{"id":1002999,"date":"2021-03-09T13:41:58","date_gmt":"2021-03-09T18:41:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/karnataka-hc-to-hear-petition-challenging-amendment-to-bda-act-on-april-5-live-law-indian-legal-news\/"},"modified":"2021-03-09T13:41:58","modified_gmt":"2021-03-09T18:41:58","slug":"karnataka-hc-to-hear-petition-challenging-amendment-to-bda-act-on-april-5-live-law-indian-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fourth-amendment\/karnataka-hc-to-hear-petition-challenging-amendment-to-bda-act-on-april-5-live-law-indian-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka HC To Hear Petition Challenging Amendment To BDA Act On April 5 &#8211; Live Law &#8211; Indian Legal News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>The Karnataka High Court on Monday  said it would on April 5 hear two petitions challenging the State amendment to  the Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, which came into force on  July 10, 2020 and the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Fourth Amendment)  Act KTCP Amendment Act which came into force on July 31, 2020.<\/p>\n<p>The BDA Amendment Act seeks to inter  alia, legalize the illegal occupation and construction on lands owned by the  Bengaluru Development Authority. A division bench of Chief Justice  Abhay Oka and Justice S Vishwajith Shetty was informed that the state  government has not filed its statement of objections to the petition. To which  the court orally said \"One more instance of Covid-legislation. Ultimately the  state will have to defend it. Amendment is by the state government.  So it will  have to respond.\"<\/p>\n<p>During the hearing the bench pointed  to few provisions and raised its objection. It said \"One provision goes to the  extent of saying that  even land if  acquired and not needed can be given back to the owner.\"<\/p>\n<p>Senior Advocate Harish Narasappa  appearing for the petitioner submitted \"Not only that even if someone is in  unauthorized occupation even he can be given. That is the egregious portion of  the amendment. \"While the party in person K B  Vijayakumar submitted that \"Even occupier of the property can apply for  regularization.\" However, the state government advocate informed the court that  safeguards are put in place.<\/p>\n<p> The petition filed by Vijayan Menon  states that \"The BDA Amendment Act, like the Akrama Sakrama Scheme, is  prima facie violative of Articles 14, 21 and 243ZE of the Constitution of India  and is also contrary to the existing provisions of the Bengaluru Development  Authority Act, 1976.\"<\/p>\n<p>\"The implementation of the BDA  Amendment Act would render infructuous the current challenge to the Akrama  Sakrama Scheme. The BDA Amendment Act detrimentally affects the residents of  Bengaluru as the said Amendment Act incentivises land grabbers to illegally  occupy government lands as the said illegal occupation would later on be  legalized and regularized as a result of the said Amendment Act. The KTCP  Amendment Act seeks to allow an increase in the floor area ratio for buildings  by mere payment of premium charges to the Government.\"<\/p>\n<p>It is further said that \"The  BDA Amendment Act, prospectively penalizes jurisdictional officers for their  failure to prevent unauthorised constructions\/occupations on BDA land from the  date of the commencement of the BDA Amendment Act. In effect, the same amounts  to excusing the jurisdictional officers for failure to prevent the unauthorized  constructions\/occupations on BDA lands prior to the date of the commencement of  the BDA Amendment Act.\"<\/p>\n<p>It is also claimed that The BDA  Amendment Act has been enacted without due public consultation and the BDA  Amendment Act has been enacted without having been brought to the notice of the  Bangalore Metropolitan Planning BMPC which is a constitutional body set up  under Section 503-B of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 in  accordance with Article 243ZE of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p>The plea says that if urgent interim  reliefs and \/ or measures are not passed, it would result in irreversible  damage to the urban landscape of the Bengaluru Metropolitan Area as several  unauthorised constructions will be rendered legal.<\/p>\n<p>The petition prays for a declaration that the  BDA Amendment Act, the KTCP Amendment Act and the KTCP Amended Rules  Notification as violative of Articles 14, 21 and 243ZE of the Constitution of  India<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See more here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.livelaw.in\/news-updates\/karnataka-hc-to-hear-petition-challenging-amendment-to-bda-act-on-april-5-170895\" title=\"Karnataka HC To Hear Petition Challenging Amendment To BDA Act On April 5 - Live Law - Indian Legal News\" rel=\"noopener\">Karnataka HC To Hear Petition Challenging Amendment To BDA Act On April 5 - Live Law - Indian Legal News<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The Karnataka High Court on Monday said it would on April 5 hear two petitions challenging the State amendment to the Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, which came into force on July 10, 2020 and the Karnataka Town and Country Planning (Fourth Amendment) Act KTCP Amendment Act which came into force on July 31, 2020. The BDA Amendment Act seeks to inter alia, legalize the illegal occupation and construction on lands owned by the Bengaluru Development Authority.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/fourth-amendment\/karnataka-hc-to-hear-petition-challenging-amendment-to-bda-act-on-april-5-live-law-indian-legal-news\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94879],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1002999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fourth-amendment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1002999"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1002999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1002999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1002999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1002999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/prometheism-transhumanism-posthumanism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1002999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}