The acrimonious split of Masha and Ronnie Shak ended up where many divorces do these days on Facebook.
As the proceedings unfolded, Mr. Shak offered a running commentary on social media, shared with the couples rabbi, assistant rabbi and members of their synagogue, court documents show.
He created a GoFundMe page entitled Help me KEEP MY SON. He called his ex-wife an evil liar. He illustrated the posts with a video of their one-year-old son, and told their friends to unfriend her.
That was until a probate court judge banned Mr. Shak from posting on social media about his divorce, a common practice known as a nondisparagement order.
As important as it is to protect a child from the emotional and psychological harm that might follow from one parents use of vulgar or disparaging words about the other, merely reciting that interest is not enough to satisfy the heavy burden of restricting speech, Justice Kimberly S. Budd wrote in a 13-page ruling.
Jennifer M. Lamanna, a lawyer who represented Mr. Shak in the appeal, called the ruling a game-changer because family and probate judges in the state frequently give such orders, and treat violations as contempt of court, carrying severe penalties.
There are thousands of these out there, which is why this is, for Massachusetts purposes, a landmark ruling, she said. People ask for them routinely and they are just handed out.
She said the orders, used for decades to control disparaging speech, have been expanded in recent years to focus on social media.
Under such orders, she said, my client could write a nasty letter to everyone he knows, but hes not allowed to put it up on social media. You can whisper in your synagogue, make nasty remarks about your ex-wife, but you cant put it up on Facebook.
Ms. Shaks attorney, Richard M. Novitch, said the ruling had an immediate, negative effect, prompting Mr. Shak to resume his postings on social media. Within the last 24 hours of the Shak case being issued by the S.J.C., hes right back at it, blowing up on social media, he said. Theres nothing that stops him.
While Mr. Novitch called the decision constitutionally sound, he said that common sense would suggest that children should be insulated from the combat between parents.
It will give license to a lot of bad actors to say what they want, regardless of where and when and the circumstances, he said.
The case underscored the role social media can play in modern divorce, as dueling parties try to win support from their circle of acquaintances.
Shortly after filing for divorce and seeking to remove Mr. Shak from their shared home, Ms. Shak filed a motion to prohibit him from posting disparaging remarks about her on social media. Two family court judges complied, with the second, George F. Phelan, issuing an order preventing both Mr. and Ms. Shak from posting any disparagement of the other party on social media until their son reached the age of 14.
Judge Phelans ruling prevented both spouses from using four specific expletives, as well as other pejoratives involving any gender, noting that the Court acknowledges the impossibility of listing herein all of the opprobrious vitriol and their permutations within the human lexicon.
It also banned the parents from posting photographs of their son in poses the judge considered inappropriate.
The court finds that the fathers posing, taking and posting of the photo of the parties child (then less than one year old) with a cigarette in his mouth was in poor taste, even if intended as a joke, and causes the Court to question the fathers maturity, the judge wrote.
But Judge Phelan also put the order on hold, to be reviewed on constitutional grounds by the Supreme Judicial Court. And this week, the court found it unconstitutional.
An order preventing someone from carrying out a certain kind of speech, known as prior restraint, is legal in the United States when the threat of damage caused by that speech is compelling. But though the state does have an interest in protecting children from being exposed to disparagement between their parents, it is not grave enough to justify restricting freedom of speech, the ruling said.
The ruling noted that one spouse, if offended by the others speech, has the option of suing for defamation or seeking a harassment prevention order. It also noted that the judges ruling does not apply to voluntary nondisparagement agreements.
What are people with common sense going to do? Theyre going to go out in the hallway and reach an accord in which each agrees not to disparage the other, said Mr. Novitch, Ms. Shaks attorney. It will be based on the agreement of the parties, not on judicial fiat.
Ruth A. Bourquin, a senior attorney from the American Civil Liberties Union, the co-author of an amicus brief supporting Mr. Shak, said she was relieved by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling. Were so grateful that the S.J.C. reiterated the first amendment principles, and recognized that they applied here, she said, comparing social media to the new town square.
Thats what it is, she said. Just because its bigger doesnt mean we can say that the rights of free speech dont apply. Having a government actor say you can say this, and not say that, is a somewhat scary alternative.
- Social media censorship is a potent threat to freedom of speech - Washington Times - July 25th, 2021
- Letter: Who is the fascist here? | Letters | theworldlink.com - Coos Bay World - July 25th, 2021
- Why The Threat To Free Speech Suddenly Looks Much Bigger - The Free Press - July 25th, 2021
- Tales from the Coffeeshop: Threat of UN words and free speech - Cyprus Mail - July 25th, 2021
- Two dozen cars lead parade in Creswell to protest fines related to Fourth of July parade - The Register-Guard - July 25th, 2021
- Conservative leaders say Biden admin is ripping the U.S. Constitution to shreds in scathing open letter - Fox News - July 25th, 2021
- Freedom of speech according to the gospel of Koch - University World News - July 21st, 2021
- U.K. Free-Speech Bill a Sound Solution to Censorship - National Review - July 21st, 2021
- She Hates Biden. Some of Her Neighbors Hate the Way She Shows It. - The New York Times - July 21st, 2021
- Academic freedom must include the right to criticise employers - Times Higher Education (THE) - July 21st, 2021
- Proposed Polish Bill Further Restricts Media Freedoms in a Climate of Civil Rights Activism - The Organization for World Peace - July 21st, 2021
- Professors enjoy academic freedom, but it doesnt allow them to teach or say whatever they want in class - San Francisco Chronicle - July 21st, 2021
- Candace Owens backs the Freedom Phone thats designed to promote free speech in fight against Big Tech... - The US Sun - July 16th, 2021
- SCOTUS Gets It Right In 'Mahanoy' With Measured Response To Student Speech - Government, Public Sector - United States - Mondaq News Alerts - July 16th, 2021
- Is Gender Wokeism the New Religion of the West? - Heritage.org - July 16th, 2021
- Ghost of Section 66A - The Indian Express - July 16th, 2021
- Trump's Big Tech lawsuit: Freedom of speech vs. the First Amendment | TheHill - The Hill - July 10th, 2021
- Letters: is it free speech or hate speech? - The Guardian - July 10th, 2021
- The rise of a generation of censors: Law schools the latest battlement over free speech | TheHill - The Hill - July 10th, 2021
- OCMD Police Say Profanity-Laced Biden Flags On The Boardwalk Are Considered Freedom Of Speech - CBS Baltimore - July 10th, 2021
- North Carolina Public Universities Arent Preparing Students Well on Free Speech - National Review - July 10th, 2021
- Gwen Berry, 'The Star Spangled Banner' and free speech in the world of sports | Opinion - NorthJersey.com - July 10th, 2021
- North Carolina Finds That Banning Indoctrination Is Hard - The Atlantic - July 10th, 2021
- Section 230 Continues To Not Mean Whatever You Want It To - Above the Law - July 10th, 2021
- Does Trump have a legitimate First Amendment case? - The Fulcrum - July 10th, 2021
- Conservatives Are the Ones Attacking Free Speech at Universities - Jacobin magazine - June 28th, 2021
- Commentary: How 'freedom of speech' is weaponized to fight anti-racism - Johnson City Press (subscription) - June 23rd, 2021
- Selective Free Speech: Academics Discussing Race Face the Real Cancel Culture Byline Times - Byline Times - June 23rd, 2021
- Celebrating the most American of freedoms | Ken Paulson - Wisconsin Newspaper Association - June 23rd, 2021
- Higher ed access, speech on campus bill moves on for House review - Ohio Capital Journal - June 23rd, 2021
- LGBTQ+ Need Not Apply - The Regulatory Review - June 23rd, 2021
- Ending hate speech starts with all of us - SC Times - June 13th, 2021
- If Critical Race Theory Is Banned, Are Teachers Protected by the First Amendment? - Education Week - June 13th, 2021
- Free speech and the culture wars The Justice Gap - thejusticegap.com - June 13th, 2021
- Free speech matters for all at UCL, and so does disruptive thinking - Jewish News - June 13th, 2021
- Twitter needs India and Nigeria to grow. It's running into trouble in both - KCTV Kansas City - June 13th, 2021
- Monday Morning Thoughts: Has the ACLU Lost Its Way in Protecting Speech They Hate? - The Peoples Vanguard of Davis - June 13th, 2021
- The free speech law will make university debate harder, not easier - The Guardian - May 24th, 2021
- 'Tool for censorship': Newly effective regulation could curb free speech in Indonesia - Jakarta Post - May 24th, 2021
- 'Attempt to 'murder' freedom of speech': Cong on Twitter India office searches - Hindustan Times - May 24th, 2021
- JIM SPENCE: Abertay University vagina row is no joke the free speech Stasi are threatening to silence us all - The Courier - May 24th, 2021
- What is the First Amendment? US right to free speech explained, after Prince Harry says its bonkers - iNews - May 20th, 2021
- The New Campus Free Speech Bill What Universities Need To Know And Need To Do - Consumer Protection - UK - Mondaq News Alerts - May 20th, 2021
- The Government is in a mess with its free speech bill it has already sabotaged its own legal definition - iNews - May 20th, 2021
- The new Campus Free Speech Bill - what universities need to know and need to do - Lexology - May 20th, 2021
- Cutting costs and cultivating free speech will put higher education on the right path | TheHill - The Hill - May 20th, 2021
- Academics And Officials Have Questioned The Evidence Behind Gavin Williamson's Excessive University Free Speech Bill - PoliticsHome - May 20th, 2021
- Letters to the Editor: May 20-26, 2021 - Blaine Northern Light - May 20th, 2021
- Federal lawsuit targets Georgia voting law, citing threat to voting, speech rights - Online Athens - May 20th, 2021
- Culture wars, identity politics and free speech: Rod Liddle and Peter Tatchell in conversation - Spectator.co.uk - May 20th, 2021
- Argumentative Essays on Importance of Freedom of Speech ... - May 9th, 2021
- Does Freedom of Speech Exist - Emerging Media - Loyola ... - May 9th, 2021
- Opinion: The past year has underscored the need for vigilance in defending the First Amendment - Poynter - May 9th, 2021
- Big Tech and freedom of speech | News, Sports, Jobs - The Sentinel - Lewistown Sentinel - April 23rd, 2021
- House Bill 22 Raises Concerns for Police Reform Efforts and Freedom of Speech - WKSU News - April 23rd, 2021
- The Supreme Court Justices Are Set to Hear Two Very Different Free Speech Cases What You Should Know - Law & Crime - April 23rd, 2021
- The Russell Group's statement of principles on universities protecting freedom of speech - FE News - April 23rd, 2021
- Should satire be protected as free speech? - Aliran - April 23rd, 2021
- James Acaster Never Wants to Make an Audience Member Cry Again - Vulture - April 23rd, 2021
- Wave of New 'Anti-Riot' Legislation Threatens Free Speech - The Daily Beast - April 19th, 2021
- A Festival takes on the complicated topic of Freedom of Speech in the U.S. and France - Frenchly - April 19th, 2021
- Historic Figures Who Recognized That Speech Is Freedom's First Line of Defense | Lawrence W. Reed - Foundation for Economic Education - April 19th, 2021
- My Turn: What does a paper owe its readers? - The Recorder - April 19th, 2021
- Analyzing the Recent Sixth Circuits Extension of Academic Freedom Protection to a College - Justia Verdict - April 19th, 2021
- Does Daniel Andrews have new bars on free speech coming? - The Spectator Australia - April 19th, 2021
- Lessons on Free Speech from the Soviet Union - kvor - March 31st, 2021
- When Neville Chamberlain tried to 'no-platform' the Yorkshire Post - The Conversation UK - March 31st, 2021
- The precedent of free speech on campus | The Record - The Record - March 21st, 2021
- Intermediary Liability and Why Free Speech in Software Matters - The Wire - March 21st, 2021
- A look back at a conversation with Carl Hiaasen on free speech - WMFE - March 21st, 2021
- Holmes' defense of Freedom of Speech | Columnists | willistonherald.com - Williston Daily Herald - March 18th, 2021
- My Turn: Our biggest threats to free speech - Concord Monitor - February 14th, 2021
- Q&A: Sociologist with Specialty in Right-Wing Movements on Free Speech and the First Amendment | Newsroom - UC Merced University News - February 14th, 2021
- Gavin Williamson set to appoint free speech champion with power to fine universities - iNews - February 14th, 2021
- Letters: The limits of free speech and the dangers of violence and insurrection - The Advocate - February 14th, 2021
- Free Speech Arguments Against Trump's Impeachment Dishonor The First Amendment - People For the American Way - February 6th, 2021
- The Wall Street Journal Misreads Section 230 and the First Amendment - Lawfare - February 6th, 2021
- After Thomas furore, Bar says to balance free speech and fair trial - Free Malaysia Today - February 6th, 2021
- Reggie Jackson blasts Curt Schilling over Hall controversy: Freedom of speech got you freed out of the Hall of Fame - The Boston Globe - February 2nd, 2021
- Opinion: What the Biden Administration Can Expect To Meet in Court - Prescott eNews - February 2nd, 2021