The principle that anyone born in the United States is an American citizen is enshrined in the 14th Amendment. But in a divided decision Tuesday, a federal appeals court reaffirmed the unique inapplicability of the citizenship clause to one of Americas six federal territories American Samoa, the only one of the six where birthright citizenship does not currently apply.
The ruling in Fitisemanu v. United States doesnt just rest on a deeply flawed understanding of the 14th Amendment. It also breathes new life into a long since discredited distinction that the Supreme Court drew in the early 20th century one in which territories that just happened to be predominantly white received full constitutional protections, while those that were not didnt.
After years of struggle between the U.S., Germany, and United Kingdom for dominance over the Samoan island chain, the islands were partitioned into two in 1899. Just prior to the partition, America had gained significant overseas territories as a result of concessions arising out of the Spanish-American War. The eastern group of Samoan islands quickly joined the ranks after tribal leaders formally ceded the land to the Americans. The western group remained a German possession through Germanys defeat in World War I, becoming an independent nation in 1962.
But even as residents of other U.S. territories gained birthright citizenship either by constitutional mandate or statute, and even as American Samoans (a disproportionate percentage of whom have served in the U.S. military throughout the past century) fought for similar and other protections in Congress, they were left out.
A federal judge in Utah had agreed that the denial of citizenship was unconstitutional but a divided panel of the Denver-based federal appeals court reversed that decision.
In the case decided Tuesday, three American Samoans living in Utah had brought suit challenging their denial of citizenship which, among other things, means that they are denied the right to vote, the right to run for elective federal or state office outside American Samoa, and the right to serve on federal and state juries. A federal judge in Utah had agreed that the denial of citizenship was unconstitutional but a divided panel of the Denver-based federal appeals court reversed that decision.
Writing for the majority, Judge Carlos Lucero relied heavily on a series of early-20th century Supreme Court decisions known as the Insular Cases. In those cases (none of which dealt specifically with birthright citizenship), the justices adopted a distinction between incorporated territories (those U.S. possessions that were destined for statehood) and unincorporated territories (those U.S. possessions that were not). The Constitution generally applied to its fullest extent in the former, whereas courts were left to decide on a case-by-case (and provision-by-provision) basis the extent to which it applied in the latter.
Forests have been felled on the myriad problems with the Insular Cases. To make a long story shorter, as five of the leading scholars on the subject wrote in 2014:
The Insular Cases approach to the constitutional status of the U.S. territories lacks any grounding in constitutional text, structure, or history. The Insular Cases, rather, reflected the assumptions of the time that the United States, like the great European powers of that era, must (despite being constrained by a written Constitution) be capable of acquiring overseas possessions without admitting their uncivilized and savage inhabitants of alien races to equal citizenship. That reasoning, even if it were constitutionally relevant, is the product of another age. It has no place in modern jurisprudence even if it had any validity in earlier times.
Of course, lower courts would still be bound by those decisions if any of them were squarely on point. But none of the Insular Cases involved the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment. Instead, the Court of Appeals was free to reach the issue anew in this case and still chose to abide by the Insular Cases discredited framework. In the process, the court wholly ignored the original context of the citizenship clause enacted to overturn a Supreme Court decision in which one of the questions had been the status of slaves in federal territories.
The Supreme Courts 1857 decision in the Dred Scott case is infamous for its full-throated legal defense of the institution of slavery. But its constitutional significance was its specific holding that slaves and their descendants were not and could not become U.S. citizens. Congress accordingly did not just amend the Constitution to abolish slavery after the Civil War; it also wrote into our founding charter the principle of birthright citizenship that anyone born in the United States is a citizen thereof.
Turning to the question of whether the citizenship clause should apply in an unincorporated territory like American Samoa, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals focused its analysis on whether it would be impractical or anomalous to extend birthright citizenship to American Samoa and held that it would.
Their reasoning: a majority of American Samoans have expressed concern that recognition of birthright citizenship would open the door to arguments that other constitutional provisions cannot be reconciled with some of American Samoas unique legal traditions. That includes worries that if the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment applies to American Samoa, it might presage a holding that the Supreme Courts modern Fifth Amendment property rights jurisprudence likewise applies to the Pacific Ocean territory, , threatening the islands communal ownership of property..
But this analysis not only misapplied the Supreme Courts precedents (which ask whether recognition of the right is impractical or anomalous from the federal governments perspective); it also fundamentally devalues the importance of constitutional rights in the territories where those rights that arent supported by a majority are perhaps the most in need of judicial incorporation.
One might wonder why its such a big deal that a federal appeals court has held that 50,000 Americans arent constitutionally entitled to birthright citizenship. The answer is two-fold: First, to reach that result, the court had to both ignore the original purpose and context of the citizenship clause and revive the deeply problematic rationale of the Insular Cases
Second, and more fundamentally, one of the two central goals of the post-Civil War amendments was to hard-wire into the Constitution the idea that theres only one class of American to repudiate not only the institution of slavery, but also the caste system it created. The more that contemporary courts recognize circumstances in which our compatriots are not treated as equals, the more they open the door to additional erosions of this fundamental ideal.
Steve Vladeck is a professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law whose teaching and research focus on federal jurisdiction, constitutional law and national security law. He is co-editor-in-chief of the Just Security blog (@just_security) and co-host of "The National Security Law Podcast" (@nslpodcast).
- The Supreme Court Further Expands The Definition Of A Physical - Mondaq News Alerts - August 2nd, 2021
- The Supreme Court Further Expands the Definition of a Physical Taking of Property That Violates Fifth Amendment Protections - JD Supra - August 2nd, 2021
- Judge expected to rule Wednesday whether to charge Mensah in on-duty shooting - WISN Milwaukee - August 2nd, 2021
- Vaccine opponents appear increasingly confused about HIPAA - MSNBC - August 2nd, 2021
- Opinion: Elections are the worst method of picking judges except for all the others - Houston Chronicle - August 2nd, 2021
- FBI and Detroit police taught 'White Boy Rick' the drug game then double-crossed him, he says. Now, he wants $100 million - WDJT - August 2nd, 2021
- Trevor Bauers Hearing Strategy Is A Trial In The Court of Public Opinion - Beyond the Box Score - July 27th, 2021
- Erika Jayne's Husband Thomas Girardi To Plead The Fifth As Part Of Embezzlement Investigation - Radar Online - July 27th, 2021
- Gov. Cuomo: New Yorkers will be shocked when they hear facts of AGs harassment investigation - RochesterFirst - July 27th, 2021
- Fianc of victim in Rodney Reed case testifies, waives right to attorney - KXAN.com - July 27th, 2021
- What Is HIPAA and How Does the Law Work? - The New York Times - July 27th, 2021
- How Sha'Carri Richardson Can Sue Her Way Back Into the Olympics - The Daily Beast - July 27th, 2021
- QUICK BRAG AS I RECOVER FROM THE PALOOZA: Court in NY Says Hunstein Doesnt survive Ramirez and I Told You So - TCPAWorld.com - July 27th, 2021
- Money & the Law: With every rule there seems to be an exception - Denver Gazette - July 18th, 2021
- The Chase County Courthouse is a Kansas icon. The jail in its shadow is a disgrace. - Kansas Reflector - July 18th, 2021
- Gary Pearce: UNC and the debate over dissent - Salisbury Post - Salisbury Post - July 18th, 2021
- This is my land and I plan on keeping it Monroe County families trying to fight TVAs eminent domain - WATE 6 On Your Side - July 18th, 2021
- A Supreme Court ruling that's right out of the 19th century - Raw Story - July 18th, 2021
- What Does Bill Cosbys Overturned Conviction Mean for Your Fifth Amendment Rights Against Self-Incrimination? - JD Supra - July 16th, 2021
- Wisk Submits Evidence Claiming Massive Theft and Archer's Use of Wisk Trade Secrets, as Archer Engineer Pleads the Fifth - PRNewswire - July 16th, 2021
- Give And Take: How The U.S. Supreme Courts Ruling In Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid May Impact Rhode Islanders Who Own Property Abutting Public Lands -... - July 16th, 2021
- Ink Blog: The Supreme Court & the Constitution in 2021 - Ashland Daily Press - July 16th, 2021
- Man convicted of sex crime on Colo. tribal reservation appeals to SCOTUS - coloradopolitics.com - July 16th, 2021
- Federal Circuit Reverses CIT's Decision on the President's Ability to Modify Section 232 Tariffs - Lexology - July 16th, 2021
- Letter to the editor: Property rights should be considered human rights - The Bozeman Daily Chronicle - July 16th, 2021
- GARY PEARCE: UNC and the debate over dissent - WRAL.com - July 16th, 2021
- NCLA Appeals to First Circuit Over IRSs Unlawfully Seizing Cryptocurrency Data of Thousands - Yahoo Finance - July 16th, 2021
- What the US Government Brief Should Have Said in Al-Hela: On Guantanamo and Due Process - Just Security - July 16th, 2021
- Update On Union Access To Property - Employment and HR - United States - Mondaq News Alerts - July 16th, 2021
- The Right To Be Let Alone: What To Do When COVID Strike Force Teams Come Knocking OpEd - Eurasia Review - July 16th, 2021
- Kristin Smart's accused killer Paul Flores' charges amended to include two allegations of rape in LA - Californianewstimes.com - July 16th, 2021
- Cosby case rips open wounds that just won't heal. Here's why. - York Daily Record - July 16th, 2021
- Norris Burkes: The case of the stolen freedoms - Charleston Post Courier - July 5th, 2021
- Why was Bill Cosby released from prison after being found guilty of drugging and molesting woman? - MassLive.com - July 5th, 2021
- Pennsylvania court was right to overturn Cosbys conviction - Los Angeles Times - July 2nd, 2021
- Bruce Castor, before and after Cosby: Trump, insurrection, and Katheleen Kane - On top of Philly news - Billy Penn - July 2nd, 2021
- Where's Lucy? Sham teen marriage and felony charges featured in case of missing St. Charles County girl - KSDK.com - July 2nd, 2021
- A lawyer for Ghislaine Maxwell says she should be set free like Bill Cosby was, but legal experts say that's highly unlikely - Yahoo News - July 2nd, 2021
- EXPLAINER: Why Bill Cosbys conviction was overturned - WKRG News 5 - July 2nd, 2021
- The Courts and Healthcare Policy - July 2021 | McGuireWoods Consulting - JDSupra - JD Supra - July 2nd, 2021
- Letter: Where is our Fifth Amendment? | Letters To Editor | berkshireeagle.com - Berkshire Eagle - June 28th, 2021
- Joe Biden and the Blessed Sacrament | Napolitano - New Jersey Herald - June 28th, 2021
- Recapping Wednesday's Cases, and Predicting the Remaining 8 Cases - Reason - June 28th, 2021
- Supreme Court Finds Fifth Amendment Taking in State Regulation Granting Access to Private Property - JD Supra - June 27th, 2021
- Villager's son wants judge yanked from case in legal fight over mask mandate - Villages-News - June 27th, 2021
- Biden and the Sacrament | News, Sports, Jobs - Gloversville Leader-Herald - June 27th, 2021
- A Philly man was cleared of murder after 34 years by evidence that was in the police file all along - The Philadelphia Inquirer - June 27th, 2021
- Devin Nunes's Libel Lawyering, Employee Witnesses, and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination - Reason - June 20th, 2021
- Critical race theory has proved divisive. What is it? - theday.com - June 20th, 2021
- Murder Defendant Martin Takes the Stand on His Defense - wkdzradio.com - June 20th, 2021
- Gov. Abbott Vowed to Build a Wall With Mexico. Texas Borderland Owners Say Not in My Backyard - NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth - June 20th, 2021
- Prosecution rests in 2nd trial of officers accused of assaulting Black colleague by again focusing on texts - KSDK.com - June 20th, 2021
- NCLA Lawsuit in Texas Seeks to End SEC's Lifetime Gag Orders that Violate the First Amendment - StreetInsider.com - June 20th, 2021
- In His Wild Bid to Stop Leaks to the Press, Trump Even Spied on His Own Lawyer - Truthout - June 20th, 2021
- Paul Robeson Was One of the Greatest Figures of the 20th Century - Jacobin magazine - June 20th, 2021
- Lorraine Reich: It's more than corporate money in elections - The Union of Grass Valley - June 4th, 2021
- Pharma Bro Martin Shkreli Gets a Slap on the Wrist for Using Contraband Phone to Discuss Pharma Business Behind Bars - Law & Crime - June 4th, 2021
- The FBI Took Their Safe Deposit Box and Everything Inside It. Two Months Later, They're Still Waiting for It To Be Returned. - Reason - June 4th, 2021
- Imprisoned Felon Martin Shkreli Busted For Using Contraband Phone To Discuss Pharma Business With Associates Following Daraprim Scandal - Radar Online - June 4th, 2021
- Citing privacy concerns, Huntsville wont explain why convicted officer is still employed - AL.com - June 4th, 2021
- What the House should quickly do if the January 6 commission fails in the Senate - WTVA - May 27th, 2021
- Trial starts for two men charged in the murder of 8-year-old King William child - 8News - May 27th, 2021
- How to Remember the Difference Between Invoke and Evoke - Lifehacker - May 27th, 2021
- Notable investigations, trials and dates ahead 1 year after George Floyds death - NewsNation Now - May 27th, 2021
- AG's Move to Criminal Probe Is a Red Alert for the Trump Org - The Daily Beast - May 27th, 2021
- Drivers Beware: The Deadly Perils of Blank Check Traffic Stops - John Whitehead's Commentary Drivers Beware: The Deadly Perils of Blank Check Traffic... - May 27th, 2021
- Trump Judge Casts Deciding Vote to Excuse Clear Violation by Police of Black Man's Fifth Amendment Rights: Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears - People... - May 11th, 2021
- If the Devil of the WTO IP Waiver Is in the Details, What Are the Details? - JD Supra - May 11th, 2021
- Owens v. Brown: How The Navy's Women Won the Right to Serve at Sea - The Maritime Executive - May 11th, 2021
- Why Is the Justice Department Trying To Punish Derek Chauvin Twice? - Reason - May 11th, 2021
- Voice of the People | | hastingstribune.com - Hastings Tribune - May 11th, 2021
- Frontenacs to pick fifth overall in OHL Priority Selection - The Kingston Whig-Standard - May 11th, 2021
- Trial hits snag for convicted murderer charged in another deadly Youngstown shooting - WKBN.com - April 29th, 2021
- Convention of states blocked in Legislature | netnebraska.org - NET Nebraska - April 29th, 2021
- Derek Chauvin Trial: Updates The Spectator - The Spectator - April 29th, 2021
- Morries Hall and the right not to incriminate yourself (Fifth Amendment) - MSR News Online - April 11th, 2021
- Man who was with George Floyd during his arrest pleads the Fifth amid Chauvin trial - KARE11.com - April 11th, 2021
- Floyd's Friend Invokes 5th Amendment Before Testimony Resumes in Chauvin Trial - Voice Of Alexandria - April 11th, 2021
- Officers take the stand on training and protocol; Floyd's friend fears self-incrimination - WXOW.com - April 11th, 2021
- Today's Headlines and Commentary - Lawfare - Lawfare - April 11th, 2021