The argument for citizens wanting to keep their firearms often goes to \"They want to take away or Second Amendment\", but when it's thought about, citizens don't have a right to own semi-automatic weapons. Even those in the military are not able to keep their military firearms. Also, those in the military have to qualify each year to operate those weapons. So, why do those who are trained to operate those types of firearms have to qualify each year, but regular citizens do not?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The Randi Rhodes Show delivers smart, forward, free-thinking, entertaining, liberal news and opinion that challenge the status quo and amplify free speech. Dedicated to social justice, Randi puts her reputation on the line for the truth. Committed to the journalistic standards that corporate media often ignores, The Randi Rhodes Show takes enormous pride in bringing the power of knowledge to her viewers.<\/p>\n
Watch The Randi Rhodes Show every weekday at 3 pm ET on Free Speech TV & catch up with clips from the program down below!<\/p>\n
Missed an episode? Check out The Randi Rhodes Show on FSTV VOD anytime or visit the show page for the latest clips. #FSTV is available on Dish, DirectTV, AppleTV, Roku, Sling, and online at freespeech.org.<\/p>\n
Freedom Gun Laws Gun Reform Mass Shootings military weapons semi-automatic weapons Social Justice <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
More: The argument for citizens wanting to keep their firearms often goes to \"They want to take away or Second Amendment\", but when it's thought about, citizens don't have a right to own semi-automatic weapons. Even those in the military are not able to keep their military firearms. Continue reading
\nWhat is the Second Amendment used for? - Free Speech TV<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"