <\/p>\n<p>    The long-term expectation from the beginning, even in    Satoshis own words, was that fees eventually would be the    primary and eventually only source of revenue for Bitcoin    miners, which is important for the long-term immutability and        censorship-resistance of the network, Alden says.  <\/p>\n<p>    The concern, according to Alden, is that Bitcoin block space    might not be attractive enough long-term for people to pay a    significant amount on a per-transaction basis in order to    settle value there or to do other things, in which case the    network becomes open to lower-cost attacks.  <\/p>\n<p>    Alexander argues that, other than the recent blip in traffic,    fee income is aggressively trending down. You have to pay    security guards to protect you when you have something    valuable, and if you start paying them less and less, a lot of    them dont show up for work.  <\/p>\n<p>    And if they dont show up to protect the network, he says,    you can have state actors or other actors coordinate, buy a    bunch of ASICs or whatever is going to be the technology at the    time to start spamming the network or blocking or censoring the    network.  <\/p>\n<p>    Alden suggests the fee model already works as designed and that    the network continues to see a gradual increase in adoption,    albeit in a cyclical manner. Since early 2023, transaction fees    have, in fact, increased. The longer that    Bitcoin keeps working and keeps doing what it does, and it    keeps being functional and keeps being understood by more and    more people, I expect that adoption to increase.  <\/p>\n<p>    Alexander suggests theres a free rider problem on the    network. Somebody just buys a lot and then they just sit on    it. They dont do anything. They dont even create fees.  <\/p>\n<p>    He argues that because many people have settled on the concept    of bitcoin as digital gold  primarily, a store of value  the    number of transactions could eventually trend to unsustainably    low levels.  <\/p>\n<p>    Alden counters, saying the network could thrive even with the    relatively low number of transactions from people using the    network strictly for settlement and savings. If you just    assume that five percent of the world in 20 years is going to    want to occasionally directly interact with the Bitcoin    base-layer, then theres going to be at least some degree of    sustained fee market.  <\/p>\n<p>    With only five percent of the worlds population using Bitcoin    occasionally and a base-layer transaction costing the    equivalent of $30 in the future, Alden says, Youre talking    billions and billions of dollars of annual fees for miners.  <\/p>\n<p>    The actual ASIC    value that you need to buy to even attempt an attack is in the    billions or tens of billions at that point.  <\/p>\n<p>    Get the days top crypto news and insights delivered to    your email every evening.Subscribe to    Blockworks free newsletternow.  <\/p>\n<p>    Want alpha sent directly to your inbox? Get degen trade    ideas, governance updates, token performance, cant-miss tweets    and more fromBlockworks    Researchs Daily Debrief.  <\/p>\n<p>    Cant wait? Get our news the fastest way    possible.Join us on Telegram and follow us on Google News.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/blockworks.co\/news\/bitcoin-network-secure-fees\" title=\"Will Fees Alone Keep the Bitcoin Network Secure in the Long Term? - Blockworks\" rel=\"noopener\">Will Fees Alone Keep the Bitcoin Network Secure in the Long Term? - Blockworks<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The Bitcoin network is secure.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/bitcoin-2\/will-fees-alone-keep-the-bitcoin-network-secure-in-the-long-term-blockworks\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94873],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1114865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bitcoin-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1114865"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1114865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1114865\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1114865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1114865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1114865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}