Some of the most fundamental processes in nature occur at the microscopic scale, far beyond the limits of what we can see by eye, which motivates the development of technology that allows us to see beyond this limit. As early as the 4th century AD, people had discovered the basic concept of an optical lens, and by the 13th century, they were already using glass lenses to improve their eyesight and to magnify objects such as plants and insects to better understand them.1 With time, these simple magnifying glasses developed into advanced optical systems, known as light microscopes, which allow us to see and understand the microscopic world beyond the limits of our perception. Today, light microscopy is a core technique in many areas of science and technology, including life sciences, biology, materials sciences, nanotechnology, industrial inspection, forensics and many more. In this article, we will first explore the basic working principle of light microscopy. Building on this, we will discuss some more advanced forms of light microscopy that are commonly used today and compare their strengths and weaknesses for different applications.<\/p>\n
What is light microscopy?<\/p>\n
Parts of a microscope and how a light microscope works<\/p>\n
Early microscopes used an illumination system comprising sunlight that was collected and reflected onto the sample by a mirror. Today, most microscopes use artificial light sources such as light bulbs, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) or lasers to make more reliable and controllable illumination systems, which can be tailored to a given application. In these systems, light from the source is typically collected using a condenser lens and then shaped and optically filtered before being focused onto the sample. Shaping the light is essential to achieve high resolution and contrast, and often includes controlling the sample area that is illuminated and the angles at which light impinges on it. Optical filtering of the illumination light, using optical filters that modify its spectrum and polarization, can be used to highlight certain features of a sample, to improve the visibility of weak signatures or to observe a samples fluorescence.<\/p>\n
The imaging system collects illuminating light that has interacted with the sample and produces a magnified image that can be viewed (Figure 1). This is achieved using two main groups of optical elements: first, an objective lens that collects as much light from the sample as possible and second, an eyepiece lens which relays the collected light to the observers eye or a camera system. The imaging system may also include elements such as apertures and filters that select certain portions of light from the sample, for example to see only light that has been scattered off the sample, or only light of a certain color or wavelength. As in the case of the illumination system, this type of filtering can be extremely useful to single out certain features of interest that would remain hidden when imaging all the light from the sample.<\/p>\n
Overall, both the illumination and the imaging system play a key role in how well a light microscope performs. To get the best out of light microscopy in your application, it is essential to have a good understanding of how a basic light microscope works, and what variations exist today.<\/p>\n
Simple and compound microscopes<\/p>\n
A single lens can be used as a magnifying glass which increases the apparent size of an object when it is held close to the lens. Looking through the magnifying glass at the object, we see a magnified and virtual image of the object. This effect is used in simple microscopes, which consist of a single lens that images a sample held clamped into a frame and illuminated from below, as is shown in Figure 2. This type of microscope can achieve a magnification of typically 2-6 x, which is sufficient to study relatively large samples. However, achieving higher magnification and better image quality requires the use of more optical elements, which led to the development of the compound microscope (Figure 3).<\/p>\n
In a compound microscope, the sample is illuminated from the bottom to observe transmitted light, or from the top to observe reflected light. Light from the sample is collected by an optical system consisting of two main lens groups: the objective and the eyepiece, whose individual powers multiply to enable much higher magnifications than those achieved by a simple microscope. The objective collects light from the sample and typically has a magnification of 40-100 x. Some compound microscopes feature multiple objective lenses on a rotating turret known as a nose piece, allowing the user to choose between different magnifications. The image from the objective is picked up by the eyepiece, which magnifies the image again and relays it to the users eye, with typical eyepieces having a magnification of 10 x. Therefore, the total magnification of a compound microscope, which is the product of the objective magnification and the eyepiece magnification, typically lies in the range of 400-1000 x.<\/p>\n
r = 0.61 (\/NA)<\/p>\n
In standard compound microscopes (Figure 4a), the sample (often on a glass slide) is held on a stage that can be moved manually or electronically for higher precision, and the illumination system is in the lower part of the microscope, while the imaging system is above the sample. However, the microscope body can usually also be adapted to particular uses. For example, stereo microscopes (Figure 4b) feature two eyepieces at a slight angle to each other, allowing the user to see a slightly three-dimensional image. In many biology applications, an inverted microscope design (Figure 4c) is used, where both the illumination system and the imaging optics are below the sample stage to facilitate placing e.g., containers of cell cultures onto it. Finally, comparison microscopes (Figure 4d) were often used in forensics, for example to compare fingerprints or bullets by eye before the advent of digital microscopy, which allowed images to be saved and compared.<\/p>\n
Types of light microscopy<\/p>\n
In the following, we will present a selection of different light microscopy techniques available today, discuss their main operating principles and the strengths and weaknesses of each technique.<\/p>\n
Bright field microscopy (BFM) is the simplest form of light microscopy, where the sample is illuminated from above or below, and light transmitted through or reflected from it is collected to form an image that can be viewed. Contrast and color in the image are formed because absorption and reflection vary over the area of the sample. BFM was the first type of light microscopy developed and uses a relatively simple optical setup, which allowed early scientists to study microorganisms and cells in transmission. Today, it is still very useful for the same purposes, and is also widely used to study other partially transparent samples such as thin materials in transmission mode (Figure 5), or microelectronics and other small structures in reflection mode. However, the magnification of BFM is limited to 1300 x and it is not suitable for imaging highly transparent samples.<\/p>\n
Figure 5: Bright field microscopy. Left: Transmission mode - flakes of graphite (dark grey) and graphene (lightest grey) as seen in a bright field microscope. Here, the difference in brightness seen on the image is proportional to the thickness of the graphite layer. Right: Reflection mode - flakes of graphene and graphite on a SiO2 surface. Small surface contaminants are also visible. Credit: Author.<\/p>\n
Figure 7: Phase contrast microscopy of a human embryonic stem cell colony. Credit Sabrina Lin, Prue Talbot, Stem Cell Center University of California, Riverside.<\/p>\n
Figure 8: Differential interference contrast microscopy. Left: Schematic setup for DICM. Right: Live adult Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) nematode imaged by DICM. Credit: Bob Goldstein, Cell Image Library. Reproduced under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0).<\/p>\n
Figure 9: Polarization microscopy. Photomicrograph of olivine adcumulate, formed by the accumulation of crystals with different birefringence. Variations of thickness and refractive index across the sample result in different colors. Credit: R. Hill, CSIRO.<\/p>\n
Figure 10: Fluorescence microscopy. Left: Working principle - illumination light is filtered by a short-pass excitation filter and reflected towards the sample by a dichroic mirror. Fluorescence from the sample passes the dichroic mirror and is additionally filtered by an emission filter to remove residual excitation light in the image. Right: Fluorescence image of molecules hosted in an organic crystal (crystal outline shown dashed yellow). The background is not completely dark due to fluorescence from other molecules and the crystal material. Credit: Author.<\/p>\n
Figure 11: Immunofluorescence microscopy. Two interphase cells with immunofluorescence labeling of actin filaments (purple), microtubules (yellow), and nuclei (green). Credit: Torsten Wittmann, NIGMS Image Gallery.<\/p>\n
A disadvantage of TPM is that the probability of two-photon absorption is much lower than single-photon absorption and thus requires high-intensity illumination such as pulsed lasers to achieve a practical fluorescence signal intensity.<\/p>\n
Figure 13: Two-photon microscopy. Thin optical section of pollen, showing fluorescence mostly form the outer layers. Credit: Michael Cammer, Cell Image Library.<\/p>\n
Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) is a fluorescence microscopy technique that allows 2D fluorescence images to be made of an extremely thin (approximately 100 nm thick) sample slice.10 This is achieved by exciting the fluorescence of the sample by evanescent fields of the illuminating light, which occur when it undergoes total internal reflection at a boundary between two materials of different refractive index (n). Evanescent fields have the same wavelength as the illuminating light but are tightly bound to the interface. In TIRF microscopy, the excitation light typically undergoes total internal reflection at the interface between a glass slide (n = 1.52) and the aqueous medium (n = 1.35) the sample is dispersed in. The intensity of the evanescent field falls off exponentially with distance from the interface, such that only fluorophores close the interface are observed in the final image. This also leads to a strong suppression of fluorescence background from areas outside the slice, which allows weak fluorescence signals to be picked up, for example when localizing single molecules. This makes TIRF extremely useful to observe the weak signal of fluorescent proteins (Figure 15) involved in intercellular interactions, but also requires the sample to be dispersed in an aqueous medium, which may limit the types of samples that can be measured.<\/p>\n
Figure 16: Sample preparation for expansion microscopy. A cell is first stained and then linked to a polymer gel matrix. The cell structure itself is then dissolved (digested), allowing the stained parts to expand isotropically with the gel, allowing the stained structure to be imaged with more detail.<\/p>\n
Deconvolution in light microscopy<\/p>\n
Figure 17: Image deconvolution. Left: Original fluorescence image. Right: Image after deconvolution, showing increased detail. Credit: Author.<\/p>\n
Light microscopy vs electron microscopy<\/p>\n
Summary and conclusion<\/p>\n
Light microscopy techniques comparison table<\/p>\n
Technique<\/p>\n
Advantages<\/p>\n
Limitations<\/p>\n
Typical applications<\/p>\n
Bright field microscopy<\/p>\n
Relatively simple setup with few optical elements<\/p>\n
Low contrast, fully transparent objects cannot be imaged directly and may require staining<\/p>\n
Imaging colored or stained samples15 and partially transparent materials16<\/p>\n
Dark field microscopy <\/p>\n
Reveals small structures and surface roughness, allows imaging of unstained samples<\/p>\n
High illumination power required can damage the sample, only scattering image features seen<\/p>\n
Imaging particles in cells,17 surface inspection18<\/p>\n
Phase contrast microscopy<\/p>\n
Enables imaging of transparent samples<\/p>\n
Complex optical setup, high illumination power required can damage the sample, generally darker images <\/p>\n
Tracking cell motion,19 imaging larvae20<\/p>\n
Differential interference contrast microscopy<\/p>\n
Higher resolution than PCM <\/p>\n
Complex optical setup, high illumination power required can damage the sample, generally darker images <\/p>\n
High resolution imaging of live, unstained cells21 and nanoparticles22<\/p>\n
Polarized light microscopy<\/p>\n
Strong background suppression from non-birefringent areas of a sample, allows measurement of sample thickness and birefringence<\/p>\n
Requires a birefringent sample<\/p>\n
Imaging collagen,23 revealing grain boundaries in crystals24<\/p>\n
Fluorescence microscopy<\/p>\n
Allows individual fluorophores and particular areas of interest in a sample to be singled out, can overcome the resolution limit<\/p>\n
Requires a fluorescent sample and a sensitive detector, photobleaching can diminish signal<\/p>\n
Imaging cell components, single molecules, proteins25<\/p>\n
Immunofluorescence microscopy <\/p>\n
Visualize specific biomolecules using antibody targeting<\/p>\n
Extensive sample preparation, requires a fluorescent sample, photobleaching<\/p>\n
Identifying and tracking cells26 and proteins27<\/p>\n
Confocal microscopy <\/p>\n
Low background signal, possible to create 3D images<\/p>\n
Slow imaging speed, requires a complicated optical system<\/p>\n
3D cell imaging, imaging samples with weak fluorescence signals, surface profiling28.<\/p>\n
Two-photon microscopy <\/p>\n
Deep sample penetration, low background signal, less photobleaching<\/p>\n
Slow imaging speed, requires a complicated optical system and high-power illumination<\/p>\n
Neuroscience,29 deep tissue imaging30<\/p>\n
Light sheet microscopy <\/p>\n
Images only an extremely thin slice of the sample, can create 3D images by rotating the sample<\/p>\n
Slow imaging speed, requires a complicated optical system<\/p>\n
3D imaging of cells and organisms8<\/p>\n
Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy<\/p>\n
Strong background suppression, extremely fine vertical sectioning<\/p>\n
Imaging limited to thin area of sample, requires a complicated optical system, sample needs to be in aqueous medium<\/p>\n
Single molecule imaging,31 imaging molecular trafficking32<\/p>\n
Expansion microscopy <\/p>\n
Increases effective resolution of standard fluorescence microscopy<\/p>\n
Requires chemical processing of the sample, not suitable for live samples<\/p>\n
High resolution imaging of biological samples11<\/p>\n
B<\/p>\n
References1.Rochow TG, Tucker PA. A Brief History of Microscopy. In: Introduction to Microscopy by Means of Light, Electrons, X Rays, or Acoustics. Springer US; 1994:1-21. doi:10.1007\/978-1-4899-1513-9_12.Smith WJ. Modern Optical Engineering: The Design of Optical Systems. McGraw-Hill; 1990. ISBN: 00705917413.Shribak M, Inou S. Orientation-independent differential interference contrast microscopy. Collected Works of Shinya Inoue: Microscopes, Living Cells, and Dynamic Molecules. 2008;(Dic):953-962. doi:10.1142\/9789812790866_00744.Gao G, Jiang YW, Sun W, Wu FG. Fluorescent quantum dots for microbial imaging. Chinese Chem Lett. 2018;29(10):1475-1485. doi:10.1016\/j.cclet.2018.07.0045.Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward W, Prasher D. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science. 1994;263(5148):802-805. doi:10.1126\/science.83032956.Baranov M V., Olea RA, van den Bogaart G. Chasing Uptake: Super-Resolution Microscopy in Endocytosis and Phagocytosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29(9):727-739. doi:10.1016\/j.tcb.2019.05.0067.Miller DM, Shakes DC. Chapter 16 Immunofluorescence Microscopy. In: Current Protocols Essential Laboratory Techniques. Vol 10.; 1995:365-394. doi:10.1016\/S0091-679X(08)61396-58.Huisken J, Swoger J, Del Bene F, Wittbrodt J, Stelzer EHK. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science. 2004;305(5686):1007-1009. doi:10.1126\/science.11000359.Huisken J. Slicing embryos gently with laser light sheets. BioEssays. 2012;34(5):406-411. doi:10.1002\/bies.20110012010.Fish KN. Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy. Curr Protoc Cytom. 2009;50(1):273-275. doi:10.1002\/0471142956.cy1218s5011.Wassie AT, Zhao Y, Boyden ES. Expansion microscopy: principles and uses in biological research. Nat Methods. 2019;16(1):33-41. doi:10.1038\/s41592-018-0219-412.Lam F, Cladire D, Guillaume C, Wassmann K, Bolte S. Super-resolution for everybody: An image processing workflow to obtain high-resolution images with a standard confocal microscope. Methods. 2017;115:17-27. doi: 10.1016\/j.ymeth.2016.11.00313.Hedvat C V. Digital microscopy: past, present, and future. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(11):1666-1670. doi: 10.5858\/2009-0579-RAR1.114.Fatermans J, den Dekker AJ, Mller-Caspary K, et al. Single Atom Detection from Low Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Electron Microscopy Images. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;121(5):56101. doi:10.1103\/PhysRevLett.121.05610115.Zhang C, Huber F, Knop M, Hamprecht FA. Yeast cell detection and segmentation in bright field microscopy. In: 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI); 2014:1267-1270. doi:10.1109\/ISBI.2014.686810716.Nair RR, Blake P, Grigorenko AN, et al. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene. Science. 2008;320(5881):1308-1308. doi:10.1126\/science.115696517.Xu D, He Y, Yeung ES. Direct Imaging of Transmembrane Dynamics of Single Nanoparticles with Darkfield Microscopy: Improved Orientation Tracking at Cell Sidewall. Anal Chem. 2014;86(7):3397-3404. doi:10.1021\/ac403700u18.Neu-Baker NM, Dozier AK, Eastlake AC, Brenner SA. Evaluation of enhanced darkfield microscopy and hyperspectral imaging for rapid screening of TiO2 and SiO2 nanoscale particles captured on filter media. Microsc Res Tech. doi:10.1002\/jemt.2385619.Li K, Miller ED, Weiss LE, Campbell PG, Kanade T. Online Tracking of Migrating and Proliferating Cells Imaged with Phase-Contrast Microscopy. In: 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW06); 2006:65. doi:10.1109\/CVPRW.2006.15020. McFadzean JA, Smiles J. Studies of Litomosoides carinii by Phase-contrast microscopy: the Development of the Larvae. J Helminthol. 1956;30(1):25-32. doi:10.1017\/S0022149X0003294621.Sun W, Wang G, Fang N, Yeung ES. Wavelength-dependent differential interference contrast microscopy: selectively imaging nanoparticle probes in live cells. Anal Chem. 2009;81(22):9203-9208. doi: 10.1021\/ac901623b22.Xiao L, Ha JW, Wei L, Wang G, Fang N. Determining the full three-dimensional orientation of single anisotropic nanoparticles by differential interference contrast microscopy. Angew Chemie Int Ed. 2012;51(31):7734-7738. doi: 10.1002\/anie.20120234023.Wolman M, Kasten FH. Polarized light microscopy in the study of the molecular structure of collagen and reticulin. Histochemistry. 1986;85(1):41-49. doi:10.1007\/BF0050865224.Slmov M, Oenek V, Vander Voort G. Polarized light microscopy: utilization in the investigation of the recrystallization of aluminum alloys. Mater Charact. 2004;52(3):165-177. doi:10.1016\/j.matchar.2003.10.01025.Lichtman JW, Conchello J-A. Fluorescence microscopy. Nat Methods. 2005;2(12):910-919. doi:10.1038\/nmeth81726.Franke W, Appelhans B, Schmid E, Freudenstein C, Osborn M, Weber K. Identification and characterization of epithelial cells in mammalian tissues by immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies to prekeratin. Differentiation. 1979;15(1-3):7-25. doi:10.1111\/j.1432-0436.1979.tb01030.x27.Seto S, Layh-Schmitt G, Kenri T, Miyata M. Visualization of the attachment organelle and cytadherence proteins of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by immunofluorescence microscopy. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(5):1621-1630. doi:10.1128\/JB.183.5.1621-1630.200128.Pawley J, Pawley JB. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. 2006;(August 2010). doi:10.1007\/978-0-387-45524-229.Ellis-Davies GCR. Two-Photon Microscopy for Chemical Neuroscience. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2011;2(4):185-197. doi:10.1021\/cn100111a30.Helmchen F, Denk W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat methods. 2005;2(12):932-940. doi:10.1038\/nmeth81831.Sako Y, Uyemura T. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy for single-molecule imaging in living cells. Cell Struct Funct. 2002;27(5):357-365. doi:10.1247\/csf.27.35732.Axelrod D. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy in cell biology. Traffic. 2001;2(11):764-774. doi:10.1034\/j.1600-0854.2001.21104.x<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the rest here:<\/p>\n
An Introduction to the Light Microscope, Light Microscopy Techniques and Applications - Technology Networks<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Some of the most fundamental processes in nature occur at the microscopic scale, far beyond the limits of what we can see by eye, which motivates the development of technology that allows us to see beyond this limit. As early as the 4th century AD, people had discovered the basic concept of an optical lens, and by the 13th century, they were already using glass lenses to improve their eyesight and to magnify objects such as plants and insects to better understand them.1 With time, these simple magnifying glasses developed into advanced optical systems, known as light microscopes, which allow us to see and understand the microscopic world beyond the limits of our perception. Today, light microscopy is a core technique in many areas of science and technology, including life sciences, biology, materials sciences, nanotechnology, industrial inspection, forensics and many more Continue reading