Imagine society as a ladder. At the top, youll find wealth and status. At the bottom, poverty and discrimination.
Where we start life on the ladder is largely a function of the ovarian lottery.
For almost everyone, there are rungs above you representing people with more wealth and status. There are also almost always rungs below you too.
People on lower rungs might be willing to trade positions with you in a heartbeat if it was an option.
Some people climb the ladder of society toward wealth and status with ease. Others struggle just to stay in the same spot, fighting not to slip down several rungs.
Meritocracy believers would say people who progress up the ladder do so thanks to talent, hard work and their performance. Some will tell you poverty is a personality defect.
Those who say meritocracy is a myth suggest human biases and our personal networks play a significant role in any movement on that ladder. Theyre more inclined to say poverty comes from a lack of cash, not a lack of character.
Whichever your opinion, it turns out the length of that ladder the distance between the top and bottom rungs matters.
It impacts your happiness. And perhaps not in the way youd think.
You might suppose that the more rungs there are the larger the gap between the top and bottom the happier youd be if youre near the top.
After all, the top of a longer ladder means youre better off, relatively speaking, than more people. Surely thats a little buzz of satisfaction?
If were measured against the metaphorical top rung which by most metrics in Australia would be a white man then that demographic must be happy as pigs in the proverbial, right?
Nope. At least, not as happy as they could be.
It turns out the inverse is true. A bigger gap means less happiness, not more.
The gap between the top and bottom rungs of that metaphorical ladder represents equity.
The smaller the gap, the more equity citizens enjoy. As the gap widens, a society becomes less equitable. And everyone in that society is less happy as a result.
Thats right: inequity is making you unhappy. Yes, you. Whoever you are.
That may seem a bold claim, but I dont need to know you for this to be true. Its that universal.
Whether youre on the uppermost rung which tends to be occupied by members of majorities or clinging to the very bottom, the more inequity in your community, the less happy youll be.
Those at the top are probably happy, or at least more comfortable in their misery. But theyre still missing out, because they could be happier.
Happiness is not a finite resource there arent limited units of happiness in the world. If you become happier, I dont have to give up some of my happiness.
In short, a more equitable society is in everyones interests. We all stand to gain from it.
This is no small task.
Listening to the Black Lives Matter movement in recent weeks, I gather the answer may include:
In short, its clear its time for some big changes.
Even if some of us are in denial (Im looking at you, Mr There was no slavery in Australia Morrison) it seems inevitable that change must come.
Yet, I find myself sceptical that lasting change can be achieved because Western societys track record for such change isnt great.
I hope Im wrong, but my fears are not unfounded.
For example, its been more than half a century since the womens rights movement began, yet the gender pay gap is 22% where I live in Western Australia and the gender retirement gap was 52% in 2013/14 in Australia. Weve had at best glacial progress in recent years.
Then theres racial inequity. As a white woman, I might earn less on average than a man but Im still a heck of a lot better off than an Aboriginal woman in WA. She can expect to earn 30% less than me. And thats 12 years after Kevin Rudd said sorry.
She can also expect to earn 30% less than an Aboriginal man, as it turns out non-Indigenous women and Indigenous men have similar earning expectations in WA4. The gender gap applies regardless of race.
I take from this that systemic change is bloody hard, to achieve and to maintain.
Machiavelli captured why beautifully in The Prince:
It ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.
Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new.
This coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them.
But does that make it impossible?
When faced with a massive obstacle, you can chip away at it slowly or you can blow it to pieces. The former takes a long time; the latter risks collateral damage.
or you can look for a lever.
If we want swift systemic change that improves equity without risking collateral damage, we need to find a lever: the smallest change we can make to have the biggest impact in the shortest time.
And I reckon that lever is universal basic income (UBI).
The concept of UBI is:
Thats right. No exclusion questions. No maze of paperwork to get it. No threat of it being withdrawn at short notice.
Automatic handouts based on your age and your citizenship.
The aim: no one falls below the poverty line.
In Australia, thats an income of $23,764 a year for a single adult. In theory, thats enough to afford basic housing and food even if you didnt go to work. If that doesnt sound like much, please remember its about what age pensioners live on right now.
Was your first thought
Chalk that up as a point for capitalist brainwashing, but its not true.
I wont regurgitate all of Rutger Bregmans collated research findings on UBI in Utopia for Realists here. Suffice to say its well worth a read. He found most people still continue to work and earn an income when a UBI is in place.
In summary, his other findings were:
If youre curious about the stats, read chapters two to four of Utopia for Realists.
The upshot is that the free market model we base our economy on has reached its limits. The marginal good more can do our citizens and country is diminishing.
Weve got enough wealth. Now we need to improve access to it.
Which is why some people like the exceptional Eva Cox prefer the term social contract to UBI. This is about progressing as a society so no one need live in poverty. In a country as rich as Australia, that seems a total no-brainer.
I reckon UBIs got massive flow-on potential for race and gender equity because when your basic living costs are covered, you dont have to choose between a roof over your head and your morals.
In short, you can afford not to put up with inequitable treatment.
For example, you can leave an employer who doesnt behave ethically. You may be able to escape an abusive relationship. You can report discrimination. Because you wont end up completely broke if someone with more relative power decides to cut off your money supply whether thats a wage, an allowance or through damage to your reputation.
If more people felt secure enough financially to do these things, might we not see societal change as a result? I think so.
Even if you can do all of the above already, UBI can still benefit you.
My basic income has meant:
I did it the capitalist way.
I saved, bought assets, and now derive income from them.
Which is the premise of the Financially Independent, Retiring Early (FIRE) movement.
Or Financially Independent, Time Rich (FITR) as I prefer to call it, because indefinitely retiring early turned out to be good in theory only.
Anyone aiming for FI is doing the same thing. Theyre putting a floor under their income. No matter where they are, no matter what theyre doing, their living costs are provided by their assets, not their wages.
Like a proper capitalist, Ive played the hand Ive got at the metaphorical poker table of life. I chose a high-paying profession so I could get to FI quicker, and I spent less than my mates to add further speed.
But I had to do it myself.
A basic income guarantee is like a socialist version of FIRE or FITR.
Instead of having to go through the process of earning, saving and investing to generate enough income to cover basic living costs, its a gimme.
This can help level the playing field from age 18 on, bringing us closer to an equitable society.
So, how much will this cost?
As of September 2019, Australias population included 19,754,496 adults, ages 18 or over. Lets call it 20 million.
The official poverty line is $23,764 lets call it $24k5.
$24kpa multiplied by 20 million people = $480 billion each year.
So yes, this is expensive.
But you dont actually fork out $480 billion a year to achieve it.
You use tax exemptions and deductions to deliver the UBI to those earning above that $24,000 limit. In practice, that means raising the tax-free threshold from $18,200 to $24,000. That portion of the UBI becomes foregone tax revenue as opposed to cash you have to find. Remember: most people keep working. Income from wages dropped less than 5% in one long-term UBI study6.
Anyone who earns less than $24,000 gets topped up to that level. Hence the idea of a guarantee.
And we havent yet counted cost savings, remembering that UBI has delivered a net economic gain in its experiments and case studies. Cash handed out is offset by:
There are many other benefits with long-term upside for society, such as high school completion rates rising and teen pregnancy rates dropping. For the full rundown, again I recommend chapters two to four of Utopia for Realists6.
Do we really believe COVID-19 is our last lockdown?
Do we really believe we wont need JobKeeper, JobSeeker, and early super access plans if another pandemic happens?
If everyone had a basic income guarantee before COVID-19, perhaps we wouldnt have needed economic stimulus of such magnitude. We might not have seen 1.3 million people taking money out of superannuation early.
You could see a UBI as mitigating future potential losses. The risk of such losses seems quite high at the moment.
UBI is an idea whose time has come. Will we have the guts to consider it? I hope so.
We wont be the first, but we can be next.
View original post here:
- Minister Martin: We can protect our artists by covering their basic living costs - thejournal.ie - March 21st, 2021
- Clubhouse promises its accelerator participants either brand deals or $5K per month during the program - TechCrunch - March 16th, 2021
- Agenda: Is Universal Basic Income the key to tackling care leaver poverty? - HeraldScotland - March 7th, 2021
- Get creative to help artists through pandemic - The Guardian - February 16th, 2021
- The economy can't guarantee a job. It can guarantee a liveable income for other work - The Conversation AU - January 25th, 2021
- Donald Trump and Richard Nixon: 10 comparisons the Internet made to show POTUS is '10X worse' - MEAWW - January 15th, 2021
- Basic income for all: Has the Covid crisis given us a new economic model? - The Irish Times - November 29th, 2020
- Universal basic income has time come for it? Debate intensifies in pandemic - WRAL Tech Wire - November 29th, 2020
- We Need Universal Basic Income And We Need It Now - Scary Mommy - August 30th, 2020
- Prepare for the irreversible rise of non-profit activity everywhere - Livemint - August 26th, 2020
- Five Things You Need to Know to Start Your Day - Bloomberg - August 26th, 2020
- In the wake of Covid-19, time to consider basic income: Senate report - Investment Executive - July 15th, 2020
- COVID-19 on P.E.I.: What's happening Tuesday, July 14 - CBC.ca - July 15th, 2020
- COVID-19 on P.E.I.: What's happening Monday, July 13 - CBC.ca - July 15th, 2020
- COVID illuminates global inequalities in workers' rights and working conditions - University of Birmingham - June 24th, 2020
- Crypto Experts Reveal Thoughts: How Will Bitcoin Perform After the COVID-19 Crisis Has Passed? - Yahoo Finance - June 24th, 2020
- A universal basic income is less attractive if it needs to be paid for - American Enterprise Institute - June 17th, 2020
- KAREN FOSTER: Pandemic pay premium for grocery store employees a flash in the pan - TheChronicleHerald.ca - June 17th, 2020
- COVID-19: UN agencies warn against rising hunger in Latin America and the Caribbean - UN News - June 17th, 2020
- Why recovery needs to have children at its centre - Social Europe - June 17th, 2020
- Basic Income activism in the United States | BIEN - Basic Income News - June 6th, 2020
- When All Men Are Paid for Existing: Universal Basic Income Has Arrived - National Review - June 6th, 2020
- Local funds model the racial reckoning and renewal central to the COVID recovery - ImpactAlpha - June 6th, 2020
- National Security at the United Nations This Week (May 8-15) - Just Security - May 15th, 2020
- What is Basic Income? | Guaranteed Universal Basic Income - May 11th, 2020
- Basic Income Guarantee | Universal | UBI - May 11th, 2020
- Coronavirus is a crisis for the developing world, but here's why it needn't be a catastrophe - The Guardian - May 11th, 2020
- Universal Basic Income: Andrew Yang Was Pushing for It Long Before Coronavirus Pandemic - PopCulture.com - May 11th, 2020
- Starvation in the time of Corona: momentum for the Universal Basic Dividend - DiEM25 - May 11th, 2020
- Is this the beginning of a Universal Basic Income? - Yahoo Finance Australia - April 11th, 2020
- How the Pandemic Could Shape the Economy In the Future - TheStreet - April 11th, 2020
- After the pandemic, will there be a new status quo? - The Corner Economic - April 11th, 2020
- UK workers hit by the economic pain of coronavirus need an income guarantee - The Guardian - April 9th, 2020
- The complexities of a universal basic income - Knowable Magazine - April 9th, 2020
- How Are We Going to Pay for It? - Common Dreams - April 9th, 2020
- We're all socialists now | The Interpreter - The Interpreter - April 9th, 2020
- Out of the coronavirus crisis, a new kind of Britain must be born - The Guardian - April 9th, 2020
- Michael Clifford: Is it now time to give some real thought to Universal Basic Income in Ireland? - Irish Examiner - April 9th, 2020
- COVID-19 kicks over the economy - rabble.ca - April 9th, 2020
- Covid-19 Unmasks the Privilege of Isolation in Rio de Janeiro and All Brazil - RioOnWatch - April 9th, 2020
- How WhatsApp is making it more expensive to spread misinformation - The Verge - April 9th, 2020
- For artists and gig workers, expanded emergency benefit access is encouraging but worries about the post-COVID-19 future remain - Toronto Star - April 9th, 2020
- Will There Be a New Status Quo After COVID-19? - Qrius - April 9th, 2020
- Common Arguments Against Basic Income Don't apply to the Emergency BI - Basic Income News - March 31st, 2020
- I've lived through plenty of social shocks this time we must learn the lessons - The Guardian - March 31st, 2020
- How a Basic Income And Jobs Guarantee Can Save The Economy From Coronavirus - The National Interest - March 26th, 2020
- Draghi: we face a war against coronavirus and must mobilise accordingly | Free to read - Financial Times - March 26th, 2020
- Lockdown to fight coronavirus is going to hit most Indian workers very hard - Livemint - March 26th, 2020
- Universal basic income: what is it, how does it work and could it help fight the coronavirus crisis? - Telegraph.co.uk - March 24th, 2020
- It's time to move mountains to protect people we need universal basic income - The Guardian - March 24th, 2020
- Italy: Urgent petition in time of Corona Virus: Expanding the Citizen's Income Scheme! If Not Now, When? - Basic Income News - March 24th, 2020
- Coronavirus: Iain Duncan Smith says dont bring in universal basic income during pandemic as it would be disincentive to work - The Independent - March 24th, 2020
- Solidarity Economicsfor the Coronavirus Crisis and Beyond - The American Prospect - March 24th, 2020
- Trump's right: Congress should give Americans $1,000 right now to fight the coronavirus recession - The Conversation US - March 24th, 2020
- Covid-19s Economic Pain Is Universal. But Relief? Depends on Where You Live. - The New York Times - March 24th, 2020
- Who the government's coronavirus economic measures leave behind - Left Foot Forward - March 24th, 2020
- COVID-19 outbreak brings attention back to informal sector - Down To Earth Magazine - March 24th, 2020
- Coronavirus, Surveillance And The Redefinition Of The Social Contract - Forbes - March 24th, 2020
- Commentary: We need food, medicine and safety not tax cuts and corporate bailouts to face coronavirus - The Daily World - March 24th, 2020
- New Zealand Orders Month-Long Lockdown To Halt Spread Of Coronavirus - International Business Times - March 24th, 2020
- All the Coronavirus Tribes You've Met During the Outbreak - VICE - March 24th, 2020
- Fiscal Policies to Protect People During the Coronavirus Outbreak - International Monetary Fund - March 5th, 2020
- Column: Socialism is not the American way | Opinion - Duncan Banner - February 29th, 2020
- P.E.I. Premier Dennis King talks climate, economy and highs and lows in Part 2 of his year-end interview with The Guardian - The Journal Pioneer - January 3rd, 2020
- We need to test whether our millions in education aid is actually working - Financial Post - January 3rd, 2020
- A modern method of cutting poverty: Investigating what Universal Basic Income will mean for Northern families - Mancunian Matters - December 13th, 2019
- The Guardian view on Finlands new PM: a different type of leadership - The Guardian - December 13th, 2019
- Want to Retire in Harmony? Make Sure All Parts of Your Plan Are in Sync - Kiplinger's Personal Finance - December 13th, 2019
- Broadband for All could revolutionize wifi in UK, if it's possible - Inverse - November 30th, 2019
- California higher education hangs in the balance as UC, Cal State search for new leaders - Los Angeles Times - November 30th, 2019
- Food shopping at dollar stores - Brantford Expositor - August 22nd, 2017
- How Cities Can Rebuild the Social Safety Net - CityLab - August 20th, 2017
- Universal Basic Infrastructure to help decrease India's poverty - Economic Times - August 15th, 2017
- New Zealand Fabians host Basic Income panel - Basic Income News - August 14th, 2017
- Universal basic income proponent to speak in Boise - Idaho Press-Tribune - August 8th, 2017
- Is a Well-Paying Job the next Entitlement Program? - Big Think (blog) - August 6th, 2017
- DON PRIDMORE: Be careful what you wish for... - The Guardian - August 1st, 2017
- EDITORIAL: Island needs dollars, not data, to cope with poverty - The Guardian - July 27th, 2017
- Peterborough businesses claim $15 minimum wage hike could result in job cuts - Globalnews.ca - July 26th, 2017
- 9news.com | Should all Americans receive a guaranteed income? - 9NEWS.com - July 26th, 2017