Aug 22 FEATURE MAIN, Live Local, NEWS & VIEWS No Comments on LIVE LOCAL, LIVE SMALL: What freedoms and liberties do we stand to lose?
The Guardian reported:
The warrant covers the people who own and operate the site, but also seeks to get the IP addresses of 1.3 million people who visited it, as well as the date and time of their visit, and information about what browser or operating system they used.
There are a variety of concerning aspects to this set of events. First, and most obviously, are those related to the First Amendment (freedom of speech and assembly) and the Fourth Amendment (protection from unreasonable search and seizure). The Department of Justice wants the IP addresses of every visitor to the siteand from that information the physical location of each visitor can be ascertained. It makes identification not all that difficult. Besides freedom of speech, there are questions about the scope of the warrant. The Fourth Amendment makes it clear a warrant must specify locations to be searched and probable cause. Orin Kerr noted in the Washington Post:
Courts have allowed the government to get a suspects entire email account, which the government can then search through for evidence. But is the collective set of records concerning a website itself so extensive that it goes beyond what the Fourth Amendment allows? In the physical world, the government can search only one apartment in an apartment building with a single warrant; it cant search the entire apartment building.
Additionally, one has to be concerned that one branch of government would use their power to collect private information about citizens it feels threatened by. It looks like a personal score to settle. People who disagree with the executive branch are to be identifiedand to what end specifically? Over 200 people have already been charged with felony rioting at the inauguration. Why does the Department of Justice need to identify 1.3 million people who might disagree with the executive branch? It is frightening not only for civil liberties but for what it can mean on the slippery slope of settling political scores with citizens. Ask the Mothers of the Disappeared in Argentina: This is dangerous.
At the end of June, the executive branch asked the states to turn over voter registration information for the voter fraud commission. The information requested voter rolls, dates of birth and the last four digits of social security numbers. North Carolinas bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement announced it would turn over publicly available information to the commission, but not social security numbers and dates of birth. Some states have refused to comply. I have to admit: The possibility of finding oneself purged from the voter rolls is a scary idea.
About 10 years ago, I found myself dropped from the voter registration rolls. It was a bit of a surprise; I showed up on election day and was informed I was not registered to vote in New Hanover County. The poll worker asked if I had registered to vote?
Yes, I answered. I have voted at this precinct location for the past six years. I usually come in with one of my parents and we would take turns standing with the dog outside, because a family that votes together stays together.
After much hemming and hawing with the poll workers, I was given a provisional ballot. I sorted out my registration and, thankfully (fingers crossed), have not had a problem since.
I come from a family that makes voting a priority. I am comfortable advocating for that right with people in positions of authority.
Recently, my household went through the citizenship process and one of the recurring themes in the process was voting is one of the most important ways to participate in a democracy and preform a civic duty. At the Naturalization Ceremony, the League of Women Voters were standing by with voter registration forms for each of the newly sworn-in citizens.
It doesnt take a giant leap of imagination to see those two lists overlap: Who visited a website the executive branch dislikes and who voted against the candidate in the last election? Where there is a match, how hard would it be to drop a name from the rolls? As far-fetched as this would have sounded 18 months ago, it is just not hard to imagine right now. If they control who can vote, they can control who wins an election. The timing of demanding these two sets of data is startling and frightening.
Dreamhost is challenging in the warrant and a hearing is scheduled on August 18. What is possibly more frightening than the above scenario is the possibility this is just a litmus test. If successful, where does it stop? What speech and assembly freedoms could we lose?
In the wake of the events at Charlottesville and escalating concern regarding North Koreawhich strike a primal and emotional chordit is hard to focus on something as dry as a justice department warrant. But that is exactly why it is important. The events surrounding the warrant and what happens with the information gathered will directly impact the publics ability to talk back to power and speak freely.
Allowing one branch of the government to target citizens who disagree is dangerous The possibilities of the internet are a fascinating double-edged sword. Never before in history have we had the ability to share information, opinions and ideas with such immediacy. Social media and web tools can allow for assemblies with short notice on a scale not previously imaginedand the documentation of the assemblies can be shared and made available around the world as they unfold. But the footprint and trackability of online activity is the other side of the coin. Potentially targeting someones voting rights based upon political opinions is not what the constitution intends.
Its important: protecting citizens rights to vote, speak and participate in democracy. It is essential to our future.
CharlottesvilleDepartment of Justiceencore magazineFourth AmendmentGwenyfar RohlerLeague of Women VotersMothers of the Disappeared in ArgentinaNaturalization Ceremonynew hanover countyNorth KoreaOrin KerrState Board of Elections and Ethics EnforcementUnited States ConstitutionWashington PostWilmington NC
FUZZY FOLK: Stray Owls pick up a drummer, drop a record and head to ILM NEWS OF THE WEIRD
- Protecting Privacy - The Weekly Standard - August 25th, 2017
- Violations Of The Fourth Amendment And Other Concerns About Amendments To New Jersey's Animal Cruelty Statute - JD Supra (press release) - August 22nd, 2017
- Plan would designate sheriffs as ICE contractors in bid to bypass Fourth Amendment court decisions - ABA Journal - August 22nd, 2017
- Homeschoolers ramp up 4th Amendment battle - WND.com - August 18th, 2017
- VerizonYes, VerizonJust Stood Up For Your Privacy - WIRED - August 16th, 2017
- 4th Amendment Protections Sought For Cell Site Location Data - Android Headlines - August 16th, 2017
- Fourth Amendment protects against warrantless seizure of cellphone location records, amicus brief argues - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the... - August 15th, 2017
- Google, Facebook ask Supreme Court to protect cell phone data under Fourth Amendment - The Hill - August 15th, 2017
- How Private is Your Cellphone? The Next Fourth Amendment Challenge - Crime Report (subscription) - August 15th, 2017
- Defending 4th Amendment Privacy Protections for Digital Property - Competitive Enterprise Institute (blog) - August 15th, 2017
- To Apply the Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age, Go Back to Its Text - Cato Institute (blog) - August 14th, 2017
- Brief of Amici Curiae of CEI, Cato and Reason Foundation in Carpenter v. US - Competitive Enterprise Institute (blog) - August 14th, 2017
- Augusta Sheriff's investigator sued for alleged Fourth Amendment violations - The Daily Progress - August 10th, 2017
- Federal Court Reverses Decision That Said Missouri Troopers Can Search Trucks Without Probable Cause - Lake Expo - August 10th, 2017
- The Fourth Amendment's Digital Update - The Daily Caller - August 8th, 2017
- Symposium: Carpenter and the eyewitness rule - SCOTUSblog - SCOTUSblog (blog) - August 5th, 2017
- Symposium: Millions of tiny constables Time to set the record ... - SCOTUSblog (blog) - August 3rd, 2017
- Federal Judge Rules Unlicensed Dogs Aren't Protected By Fourth ... - Reason (blog) - August 3rd, 2017
- Symposium: Will the Fourth Amendment protect 21st-century data? The court confronts the third-party doctrine - SCOTUSblog (blog) - August 3rd, 2017
- Traffic Stop and Request to Search Did Not Violate the Fourth Amendment - WisBar - August 3rd, 2017
- Symposium: Justices poised to consider, or reconsider, Fourth Amendment doctrines as they assess the scope of ... - SCOTUSblog (blog) - August 1st, 2017
- The justices return to cellphones and the Fourth Amendment: In Plain English - SCOTUSblog (blog) - August 1st, 2017
- Digital privacy bill still abandons probable cause for our papers - The Hill (blog) - August 1st, 2017
- We Can't Live in Fear of Our Own Intelligence Community | The ... - The American Conservative - July 31st, 2017
- Sunset any Extension of Electronic Surveillance Authority - HuffPost - July 29th, 2017
- Blood Test Suppressed: Police Misinformed Driver on Consequences of Refusal - WisBar - July 28th, 2017
- Federal judge orders Utah to turn over prescription drug database to DEA - Salt Lake Tribune - July 28th, 2017
- Section 702 surveillance should not be extended until the Fourth Amendment is honored - Washington Times - July 27th, 2017
- When Police Misread Tea Leaves They Violate the Fourth Amendment - Cato Institute (blog) - July 26th, 2017
- What Jeff Sessions' latest sanctuary cities funding threat could mean for Philly - Billy Penn - July 26th, 2017
- Drunk Driver Gave Consent, Blood Test was Voluntary, Supreme Court Says - WisBar - July 26th, 2017
- Supreme Court: Vehicle Impoundment Did Not Violate Fourth Amendment - WisBar - July 25th, 2017
- Section 702 Surveillance Authority: No Extension Unless Fourth Amendment Honored - HuffPost - July 25th, 2017
- 9th Circuit Revives Bison Observer's Civil Rights Claims - Courthouse News Service - July 25th, 2017
- The Fourth Amendment Implications of Sharing Server Space - JD Supra (press release) - July 23rd, 2017
- Voice of the people - Huntington Herald Dispatch - July 23rd, 2017
- Attorney General Sessions ignores 4th Amendment - Allentown Morning Call - July 22nd, 2017
- Editorial, 7/21: Sessions wrong to reinstate forfeiture practice - Lincoln Journal Star - July 21st, 2017
- The Bill of Rights - Courier-Gazette & Camden Herald (subscription) - July 21st, 2017
- The new Justice Department directive is garbage. Call your representative. - Washington Examiner - July 20th, 2017
- Reidsville police sergeant fired after material in search warrant appeared to be 'reckless, without basis, misleading' - WXII The Triad - July 20th, 2017
- FISA reform is needed, and conservatives should lead the way - Washington Examiner - July 17th, 2017
- Law Review: Never lend your car to your brother-in-law - Sierra Sun - July 14th, 2017
- The Dorothy Jackson-Southern Law School Performance Review Fiasco - The Hayride - July 14th, 2017
- Digital Privacy to Come Under Supreme Court's Scrutiny - New York Times - July 10th, 2017
- Charges dismissed against drone operator who documented protests - Bismarck Tribune - July 10th, 2017
- Homeowners don't have to let assessors in to challenge tax - The Edwardsville Intelligencer - July 8th, 2017
- Your vanishing location privacy: Why the Supreme Court is giving wireless networks a look - Insider Louisville - July 8th, 2017
- Appellate court denies Jeena Roberts appeal in convictions for fatal Lubbock crash - LubbockOnline.com - July 7th, 2017
- The Bootlegger, the Wiretap, and the Beginning of Privacy - The New Yorker - July 5th, 2017
- Anticipation already begins for Court's next term - Constitution Daily (blog) - July 5th, 2017
- Gang membership doesn't color a crime, court says - Greensburg Daily News - July 1st, 2017
- Federal judge rules two deputies used excessive force - The Spokesman-Review - June 29th, 2017
- ACLU files suit over force catheterization process - KSFY - June 29th, 2017
- A Supreme Court call on the third party doctrine - Washington Times - June 28th, 2017
- Oh, The Places You'll Go: Mobile Geolocation Data and the 4th Amendment - Lexology (registration) - June 28th, 2017
- Mishandle a Fraud Search, and All That Fine Evidence Could Be for Nothing - New York Times - June 26th, 2017
- Motion to suppress evidence filed in Krone theft case - Cody Enterprise - June 26th, 2017
- Opinion analysis: Court sends cross-border shooting lawsuit back to lower court - SCOTUSblog (blog) - June 26th, 2017
- What is the future of privacy, surveillance and policing technologies ... - CBS News - June 23rd, 2017
- Westside Story The Fog Has Not Lifted - The Suburban Times - June 23rd, 2017
- Appeals Court Strikes Down California's 30-Day Impound Law - FOX40 - June 22nd, 2017
- SCOTUS reviews 4th Amendment vs. surveillance case - OneNewsNow - June 17th, 2017
- Third party rights and the Carpenter cell-site case - Washington Post - June 15th, 2017
- So now coordinated traffic stops are a Fourth Amendment violation? - Hot Air - June 15th, 2017
- Coordinated traffic stops and the Fourth Amendment - Washington Post - June 15th, 2017
- Phillips: Congressman Goodlatte, Save the Fourth Amendment - Roanoke Times - June 15th, 2017
- Constitution and Fourth Amendment - Gettysburg Times - June 14th, 2017
- How should an originalist rule in the Fourth Amendment cell-site case? - Washington Post - June 14th, 2017
- With Cell Phone Record Case on SCOTUS Horizon, Originalist Analysis on IV Amendment Is Helpful - CNSNews.com - June 14th, 2017
- Highland case a Fourth Amendment victory: Guest commentary - San Bernardino County Sun - June 10th, 2017
- Highland case a Fourth Amendment victory: Guest commentary - Redlands Daily Facts - June 9th, 2017
- Supreme Court agrees to hear 'Carpenter v. United States,' the Fourth Amendment historical cell-site case - Washington Post - June 8th, 2017
- Sixth Circuit Appeals Court Latest To Say Real-Time Cellphone Location Tracking Not A Fourth Amendment Issue - Techdirt - June 8th, 2017
- Opinion analysis: Finding Fourth Amendment unanimity while allowing Fourth Amendment justice - SCOTUSblog (blog) - June 1st, 2017
- Obama Vandalized the Fourth Amendment - HuffPost - June 1st, 2017
- Why We're Suing the FBI for Records About Best Buy Geek Squad Informants - EFF - June 1st, 2017
- Bombshell Doc Reveals Massive Breaches of 4th Amendment By Obama NSA, FBI - MRCTV (blog) - June 1st, 2017
- Supreme Court Rules 8-0 for Police in Major Fourth Amendment Case - Reason (blog) - May 30th, 2017
- Law review article: The Effects of Legislation on Fourth ... - May 26th, 2017