For the real black holes that exist or get created in our Universe, we can observe the radiation ... [+] emitted by their surrounding matter, and the gravitational waves produced by the inspiral, merger, and ringdown phases. Although only a few X-ray binaries are known, LIGO and other gravitational wave detectors should be capable of filling in any mass gap ranges where black holes do abundantly exist.
If you take enough mass and compress it into a small enough volume of space, youll inevitably form a black hole. Any mass in the Universe will curve the fabric of spacetime around it, and the more severely curved that spacetime fabric is, the more difficult it is to escape from that masss gravitational pull. The smaller the volume becomes that your mass occupies, the faster youd have to travel, at the edge of that object, to actually escape it.
At some point, the escape velocity youd need to obtain would exceed the speed of light, which defines the critical threshold for forming a black hole. According to Einsteins General Relativity, any mass in a small enough volume would be sufficient to form a black hole. But in our physical reality, there are real limitations that our Universe is subjected to, and not every mathematical possibility comes to fruition. Many of the black holes that we could imagine forming simply dont in our Universe. To the best of our knowledge, heres whats impossible.
An illustration between the inherent uncertainty between position and momentum at the quantum level. ... [+] The better you know or measure a particle's position, the less well you know its momentum, as well as vice versa. Both position and momentum are better described by a probabilistic wavefunction than by a single value.
Black holes have a quantum limit. Below a certain scale, reality is not what it seems. Instead of matter and energy having specific properties that are limited only by our ability to measure it, weve found that there are inherently uncertain relationships between various properties. If you measure a particles position, youll know its uncertainty inherently less well. If you measure its lifetime or its behavior over extremely short timescales, the less well-known you can inherently know its intrinsic energy, or even its rest mass.
Theres an inherent limit to how well you can know any two complementary quantities simultaneously, which is the key point of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Even empty space if you were to remove all the various forms of matter and energy entirely exhibits this uncertainty. Well, if you consider a distance scale of ~10-35 m or smaller, the amount of time it would take a photon to cross it would be minuscule: ~10-43 s. On those short timescales, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle tells you that your energy uncertainty is so large, it corresponds (via E = mc) to a mass of about 22 micrograms: the Planck mass.
This visualization shows the fluctuations in the quantum vacuum under the strong interactions. On ... [+] smaller distance scales and over smaller timescales, the fluctuations in energy and momentum can be larger. Once you go down to Planck-scale sizes and distances, the fluctuations are indistinguishable from black holes: a clear indication that physics has broken down.
If you had a black hole a perfect singularity whose mass was 22 micrograms, how large would its event horizon be? The answer is that same distance scale (the Planck length) you started off with: ~10-35 m. This fact illustrates why physicists say that the laws of reality break down at the Planck scale: the quantum fluctuations that must spontaneously occur are so large in magnitude, on scales so minuscule, that theyre indistinguishable from black holes.
But those black holes would immediately decay, as the evaporation time due to Hawking radiation would be less than the Planck time: ~10-43 s. We know that the laws of physics we have, both in quantum physics and in General Relativity, cannot be trusted on these small distance scales or on these tiny timescales. If thats true, then we cannot accurately describe, with those same equations, a black hole whose mass is 22 micrograms or lower. Thats the quantum lower limit for how small a black hole can be in our Universe. Below it, any assertion we could make would be physically meaningless.
When a black hole is created of a very small mass, quantum effects arising from the curved spacetime ... [+] near the event horizon will cause the black hole to rapidly decay via Hawking radiation. The lower the mass of the black hole, the more rapid the decay is.
Black holes below a certain mass would all have evaporated away by now. One of the remarkable lessons from applying quantum field theory in the space around black holes is this: black holes arent stable, but will emit energetic radiation, eventually leading to their complete evaporation. This process, known as Hawking radiation, will someday cause every black hole within the Universe to evaporate.
Although theres a lot of confusion around why this happens much of which can be traced back to Hawking himself the key things you must understand are that:
As a result, lower-mass black holes evaporate more quickly than higher-mass ones. If our Sun were a black hole, it would take 1067 years to evaporate; if the Earth were one, it would evaporate much more quickly: in just ~1051 years. Our Universe, since the hot Big Bang, has existed for about 13.8 billion years, meaning any black holes less massive than ~1012 kg, or around the mass of all the humans on Earth combined, would already have evaporated away entirely.
Just as a black hole consistently produces low-energy, thermal radiation in the form of Hawking ... [+] radiation outside the event horizon, an accelerating Universe with dark energy (in the form of a cosmological constant) will consistently produce radiation in a completely analogous form: Unruh radiation due to a cosmological horizon.
Black holes below about ~2.5 solar masses probably dont exist. According to the laws of physics as we understand them, there are only a few ways that a black hole can be formed. You can take a large chunk of matter and let it gravitationally collapse; if theres nothing to stop or slow it down, it could collapse directly into a black hole. You could, alternatively, let a clump of matter contract down to form a star, and if that stars core is massive enough, it can eventually implode, collapsing down to form a black hole. Finally, you can take a stellar remnant that didnt quite make it like a neutron star and add mass, either through a merger or accretion, until it becomes a black hole after all.
In practice, we believe all of these methods occur, leading to the formation of the realistic black holes that form in our Universe. But below a certain mass threshold, none of these methods can actually give you a black hole.
The visible/near-IR photos from Hubble show a massive star, about 25 times the mass of the Sun, that ... [+] has winked out of existence, with no supernova or other explanation. Direct collapse is the only reasonable candidate explanation.
Weve seen clumps of matter suddenly wink out of existence, like stars that magically disappear. The most logical explanation, as well as the one that best fits the data, is that a fraction of stars do spontaneously collapse into a black hole. Unfortunately, they tend to be on the massive side: dozens of times as massive as our Sun at the very least.
Stars with massive cores do often end their lives in spectacular supernova explosions, where the cores of these stars do implode. If youre born with about 800% or more of our Suns mass, youre an excellent candidate for going supernova. The stars with less massive cores will eventually form neutron stars, with the more massive ones forming black holes. The heaviest neutron star ever discovered likely formed through this process, weighing in at 2.17 solar masses.
And finally, you can take object that are lighter than black holes like the aforementioned neutron stars and either allow them to accrete/siphon mass from a companion, or collide them with another massive, compact object. When they do, theres a chance they could form a black hole.
Numerical relativity simulation of the last few milliseconds of two inspiraling and merging neutron ... [+] stars. Higher densities are shown in blue, lower densities are shown in cyan. The final black hole is shown in gray; you can identify the transition from neutron star to black hole by the change in color.
Although there have been only two neutron star-neutron star mergers ever directly and definitively observed, theyve been incredibly informative. The second one, with a combined mass of about 3.4 solar masses, went directly to a black hole. But the first one, which had a combined mass of more like 2.7 solar masses, revealed a far more complex story. For a few hundred milliseconds, this rapidly-spinning, post-merger mass behaved like a neutron star. All of a sudden, however, it switched to behaving like a black hole. After that transition, it never went back.
What we now believe occurred is that theres a narrow mass range somewhere between 2.5 and maybe 2.8 solar masses where a collapsed objects like a neutron star can exist, but it requires a particularly high value for its rotation rate. If it drops below a critical value, and it will change its spin rate as it settles down to a more spherical shape, it will become a black hole. Below that lower value, there are only neutron stars and no black holes. Above that upper value, there are only black holes and no neutron stars. And in between, you can have both, but what youll ultimately wind up with depends on how fast the object is spinning.
The most massive black hole binary signal ever seen: OJ 287. This tight binary black hole system ... [+] takes on the order of 11-12 years to complete an orbit. Despite making an orbit 1/5th of a light year in size (hundreds of times the Sun-Pluto distance), it should merge in just thousands of years.
What about heavier black holes? Is there a gap where no black holes exist? Is there an upper limit to black hole masses? Black holes can get much, much heavier than just a few times the mass of our Sun. Initially, there were theoretical concerns that there might be a gap where black holes didnt exist; that appears to conflict with the data we now have after ~6 years of advanced LIGO. There was a worry that intermediate mass black holes might not exist, as theyve proven very difficult to find. However, they now appear to be out there as well, with superior data confidently revealing numerous examples.
There will be a limit to how big they can get, however, although we havent hit it just yet. Black holes approaching 100 billion solar masses have been found, and we even have our first candidate for crossing that vaunted threshold. As galaxies evolve, merge, and grow, so too can their central black holes. Far into the future, some galaxies may grow their black holes as large as ~100 trillion (1014) solar masses: 1000 times larger than todays largest black hole. Owing to dark energy, which drives distant galaxies apart in the expanding Universe, we fully expect that no black holes will ever grow substantially larger than this value.
Constraints on dark matter from Primordial Black Holes. There is an overwhelming set of pieces of ... [+] evidence that indicate there is not a large population of black holes created in the early Universe that comprise our dark matter.
What about primordial black holes: black holes that formed directly after the Big Bang? This is a sticky one, because theres no evidence that they exist. Observationally, many constraints have been placed on the idea, which has been around since the 1970s. When the Universe was born, we know some regions were denser than others. If one region was born with a density that was just ~68% greater than average, that entire region should inevitably collapse to form a black hole. While their masses cant be less than ~1012 kg, they could, in theory, have any value thats larger.
Unfortunately, we have the fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background to guide us. These temperature fluctuations correspond to the overdense and underdense regions in the early Universe, and show us that the overdense regions are only about ~0.003% denser than average. Its true: these are on larger scales than the ones wed look for black holes on. But with no compelling theoretical motivation for them, and no observational evidence in their favor, this idea remains purely speculative.
When matter collapses, it can inevitably form a black hole. Penrose was the first to work out the ... [+] physics of the spacetime, applicable to all observers at all points in space and at all instants in time, that governs a system such as this. His conception has been the gold standard in General Relativity ever since.
For a long time, the very notion of black holes was highly contentious. For about 50 years after they were first derived in General Relativity, no one was sure whether they could physically exist in our Universe. Roger Penroses Nobel-winning work demonstrated how their existence was possible; just a few years later, we discovered the first black hole in our own galaxy: Cygnus X-1. Now the floodgates are open, with stellar-mass, intermediate-mass, and supermassive black holes all known in great and ever-increasing numbers.
But theres a lower limit to black holes in the Universe: we believe that none exist below about 2.5 times the mass of the Sun. Additionally, while the heaviest black holes today are right around 100 billion solar masses, theyll eventually grow to be up to 1000 times as heavy as that. Studying black holes provides us with a unique window into the physics of our Universe and the nature of gravity and spacetime themselves, but they cant reveal everything. In our Universe, some black holes truly are impossible.
- How Quantum Physics Allows Us To See Back Through Space And Time - Forbes - May 14th, 2021
- Is everything predetermined? Why physicists are reviving a taboo idea - New Scientist - May 14th, 2021
- New evidence for electron's dual nature found in a quantum spin liquid . New experiments conducted at - Princeton University - May 14th, 2021
- A wobbling muon could unlock mysteries of the universe - Vox.com - May 14th, 2021
- Quantum science, particle physics and nanoscale motors awarded support from Eric and Wendy Schmidt Transformative Tech Fund - Princeton University - May 14th, 2021
- Quantum Computing In Finance Where We Stand And Where We Could Go - Science 2.0 - May 14th, 2021
- Pathogenic, auto-immune or viral, all diseases are actually epigenetic - The Times of India Blog - May 14th, 2021
- Outlook on the Quantum Technology Global Market to 2026 - - GlobeNewswire - May 14th, 2021
- Researchers confront major hurdle in quantum computing - University of Rochester - May 9th, 2021
- Can a Patent Be Valid and Invalid at the Same Time? - Bloomberg Law - May 9th, 2021
- Breaking the Laws of Physics: Steering Light to Places It Isnt Supposed to Go - SciTechDaily - May 9th, 2021
- Are We on the Brink of a New Age of Scientific Discovery? - SciTechDaily - May 9th, 2021
- Can you really put a price on your college major? - The Boston Globe - May 9th, 2021
- Physicist and jazz pianist combines music and science at Rochester - University of Rochester - May 7th, 2021
- On the marvels of physics | symmetry magazine - Symmetry magazine - May 7th, 2021
- What financial crises and quantum mechanisms have in common - The New Times - May 7th, 2021
- MIT Researcher Says UFO Research Could Lead to New Laws of Physics - Futurism - May 7th, 2021
- Collins Aerospace upgrades US Navy C-130 fleet with long-lasting wheels and carbon brakes - PRNewswire - May 7th, 2021
- Andy Weirs New Space Odyssey - The New York Times - May 3rd, 2021
- The coherence of light is fundamentally tied to the quantum coherence of the emitting particle - Science Advances - May 3rd, 2021
- The battle for free will in the face of determinism - The Guardian - May 3rd, 2021
- Tulane part of Navy/Army-funded research on improving communication - News from Tulane - May 3rd, 2021
- A clocks accuracy may be tied to the entropy it creates - Science News Magazine - May 3rd, 2021
- Wellness Wednesday advice: If going to be sad? Don't! - Campus Times - May 3rd, 2021
- Beyond Books: Creative ways to combat the summer slide - Chillicothe Gazette - May 3rd, 2021
- #PulpNonFiction: Advertisers, be clear about what you want to say and why! - Bizcommunity.com - May 3rd, 2021
- Q&A: Are We on the Brink of a New Age of Scientific Discovery? - University of Virginia - May 3rd, 2021
- In Quantum Physics, Reality Really Is What We Choose To Observe - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence - April 21st, 2021
- Multiple Realities | Physics - Denison University - April 21st, 2021
- IISER physicist Prof Arvind is Punjabi University VC - The Tribune - April 21st, 2021
- Theoretical Physicist Prof Arvind appointed Punjabi Varsity Vice Chancellor - The Tribune - April 21st, 2021
- A cosmologist throws light on a universe of bias - Salon - April 21st, 2021
- Recent Reports Of Overturned Scientific Theory Are Premature - Forbes - April 21st, 2021
- Helgoland by Carlo Rovelli - read an exclusive extract - RTE.ie - April 17th, 2021
- Researchers Visualize the Motion of Vortices in Quantum Superfluid Turbulence - SciTechDaily - April 17th, 2021
- Will we ever know exactly how the universe ballooned into existence? - Livescience.com - April 17th, 2021
- 'The Disordered Cosmos', A Contemplation of the Exclusionary Culture of Physics - The Wire Science - April 17th, 2021
- Albert Einstein Death Anniversary: How did the greatest physicists of all time die? - Free Press Journal - April 17th, 2021
- Half Life traces family complexities for a Milwaukee physics teacher - The Globe and Mail - April 17th, 2021
- Scott Aaronson Winner of 2020 ACM Prize In Computing - iProgrammer - April 17th, 2021
- Book Review: A Cosmologist Throws Light on a Universe of Bias - Undark Magazine - April 17th, 2021
- Realization of an ideal Weyl semimetal band in a quantum gas with 3D spin-orbit coupling - Science Magazine - April 17th, 2021
- Quantum computers are revealing an unexpected new theory of reality - New Scientist - April 15th, 2021
- Student's physics homework picked up by Amazon quantum researchers - News - The University of Sydney - April 15th, 2021
- The Big Theoretical Physics Problem At The Center Of The 'Muon g-2' Puzzle - Forbes - April 15th, 2021
- 615 Million Euros Awarded to Quantum Delta NL for Quantum Research in the Netherlands - HPCwire - April 15th, 2021
- The God Equation Review: One String Theory to Rule Them All - The Wall Street Journal - April 15th, 2021
- The Disordered Cosmos review: An insider take on physics and injustice - New Scientist News - April 15th, 2021
- Course explores 'Magic, Witchcraft and Healing' > News > USC Dornsife - USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences - April 15th, 2021
- How matters hidden complexity unleashed the power of nuclear physics - Science News Magazine - April 15th, 2021
- Scientists Perform First-ever Ultracold Atom Interferometry in Space, Leading to Possible Physics Breakthroughs - Science Times - April 15th, 2021
- The windswept German island that inspired quantum physics - Spectator.co.uk - April 6th, 2021
- Junior wins Goldwater scholarship | The Source | Washington University in St. Louis - Washington University Record - April 6th, 2021
- Raytheon Technologies Announces $500 Million Social Impact Initiative - PRNewswire - April 6th, 2021
- Raytheon Technologies to release first quarter results on April 27, 2021 - CapeNews.net - April 6th, 2021
- An Interstellar Trip with Einstein, Newton, and Tesla - EE Times India - April 6th, 2021
- Searching for New Physics in the Subatomic World - SciTechDaily - April 6th, 2021
- QCI Expands Sales and Marketing Team to Accelerate Growth and Advance Enterprise Adoption of Quantum Computing - GlobeNewswire - April 6th, 2021
- Quantum Physics to Disrupt Geospatial Industry over the Coming Decade - GIM International - April 4th, 2021
- Imaginarity: New Paper Says The Imaginary Part Of Quantum Mechanics Can Be Observed - Science 2.0 - April 4th, 2021
- The mystery of the muon's magnetism | symmetry magazine - Symmetry magazine - April 4th, 2021
- Your Guide to Products and Technologies That Are Pseudoscience - Interesting Engineering - April 4th, 2021
- 6 Quantum Computing Stocks to Invest in This Decade - Investment U - April 4th, 2021
- What if youre living in a simulation, but theres no computer? - The Next Web - April 4th, 2021
- Quantum physics: what to expect - Study International News - March 31st, 2021
- Helgoland by Carlo Rovelli review a meditation on quantum theory - The Guardian - March 31st, 2021
- 'Spacekime theory' could speed up research and heal the rift in physics - Big Think - March 31st, 2021
- Scientists Have Simulated The Primordial Quantum Structure of Our Universe - ScienceAlert - March 31st, 2021
- Post-Doctoral Research Associate Experimental Condensed Matter Physics job with ROYAL HOLLOWAY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON | 250229 - Times Higher Education... - March 31st, 2021
- No free will, no ideas: Physicist Brian Greene reduces everything to 'particles and fields' - National Catholic Reporter - March 31st, 2021
- Carlo Rovelli on his search for the theory of everything - Prospect - March 31st, 2021
- Do Alternate Realities Exist? This Artist's Machines Are Ready to Find Out - PCMag - March 31st, 2021
- After 50 Years, Physicists Confirm The Existence of an Elusive Quasiparticle - ScienceAlert - March 25th, 2021
- Helgoland by Carlo Rovelli review the mysteries of quantum mechanics - The Guardian - March 25th, 2021
- Quantum Week 2021 Unveils the Latest in Quantum Computing and Engineering - PRNewswire - March 25th, 2021
- QMAP Will Have Data Science and AI as Downstairs Neighbors - UC Davis - March 25th, 2021
- Has the black hole information paradox evaporated? - Symmetry magazine - March 25th, 2021
- Ultracold Quantum Collisions Have Been Achieved in Space for the First Time - Scientific American - March 25th, 2021
- Measuring the invisible - MIT News - March 25th, 2021
- Einsteins Fridge Review: Heated Arguments - The Wall Street Journal - March 25th, 2021