Assistant attorney general Eric Haskell argues in a virtual hearing March 23 that a bar owners verbal argument with fire inspectors in 2018 wasnt protected by the First Amendment.
The legal defense of a faked Cambridge fire law hasnt grown visibly stronger over time, but it has evolved with moves to bigger courts and has come to include attacks on First Amendment rights.
In an hourlong hearing March 23 before Suffolk Superior Court judge Christine M. Roach, the state said the owners of the former UpperWest bar in North Cambridge went beyond the protections of the First Amendment by arguing with fire inspectors even though the argument resulted from the inspectors threatening to shut down the bar with an inapplicable law.
It really wasnt a calm, reasoned exchange of ideas, assistant attorney general Eric Haskell told Roach during the virtual hearing. It was an argument. It was raised voices. It was interrupting. There was even inadvertent touching as the sides looked in the dark at the single xeroxed copy of a cooking-equipment law brought by inspectors.
In fact, Haskell said, the 35-minute exchange from 2018 captured on audio and video showed that bar co-owner Kim Courtney crossed over into territory covered by the Commonwealth v. Carter ruling from 2017, in which teen Michelle Carter was convicted of encouraging her suicidal boyfriend by text to take his own life not the first giant leap in a case that alleges threats and witness intimidation despite a lack of anyone saying they felt threatened or intimidated.
Haskells gambit about speech that basically functions as conduct thats integral to violation of a valid criminal statute seemed like a stretch to Ruth Bourquin, senior and managing attorney at the ACLU of Massachusetts, who is working with Courtney and bar co-owner Xavier Dietrich on the case. Bourqin noted that the Carter case applied when there is no lawful purpose to speech but urging an emotionally disturbed person to commit suicide is different from pointing out to fire inspectors that the law theyre trying to enforce doesnt apply where theyre trying to enforce it.
This speech not only had a lawful purpose, its constitutionally protected, Bourquin said. All the [owner] did was try to convince the officers that they are misapplying the law. [The right to] verbally oppose or challenge police action without risking arrest is the principal characteristic by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.
Background of the case
Fire inspectors tried to manage the imminent hazard of tea lights at a North Cambridge bar in 2018 by citing a law about portable cooking equipment. (Photo: Marc Levy)
In assessing whether the city and state violated the free speech rights of the bar owners, Haskell represents the states Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission against an appeal of its Oct. 3, 2019, ruling about UpperWest, which has since closed in North Cambridge.
What led to the ruling was a Sept. 29, 2018, visit to UpperWest by fire inspectors who insisted co-owners Kim Courtney and Xavier Dietrich extinguish the bars little tea lights but by citing a law about portable cooking equipment. The states argument is that the 35-minute debate about the law constituted an illegal hindering of the inspectors, and that toward the end Courtney uttered a threat amounting to witness intimidation.
That element revealed another way the case has evolved. When the city defended its punishment of the UpperWest bar, its lawyers argued to the state in 2019 that the bar owners video and audio recordings couldnt be relied on as evidence because they might have been altered or edited. On Tuesday, both sides referred repeatedly to that evidence to tell their side of the story. Haskell at one point commented that a decision was up to the courts review of the video.
Misquoting the evidence
Haskell raised doubt in court about his own familiarity with the video, though, despite telling Roach he had watched it many times.
Let me find the language here and make sure that I have it exactly right, Haskell said in introducing his case that threats were made against Cambridge fire inspectors. What the license manager said was You will live to regret this, is what the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission found.
Neither the audio nor video include that phrase, which has been repeated by fire staff, police, attorneys from the Cambridge Law Department, in a finding by a three-person ABCC panel and now by Haskell. (What Courtney told the departing inspectors in 2018 was, You guys are going to regret behaving this way, this is not how this works.)
The fire inspectors testified to the city as long ago as Nov. 7, 2018, that they did not take a bar owners comment as a physical threat, and a police officer on the scene, Dan McGinty, testified to the state June 24, 2019, that he couldnt cite any other basis for a threat either, since it isnt a crime to filed a lawsuit or complain about an employees conduct. Yet Haskell still argued that the manner of the license managers participation in this conversation is indicative of her intent. Are we cooperating with the inspectors or are we not?
The legal standard for a true threat requires either physical interference with an officer or a threat of physical harm, said Bourquin, of the Massachusetts chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.
Roach also did not seem convinced by the states arguments. There are certainly many, many interactions with law enforcement that are not calm, reasoned exchanges that doesnt mean that the First Amendment disappears, Roach said.
Cambridge assistant city solicitor Keplin Allwaters argues March 23 that the intent of the person uttering a statement isnt relevant.
The city also had representation on the call from Keplin Allwaters, assistant city solicitor, who added that when [Courtney] made the statements to the Cambridge firefighters and Cambridge police officers, the subjective intent of the person who utters that statement is not relevant. Katherine Sarmini Hoffman, who had argued the citys case with Allwaters, is no longer with the Law Department.
There were several additional laws brought up and debated during the hearing; some arose from points the city and state have added since the ABCC hearing, which Bourquin said was improper. And though the city and state have brought up laws showing that the fire department can make its own regulations and fire inspectors can enforce them, all that happened Sept. 29, 2018, was that the inspectors issued a verbal cease and desist order; Section 220.127.116.11 of the state Fire Safety Code requires that it be in writing, Bourquin said.
And she said claims that the tea lights represented an imminent hazard were hard to take seriously when inspectors knew they were burning since an August visit and proceeded to have a 35-minute discussion instead of ordering they be put out. They have the authority. They at anytime themselves could have either blown out the candles or engaged in this conversation, Bourquin said. They left them burning the entire time the conversation was going on in the parking lot, and in spite of Miss Courtney asking them to hurry up.
There is no set date for a next hearing or ruling by Roach. The judge said her review of the case and evidence could take a bit of time.
Please consider making a financial contribution to maintain, expand and improve Cambridge Day.
- Floridas ban on bans will test First Amendment rights of social media companies - TechCrunch - May 24th, 2021
- Prince Harry's First Amendment Aversion Is Funny; the Governments That Agree Are Scary - Reason - May 24th, 2021
- Face Masks and the First Amendment - The Wall Street Journal - May 24th, 2021
- First Amendment Confusion | Opinion | Northern Express - northernexpress.com - May 24th, 2021
- The First Amendment and Mask Mandates Reason.com - Reason - May 24th, 2021
- OPINION: Prince Harry, allow me to explain the First Amendment - The Richmond Observer - May 24th, 2021
- Wicker, Hyde-Smith Cosponsor the 'Don't Weaponize the IRS Act' - Senator Roger Wicker - May 24th, 2021
- Opinion: 'Ohio will never bow to totalitarian pressures' - The Columbus Dispatch - May 24th, 2021
- If Courts Cant Agree on Who an Appropriate Person, Is for Notice of Sexual Harassment Under Title IX, How Can We Expect a Student in Crisis to Do So?... - May 24th, 2021
- Franklin Graham Can't Handle Prince Harry's Criticism of the First Amendment - Friendly Atheist - Patheos - May 24th, 2021
- Sharp increase in hate crimes has Mass. legislators looking to tighten laws - Milford Daily News - May 24th, 2021
- Tillis, Colleagues Introduce 'Don't Weaponize the IRS Act' - Thom Tillis - May 24th, 2021
- Washington: Second Amendment Banned in First Amendment Spaces After the Signing of Anti-Gun Measure - NRA ILA - May 16th, 2021
- Citing First Amendment, 4th Circuit reverses conviction for retired Air Force officer's use of N-word - ABA Journal - May 16th, 2021
- Prince Harry Calls The First Amendment 'Bonkers' and He Makes a Good Point - Showbiz Cheat Sheet - May 16th, 2021
- The First Amendment's Role in Broadcast and Online Regulation - Lexology - May 16th, 2021
- The Road Ahead for Net Neutrality and the First Amendment - JD Supra - May 16th, 2021
- Compliance Corner: A Brief Introduction to the History and Theory of Campaign-Finance Law, Part II - InsiderNJ - May 16th, 2021
- New Lawsuit Argues That D.C.'s Ban on Dancing at Weddings Violates the First Amendment - Reason - May 16th, 2021
- Commentary: It's time to revive Fairness Doctrine and expand it - Crain's Detroit Business - May 16th, 2021
- Social And Political Issues And The Workplace Implications For Employers - Employment and HR - United States - Mondaq News Alerts - May 16th, 2021
- Protesters: Changes to the Rockford City Market are meant to stymie their message - Rockford Register Star - May 16th, 2021
- Twitter's lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton tossed by federal judge - The Texas Tribune - May 16th, 2021
- Idaho Press Club objects to the subpoena of journalist Nate Eaton, of East Idaho News - East Idaho News - May 16th, 2021
- Trump, the Facebook Ban, and Who Decides - Bloomberg Law - May 16th, 2021
- First Amendment Versus The Civil Rights Act: A Clash Of Titans - Employment and HR - United States - Mondaq News Alerts - May 3rd, 2021
- Commentary: How to live your First Amendment freedoms - Press Herald - May 3rd, 2021
- Students and First Amendment Week: The Right to Be Loud - BVU The Tack Online - May 3rd, 2021
- The First Amendment and Social Media The Tack Online - BVU The Tack Online - May 3rd, 2021
- Justices Appear Poised to Strike Down California Law in Case with Potential to Allow More Dark Money in Politics - Law & Crime - May 3rd, 2021
- A close call this time, but lawmakers have a bad attitude on openness | Cotterell - Tallahassee Democrat - May 3rd, 2021
- The Two Teds - Episode 3 - The First Amendment - Gibson Dunn - April 19th, 2021
- MyPillow CEO Recruits First Amendment Heavy Hitters to Fight Dominion - The Daily Beast - April 19th, 2021
- Some LGBTQ groups and leaders are taking different sides in First Amendment case - Out In Jersey - April 19th, 2021
- Tenth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity to Police Who Knowingly Violated the First Amendment - Cato Institute - April 19th, 2021
- Spencer and Volokh Discuss the First Amendment and Content Moderation on Social Media Platforms - UMass Dartmouth - April 19th, 2021
- Lecturers speak on the importance of the First Amendment in the civil rights movement - Iowa State Daily - April 19th, 2021
- Protect the police or the First Amendment? | TheHill - The Hill - April 19th, 2021
- Smartmatic Calls Bulls--t on Foxs First Amendment Argument - Vanity Fair - April 19th, 2021
- Letter: Equality Act targets First Amendment rights | Letters to the Editor | readingeagle.com - Reading Eagle - April 19th, 2021
- MLive/Kalamazoo Gazettes Brad Devereaux wins First Amendment Award for exposing closed-door meetings - MLive.com - April 19th, 2021
- The IHRA Definition of Anti-Semitism Puts Jews on the Wrong Side of the First Amendment - Jewish Week - April 19th, 2021
- Project Veritas Gonna Sue Twitter For Defamatory Section 230 Censorship And First Amendment Assault Or Something - Above the Law - April 19th, 2021
- Letter: On God and the First Amendment | Communities | mainstreet-nashville.com - Main Street Nashville - April 19th, 2021
- Justice Thomas's Misguided Concurrence on Platform Regulation - Lawfare - April 19th, 2021
- 'Hate has no home here': City of Appleton puts up sign countering sign with homophobic slur - Post-Crescent - April 19th, 2021
- Prohibited prayer and the limits of government authority even in a pandemic | Sullum - Chicago Sun-Times - April 19th, 2021
- Clarence Thomas plays a poor devils advocate in floating First Amendment limits for tech companies - TechCrunch - April 6th, 2021
- First Circuit Upholds First Amendment Right to Secretly Audio Record the Police - EFF - April 6th, 2021
- Justice Clarence Thomas Takes Aim At Tech And Its Power 'To Cut Off Speech' - NPR - April 6th, 2021
- "Fake News" and the First Amendment - University of Dayton - News Home - April 6th, 2021
- Clarence Thomas blasts Section 230, wants common-carrier rules on Twitter - Ars Technica - April 6th, 2021
- Drones (and the First Amendment) take on regulatory overreach in North Carolina - Chatham Journal Weekly - April 6th, 2021
- The university response to offensive speech often reflects a feeble commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion - Poynter - April 6th, 2021
- Online event examines the relationship between free speech and firearms - Nevada Today - April 6th, 2021
- Official Website for the Governor of Maryland - maryland.gov - April 6th, 2021
- Opinion: Remembering the Core Four Pillars of Journalism Amid a Pandemic - Times of San Diego - April 6th, 2021
- Tenth Circuit Misses Opportunity to Affirm the First Amendment Right to Record the Police - EFF - April 2nd, 2021
- Is There a First Amendment Right to Tweet? - JSTOR Daily - April 2nd, 2021
- Is blocking a constituent on Twitter against the First Amendment? This DC resident thinks so | The Hill is Home - The Hillishome - April 2nd, 2021
- The 6th Circuit Reached the Right Conclusion on Preferred Pronouns. Other Courts Should Follow Suit. - Heritage.org - April 2nd, 2021
- Why It's So Hard to Prosecute White Extremists - The Marshall Project - April 2nd, 2021
- Loeb School announces free spring classes and writing workshops - The Union Leader - April 2nd, 2021
- Parler Forced To Explain The First Amendment To Its Users After They Complain About Parler Turning Over Info To The FBI - Techdirt - March 31st, 2021
- Terrorism and Other Dangerous Online Content: Exporting the First Amendment? - Just Security - March 31st, 2021
- The First Amendment: Rarely Popular, Always Necessary - The Dispatch - March 31st, 2021
- The First Amendment: What It Is & What It Isn't - WSHU - March 31st, 2021
- Drawing a Line Between Internet Trolls and the First Amendment - Government Technology - March 31st, 2021
- BREAKING: ACLU Representatives Join Unprecedented Podcast to Discuss HUGE Ramifications of Creasy/Lindenbaum/TCPA on First Amendment Rights - Lexology - March 31st, 2021
- Courts: Bystanders have right to record police under the First Amendment - Newsday - March 31st, 2021
- RCFP urges court to order Texas AG to stop investigating Twitter - Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press - March 31st, 2021
- Pronouns in the University Classroom & the First Amendment - Reason - March 31st, 2021
- Matt Taibbi: A Biden appointee's troubling views on the First Amendment - National Post - March 31st, 2021
- Pronouns and the Philosophy Professor - The Wall Street Journal - March 31st, 2021
- Letters to the editor | Opinion | journalpatriot.com - Wilkes Journal Patriot - March 31st, 2021
- Jane Briggs-Bunting, who championed the 1st Amendment, dies at 70 - Detroit Free Press - March 31st, 2021
- Was a Trump critic's 1st Amendment violated by Yale? We're about to find out. - MSNBC - March 31st, 2021
- The Cyberlaw Podcast: Can Editorial Middleware Cut the Power of the Big Platforms? - Lawfare - March 31st, 2021
- Judge In Chauvin Trial Rules That Underage Witnesses Can Testify - NPR - March 31st, 2021
- An Alternative to Impeachment: New Bill Helps Enforce Accountability for Capitol Riots - Just Security - March 31st, 2021