@Thanksgiving-Man<\/p>\n
> Niessa asked about privacy, not anonymity. Do you even know the difference Iron Heart?<\/p>\n
Dude, Tor provides anonymity, but it also provides privacy. Privacy is a subset of anonymity, Firefox lacks certain qualities that would be required for anonymity (like shared IP addresses of nodes). I know the difference, seems like you dont realize how the two relate to each other.<\/p>\n
> full state partitioning (networking partitioning and Total Cookie Protection) is more than the equivalent of Tor Browsers FPI<\/p>\n
*Yawn* Its not that much better, *[editor: removed].<\/p>\n
Also, cookies What year is it? Even Google doesnt care about that anymore, hence FLoC.<\/p>\n
> HTTPS-Only Mode is more than the equivalent of HTTPS-Everywheres EASE<\/p>\n
And? Every single browser has that these days, including most Chromium-based browsers.<\/p>\n
> have you even read it Iron Heart?<\/p>\n
No. Give me a good reason to read a website created by hobbyists who have never written a single line of code, listening to other people who are full of themselves but have also never written a single line of code!? Are these guys software engineers, do they know what they are talking about? I doubt it.<\/p>\n
Also, just like 97% of the overall internet population, I dont want \/ need \/ like Firefox, why should I read a guide discussing it, stating things I already know and already wasnt impressed by?<\/p>\n
> Tor Browser is no more private than Firefox with two setting changes<\/p>\n
LOL, clueless. Read up on the subject, suffice to say that you are wrong.<\/p>\n
> site Isolation: rollout is already at 100% for windows\/mac<\/p>\n
Wow, Chromium had this since 2018, three years ago. Welcome to the party with your immature implementation that can also be enabled in Tor btw.<\/p>\n
> further security features in RLBox<\/p>\n
Wow, yet another thing Chromium has had for years.<\/p>\n
> lets not forget latency and other usability issues with Tor Browser<\/p>\n
OK? OP asked for the most private browser, and despite slight usability issues of Tor, its not Firefox.<\/p>\n
> you can add uBlock Origin<\/p>\n
Yeah, have fun getting your chosen adblock lists fingerprinted no wonder Tor advises against installing it, contrary to the clueless hobbyists you listen to. Its definitely so much better than system- \/ network-wide blockers. Oh wait, it isnt.<\/p>\n
*[editor: removed]<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Link: @Thanksgiving-Man > Niessa asked about privacy, not anonymity. Continue reading
\nFirefox Monitor may remove personal information now from the Internet - Ghacks Technology News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"